All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC 11/11] ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:07:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <08173ee255f70cdc8de9ac3aa2e851f9d74acb12.1674822312.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1674822311.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>

CR1_5 aims to optimize allocations which can't be satisfied in CR1. The
fact that we couldn't find a group in CR1 suggests that it would be
difficult to find a continuous extent to compleltely satisfy our
allocations. So before falling to the slower CR2, in CR1.5 we
proactively trim the the preallocations so we can find a group with
(free / fragments) big enough.  This speeds up our allocation at the
cost of slightly reduced preallocation.

The patch also adds a new sysfs tunable:

* /sys/fs/ext4/<partition>/mb_cr1_5_max_trim_order

This controls how much CR1.5 can trim a request before falling to CR2.
For example, for a request of order 7 and max trim order 2, CR1.5 can
trim this upto order 5.

Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ext4/ext4.h    |  7 +++-
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 14 +++++++
 fs/ext4/sysfs.c   |  2 +
 4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index d8fa01e54e81..879aac5e39a9 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ enum SHIFT_DIRECTION {
  * criteria the slower the allocation. We start at lower criterias and keep
  * falling back to higher ones if we are not able to find any blocks.
  */
-#define EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS 4
+#define EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS 5
 
 /*
  * Flags used in mballoc's allocation_context flags field.
@@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ enum SHIFT_DIRECTION {
 #define EXT4_MB_CR0_OPTIMIZED		0x8000
 /* Avg fragment size rb tree lookup succeeded at least once for cr = 1 */
 #define EXT4_MB_CR1_OPTIMIZED		0x00010000
+/* Avg fragment size rb tree lookup succeeded at least once for cr = 1.5 */
+#define EXT4_MB_CR1_5_OPTIMIZED		0x00020000
+
 struct ext4_allocation_request {
 	/* target inode for block we're allocating */
 	struct inode *inode;
@@ -1627,6 +1630,7 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
 	unsigned long s_mb_last_start;
 	unsigned int s_mb_prefetch;
 	unsigned int s_mb_prefetch_limit;
+	unsigned int s_mb_cr1_5_max_trim_order;
 
 	/* stats for buddy allocator */
 	atomic_t s_bal_reqs;	/* number of reqs with len > 1 */
@@ -1641,6 +1645,7 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
 	atomic_t s_bal_2orders;	/* 2^order hits */
 	atomic_t s_bal_cr0_bad_suggestions;
 	atomic_t s_bal_cr1_bad_suggestions;
+	atomic_t s_bal_cr1_5_bad_suggestions;
 	atomic64_t s_bal_cX_groups_considered[EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS];
 	atomic64_t s_bal_cX_hits[EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS];
 	atomic64_t s_bal_cX_failed[EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS];		/* cX loop didn't find blocks */
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 1ce1174aea52..8e9032f94966 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -960,6 +960,67 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr1(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 		*group = grp->bb_group;
 		ac->ac_flags |= EXT4_MB_CR1_OPTIMIZED;
 	} else {
+		*new_cr = CR1_5;
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * We couldn't find a group in CR1 so try to find the highest free fragment
+ * order we have and proactively trim the goal request length to that order to
+ * find a suitable group faster.
+ *
+ * This optimizes allocation speed at the cost of slightly reduced
+ * preallocations. However, we make sure that we don't trim the request too
+ * much and fall to CR2 in that case.
+ */
+static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr1_5(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
+		enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups)
+{
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
+	struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL;
+	int i, order, min_order;
+
+	if (unlikely(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_CR1_5_OPTIMIZED)) {
+		if (sbi->s_mb_stats)
+			atomic_inc(&sbi->s_bal_cr1_5_bad_suggestions);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * mb_avg_fragment_size_order() returns order in a way that makes
+	 * retrieving back the length using (1 << order) inaccurate. Hence, use
+	 * fls() instead since we need to know the actual length while modifying
+	 * goal length.
+	 */
+	order = fls(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len);
+	min_order = order - sbi->s_mb_cr1_5_max_trim_order;
+	if (min_order < 0)
+		min_order = 0;
+
+	for (i = order; i >= min_order; i--) {
+		if (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len <= (1 << i)) {
+			/*
+			 * Scale down goal len to make sure we find something
+			 * in the free fragments list. Basically, reduce
+			 * preallocations.
+			 */
+			ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = 1 << i;
+		} else {
+			break;
+		}
+
+		grp = ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists(ac,
+							     mb_avg_fragment_size_order(ac->ac_sb,
+							     ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len));
+		if (grp)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (grp) {
+		*group = grp->bb_group;
+		ac->ac_flags |= EXT4_MB_CR1_5_OPTIMIZED;
+	} else {
+		/* Reset goal length to original goal length before falling into CR2 */
+		ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = ac->ac_orig_goal_len;
 		*new_cr = CR2;
 	}
 }
@@ -1026,6 +1087,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 		ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr0(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups);
 	} else if (*new_cr == CR1) {
 		ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr1(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups);
+	} else if (*new_cr == CR1_5) {
+		ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr1_5(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * TODO: For CR=2, we can arrange groups in an rb tree sorted by
@@ -2323,7 +2386,7 @@ void ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 
 		if (ac->ac_criteria < CR2) {
 			/*
-			 * In CR1, we are sure that this group will
+			 * In CR1 and CR1_5, we are sure that this group will
 			 * have a large enough continuous free extent, so skip
 			 * over the smaller free extents
 			 */
@@ -2453,6 +2516,7 @@ static bool ext4_mb_good_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 
 		return true;
 	case CR1:
+	case CR1_5:
 		if ((free / fragments) >= ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len)
 			return true;
 		break;
@@ -2715,7 +2779,7 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 			 * spend a lot of time loading imperfect groups
 			 */
 			if ((prefetch_grp == group) &&
-			    (cr > CR1 ||
+			    (cr > CR1_5 ||
 			     prefetch_ios < sbi->s_mb_prefetch_limit)) {
 				nr = sbi->s_mb_prefetch;
 				if (ext4_has_feature_flex_bg(sb)) {
@@ -2755,8 +2819,8 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 			ac->ac_groups_scanned++;
 			if (cr == CR0)
 				ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(ac, &e4b);
-			else if (cr == CR1 && sbi->s_stripe &&
-					!(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len % sbi->s_stripe))
+			else if ((cr == CR1 || cr == CR1_5) && sbi->s_stripe &&
+				 !(ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len % sbi->s_stripe))
 				ext4_mb_scan_aligned(ac, &e4b);
 			else
 				ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(ac, &e4b);
@@ -2770,6 +2834,11 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 		/* Processed all groups and haven't found blocks */
 		if (sbi->s_mb_stats && i == ngroups)
 			atomic64_inc(&sbi->s_bal_cX_failed[cr]);
+
+		if (i == ngroups && ac->ac_criteria == CR1_5)
+			/* Reset goal length to original goal length before
+			 * falling into CR2 */
+			ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = ac->ac_orig_goal_len;
 	}
 
 	if (ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len > 0 && ac->ac_status != AC_STATUS_FOUND &&
@@ -2937,6 +3006,16 @@ int ext4_seq_mb_stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
 	seq_printf(seq, "\t\tbad_suggestions: %u\n",
 		   atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cr1_bad_suggestions));
 
+	seq_puts(seq, "\tcr1.5_stats:\n");
+	seq_printf(seq, "\t\thits: %llu\n", atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_hits[CR1_5]));
+	seq_printf(seq, "\t\tgroups_considered: %llu\n",
+		   atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[CR1_5]));
+	seq_printf(seq, "\t\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[CR1_5]));
+	seq_printf(seq, "\t\tuseless_loops: %llu\n",
+		   atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_failed[CR1_5]));
+	seq_printf(seq, "\t\tbad_suggestions: %u\n",
+		   atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cr1_5_bad_suggestions));
+
 	seq_puts(seq, "\tcr2_stats:\n");
 	seq_printf(seq, "\t\thits: %llu\n", atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_hits[CR2]));
 	seq_printf(seq, "\t\tgroups_considered: %llu\n",
@@ -3452,6 +3531,8 @@ int ext4_mb_init(struct super_block *sb)
 	sbi->s_mb_stream_request = MB_DEFAULT_STREAM_THRESHOLD;
 	sbi->s_mb_order2_reqs = MB_DEFAULT_ORDER2_REQS;
 	sbi->s_mb_max_inode_prealloc = MB_DEFAULT_MAX_INODE_PREALLOC;
+	sbi->s_mb_cr1_5_max_trim_order = MB_DEFAULT_CR1_5_TRIM_ORDER;
+
 	/*
 	 * The default group preallocation is 512, which for 4k block
 	 * sizes translates to 2 megabytes.  However for bigalloc file
@@ -4218,6 +4299,7 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	 * placement or satisfy big request as is */
 	ac->ac_g_ex.fe_logical = start;
 	ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, size);
+	ac->ac_orig_goal_len = ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len;
 
 	/* define goal start in order to merge */
 	if (ar->pright && (ar->lright == (start + size))) {
@@ -4258,8 +4340,10 @@ static void ext4_mb_collect_stats(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 		if (ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start == ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start &&
 				ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group == ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group)
 			atomic_inc(&sbi->s_bal_goals);
-		if (ac->ac_f_ex.fe_len == ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len)
+		/* did we allocate as much as normalizer originally wanted? */
+		if (ac->ac_f_ex.fe_len == ac->ac_orig_goal_len)
 			atomic_inc(&sbi->s_bal_len_goals);
+
 		if (ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_max_to_scan)
 			atomic_inc(&sbi->s_bal_breaks);
 	}
@@ -4652,7 +4736,7 @@ ext4_mb_new_inode_pa(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 
 	pa = ac->ac_pa;
 
-	if (ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len < ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len) {
+	if (ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len < ac->ac_orig_goal_len) {
 		int winl;
 		int wins;
 		int win;
@@ -5281,6 +5365,7 @@ ext4_mb_initialize_context(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	ac->ac_o_ex.fe_start = block;
 	ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len = len;
 	ac->ac_g_ex = ac->ac_o_ex;
+	ac->ac_orig_goal_len = ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len;
 	ac->ac_flags = ar->flags;
 
 	/* we have to define context: we'll work with a file or
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
index 004b8d163cc9..c1b0bf2f6f4d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
@@ -90,6 +90,13 @@
  */
 #define MB_DEFAULT_LINEAR_SCAN_THRESHOLD	16
 
+/*
+ * The maximum order upto which CR1.5 can trim a particular allocation request.
+ * Example, if we have an order 7 request and max trim order of 3, CR1.5 can
+ * trim this upto order 4.
+ */
+#define MB_DEFAULT_CR1_5_TRIM_ORDER	3
+
 /*
  * Number of valid buddy orders
  */
@@ -101,6 +108,7 @@
 enum criteria {
 	CR0,
 	CR1,
+	CR1_5,
 	CR2,
 	CR3,
 };
@@ -188,6 +196,12 @@ struct ext4_allocation_context {
 	/* copy of the best found extent taken before preallocation efforts */
 	struct ext4_free_extent ac_f_ex;
 
+	/*
+	 * goal len can change in CR1.5, so save the original len. This is
+	 * used while adjusting the PA window and for accounting.
+	 */
+	ext4_grpblk_t	ac_orig_goal_len;
+
 	__u32 ac_groups_considered;
 	__u32 ac_flags;		/* allocation hints */
 	__u16 ac_groups_scanned;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
index d233c24ea342..5ba884a0246e 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(warning_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_warning_ratelimit_state.int
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(warning_ratelimit_burst, s_warning_ratelimit_state.burst);
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(msg_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_msg_ratelimit_state.interval);
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(msg_ratelimit_burst, s_msg_ratelimit_state.burst);
+EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_cr1_5_max_trim_order, s_mb_cr1_5_max_trim_order);
 #ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG
 EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UL(simulate_fail, s_simulate_fail);
 #endif
@@ -275,6 +276,7 @@ static struct attribute *ext4_attrs[] = {
 	ATTR_LIST(warning_ratelimit_burst),
 	ATTR_LIST(msg_ratelimit_interval_ms),
 	ATTR_LIST(msg_ratelimit_burst),
+	ATTR_LIST(mb_cr1_5_max_trim_order),
 	ATTR_LIST(errors_count),
 	ATTR_LIST(warning_count),
 	ATTR_LIST(msg_count),
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-27 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-27 12:37 [RFC 00/11] multiblock allocator improvements Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 01/11] ext4: mballoc: Remove useless setting of ac_criteria Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 11:36   ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 02/11] ext4: Remove unused extern variables declaration Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 11:37   ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 03/11] ext4: mballoc: Fix getting the right group desc in ext4_mb_prefetch_fini Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 11:42   ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 04/11] ext4: Convert mballoc cr (criteria) to enum Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:11   ` Jan Kara
2023-03-17 10:26     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-23 10:55       ` Jan Kara
2023-03-25 14:42         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-04-20  6:32           ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-04-20 14:58             ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 05/11] ext4: Add per CR extent scanned counter Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:14   ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 06/11] ext4: Add counter to track successful allocation of goal length Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:17   ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 07/11] ext4: Avoid scanning smaller extents in BG during CR1 Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:20   ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 08/11] ext4: Don't skip prefetching BLOCK_UNINIT groups Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 14:14   ` Jan Kara
2023-03-17 10:55     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-23 10:57       ` Jan Kara
2023-03-25 14:43         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-26  3:54       ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 09/11] ext4: Ensure ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() is called for all prefetched BGs Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 14:23   ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 10/11] ext4: Abstract out logic to search average fragment list Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 14:25   ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` Ojaswin Mujoo [this message]
2023-03-09 15:06   ` [RFC 11/11] ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5) Jan Kara
2023-03-17 11:37     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-23 11:05       ` Jan Kara
2023-03-25 14:46         ` Ojaswin Mujoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=08173ee255f70cdc8de9ac3aa2e851f9d74acb12.1674822312.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.