All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kernel@sberdevices.ru>, <oxffffaa@gmail.com>,
	<avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] virtio/vsock: allocate multiple skbuffs on tx
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 21:35:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b841161-1fd2-584e-4920-40644b4b4a7e@sberdevices.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0b283a1-cc63-dc3d-cc0c-0da7f684d4d2@sberdevices.ru>

This adds small optimization for tx path: instead of allocating single
skbuff on every call to transport, allocate multiple skbuff's until
credit space allows, thus trying to send as much as possible data without
return to af_vsock.c.

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 6564192e7f20..9e87c7d4d7cf 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 	const struct virtio_transport *t_ops;
 	struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs;
 	u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len;
-	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	u32 rest_len;
+	int ret;
 
 	info->type = virtio_transport_get_type(sk_vsock(vsk));
 
@@ -216,10 +217,6 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 
 	vvs = vsk->trans;
 
-	/* we can send less than pkt_len bytes */
-	if (pkt_len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE)
-		pkt_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE;
-
 	/* virtio_transport_get_credit might return less than pkt_len credit */
 	pkt_len = virtio_transport_get_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
 
@@ -227,17 +224,49 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 	if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
 		return pkt_len;
 
-	skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, pkt_len,
-					 src_cid, src_port,
-					 dst_cid, dst_port);
-	if (!skb) {
-		virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	rest_len = pkt_len;
+
+	do {
+		struct sk_buff *skb;
+		size_t skb_len;
+
+		skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, rest_len);
+
+		skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, skb_len,
+						 src_cid, src_port,
+						 dst_cid, dst_port);
+		if (!skb) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			break;
+		}
 
-	virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
+		virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
 
-	return t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
+		ret = t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			break;
+
+		/* Both virtio and vhost 'send_pkt()' returns 'skb_len',
+		 * but for reliability use 'ret' instead of 'skb_len'.
+		 * Also if partial send happens (e.g. 'ret' != 'skb_len')
+		 * somehow, we break this loop, but account such returned
+		 * value in 'virtio_transport_put_credit()'.
+		 */
+		rest_len -= ret;
+
+		if (WARN_ONCE(ret != skb_len,
+			      "'send_pkt()' returns %i, but %zu expected\n",
+			      ret, skb_len))
+			break;
+	} while (rest_len);
+
+	virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, rest_len);
+
+	/* Return number of bytes, if any data has been sent. */
+	if (rest_len != pkt_len)
+		ret = pkt_len - rest_len;
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
-- 
2.25.1

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-22 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-22 18:34 [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-22 18:35 ` Arseniy Krasnov [this message]
2023-03-22 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] virtio/vsock: check argument to avoid no effect call Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-23  9:29   ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-23  9:29     ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-23 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] allocate multiple skbuffs on tx Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-23 10:48   ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-23 10:48     ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-23 10:53     ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-23 11:11       ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-23 11:11         ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-23 11:34         ` Arseniy Krasnov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b841161-1fd2-584e-4920-40644b4b4a7e@sberdevices.ru \
    --to=avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.