All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Yariv <ido@wizery.com>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ido Yariv <ido@wizery.com>
Subject: [PATCH] hwspinlock/core: Add testing capabilities
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:27:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1355344026-17222-1-git-send-email-ido@wizery.com> (raw)

Add testing capabilities for verifying correctness of the underlying
hwspinlock layers. This can be handy especially during development.
These tests are performed only once as part of the hwspinlock
registration.

Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <ido@wizery.com>
---
 drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig           |    9 +++++
 drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
index c7c3128..ad632cd 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
@@ -8,6 +8,15 @@ config HWSPINLOCK
 
 menu "Hardware Spinlock drivers"
 
+config HWSPINLOCK_TEST
+	bool "Verify underlying hwspinlock implementation"
+	depends on HWSPINLOCK
+	help
+	  Say Y here to perform tests on the underlying hwspinlock
+	  implementation. The tests are only performed once per implementation.
+
+	  Say N, unless you absolutely know what you are doing.
+
 config HWSPINLOCK_OMAP
 	tristate "OMAP Hardware Spinlock device"
 	depends on ARCH_OMAP4
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
index 085e28e..1874e85 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
@@ -307,6 +307,53 @@ out:
 	return hwlock;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_TEST
+#define NUM_OF_TEST_ITERATIONS 100
+static int hwspin_lock_tests(const struct hwspinlock_ops *ops,
+			     struct hwspinlock *hwlock)
+{
+	int i;
+	int ret;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < NUM_OF_TEST_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+		ret = ops->trylock(hwlock);
+		if (!ret) {
+			pr_err("%s: Initial lock failed\n", __func__);
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
+
+		/* Verify lock actually works - re-acquiring it should fail */
+		ret = ops->trylock(hwlock);
+		if (ret) {
+			/* Keep locks balanced even in failure cases */
+			ops->unlock(hwlock);
+			ops->unlock(hwlock);
+			pr_err("%s: Recursive lock succeeded unexpectedly\n",
+			       __func__);
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
+
+		/* Verify unlock by re-acquiring the lock after releasing it */
+		ops->unlock(hwlock);
+		ret = ops->trylock(hwlock);
+		if (!ret) {
+			pr_err("%s: Unlock failed\n", __func__);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		ops->unlock(hwlock);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_TEST*/
+static int hwspin_lock_tests(const struct hwspinlock_ops *ops,
+			     struct hwspinlock *hwlock)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * hwspin_lock_register() - register a new hw spinlock device
  * @bank: the hwspinlock device, which usually provides numerous hw locks
@@ -345,6 +392,13 @@ int hwspin_lock_register(struct hwspinlock_device *bank, struct device *dev,
 		spin_lock_init(&hwlock->lock);
 		hwlock->bank = bank;
 
+		ret = hwspin_lock_tests(ops, hwlock);
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_err("hwspinlock tests failed on lock %d\n",
+			       base_id + i);
+			goto reg_failed;
+		}
+
 		ret = hwspin_lock_register_single(hwlock, base_id + i);
 		if (ret)
 			goto reg_failed;
-- 
1.7.7.6


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ido@wizery.com (Ido Yariv)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] hwspinlock/core: Add testing capabilities
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:27:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1355344026-17222-1-git-send-email-ido@wizery.com> (raw)

Add testing capabilities for verifying correctness of the underlying
hwspinlock layers. This can be handy especially during development.
These tests are performed only once as part of the hwspinlock
registration.

Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <ido@wizery.com>
---
 drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig           |    9 +++++
 drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
index c7c3128..ad632cd 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
@@ -8,6 +8,15 @@ config HWSPINLOCK
 
 menu "Hardware Spinlock drivers"
 
+config HWSPINLOCK_TEST
+	bool "Verify underlying hwspinlock implementation"
+	depends on HWSPINLOCK
+	help
+	  Say Y here to perform tests on the underlying hwspinlock
+	  implementation. The tests are only performed once per implementation.
+
+	  Say N, unless you absolutely know what you are doing.
+
 config HWSPINLOCK_OMAP
 	tristate "OMAP Hardware Spinlock device"
 	depends on ARCH_OMAP4
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
index 085e28e..1874e85 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
@@ -307,6 +307,53 @@ out:
 	return hwlock;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_TEST
+#define NUM_OF_TEST_ITERATIONS 100
+static int hwspin_lock_tests(const struct hwspinlock_ops *ops,
+			     struct hwspinlock *hwlock)
+{
+	int i;
+	int ret;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < NUM_OF_TEST_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+		ret = ops->trylock(hwlock);
+		if (!ret) {
+			pr_err("%s: Initial lock failed\n", __func__);
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
+
+		/* Verify lock actually works - re-acquiring it should fail */
+		ret = ops->trylock(hwlock);
+		if (ret) {
+			/* Keep locks balanced even in failure cases */
+			ops->unlock(hwlock);
+			ops->unlock(hwlock);
+			pr_err("%s: Recursive lock succeeded unexpectedly\n",
+			       __func__);
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
+
+		/* Verify unlock by re-acquiring the lock after releasing it */
+		ops->unlock(hwlock);
+		ret = ops->trylock(hwlock);
+		if (!ret) {
+			pr_err("%s: Unlock failed\n", __func__);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		ops->unlock(hwlock);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK_TEST*/
+static int hwspin_lock_tests(const struct hwspinlock_ops *ops,
+			     struct hwspinlock *hwlock)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * hwspin_lock_register() - register a new hw spinlock device
  * @bank: the hwspinlock device, which usually provides numerous hw locks
@@ -345,6 +392,13 @@ int hwspin_lock_register(struct hwspinlock_device *bank, struct device *dev,
 		spin_lock_init(&hwlock->lock);
 		hwlock->bank = bank;
 
+		ret = hwspin_lock_tests(ops, hwlock);
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_err("hwspinlock tests failed on lock %d\n",
+			       base_id + i);
+			goto reg_failed;
+		}
+
 		ret = hwspin_lock_register_single(hwlock, base_id + i);
 		if (ret)
 			goto reg_failed;
-- 
1.7.7.6

             reply	other threads:[~2012-12-12 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 20:27 Ido Yariv [this message]
2012-12-12 20:27 ` [PATCH] hwspinlock/core: Add testing capabilities Ido Yariv
2012-12-29  9:19 steve.zhan
2012-12-30 11:20 ` Ido Yariv
2012-12-30 11:20   ` Ido Yariv
2012-12-30 14:13   ` steve.zhan
2012-12-30 14:13     ` steve.zhan
2012-12-30 14:27     ` Ido Yariv
2012-12-30 14:27       ` Ido Yariv
2012-12-30 14:56       ` steve.zhan
2012-12-30 15:17         ` Ido Yariv
2012-12-30 15:39           ` steve.zhan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1355344026-17222-1-git-send-email-ido@wizery.com \
    --to=ido@wizery.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.