From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> To: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] time : pass broadcast device parameter Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:01:22 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1361484083-5906-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5123C299.3080005@linaro.org> The broadcast timer could be passed as parameter to the function instead of using again tick_broadcast_device.evtdev which was previously used in the caller function. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> --- kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c index f113755..baf9b0e7 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c @@ -370,10 +370,9 @@ struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask(void) return to_cpumask(tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask); } -static int tick_broadcast_set_event(ktime_t expires, int force) +static int tick_broadcast_set_event(struct clock_event_device *bc, + ktime_t expires, int force) { - struct clock_event_device *bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev; - if (bc->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT) clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT); @@ -443,7 +442,7 @@ again: * Rearm the broadcast device. If event expired, * repeat the above */ - if (tick_broadcast_set_event(next_event, 0)) + if (tick_broadcast_set_event(dev, next_event, 0)) goto again; } raw_spin_unlock(&tick_broadcast_lock); @@ -486,7 +485,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_oneshot_control(unsigned long reason) cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask()); clockevents_set_mode(dev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN); if (dev->next_event.tv64 < bc->next_event.tv64) - tick_broadcast_set_event(dev->next_event, 1); + tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, dev->next_event, 1); } } else { if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask())) { @@ -555,7 +554,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *bc) clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT); tick_broadcast_init_next_event(to_cpumask(tmpmask), tick_next_period); - tick_broadcast_set_event(tick_next_period, 1); + tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, tick_next_period, 1); } else bc->next_event.tv64 = KTIME_MAX; } else { -- 1.7.9.5
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] time : pass broadcast device parameter Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:01:22 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1361484083-5906-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5123C299.3080005@linaro.org> The broadcast timer could be passed as parameter to the function instead of using again tick_broadcast_device.evtdev which was previously used in the caller function. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> --- kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c index f113755..baf9b0e7 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c @@ -370,10 +370,9 @@ struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask(void) return to_cpumask(tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask); } -static int tick_broadcast_set_event(ktime_t expires, int force) +static int tick_broadcast_set_event(struct clock_event_device *bc, + ktime_t expires, int force) { - struct clock_event_device *bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev; - if (bc->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT) clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT); @@ -443,7 +442,7 @@ again: * Rearm the broadcast device. If event expired, * repeat the above */ - if (tick_broadcast_set_event(next_event, 0)) + if (tick_broadcast_set_event(dev, next_event, 0)) goto again; } raw_spin_unlock(&tick_broadcast_lock); @@ -486,7 +485,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_oneshot_control(unsigned long reason) cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask()); clockevents_set_mode(dev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN); if (dev->next_event.tv64 < bc->next_event.tv64) - tick_broadcast_set_event(dev->next_event, 1); + tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, dev->next_event, 1); } } else { if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask())) { @@ -555,7 +554,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *bc) clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT); tick_broadcast_init_next_event(to_cpumask(tmpmask), tick_next_period); - tick_broadcast_set_event(tick_next_period, 1); + tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, tick_next_period, 1); } else bc->next_event.tv64 = KTIME_MAX; } else { -- 1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-21 22:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-02-19 18:02 [resend] Timer broadcast question Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-19 18:10 ` Thomas Gleixner 2013-02-19 18:21 ` Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-19 22:46 ` Andy Lutomirski 2013-02-20 10:09 ` Thomas Gleixner 2013-02-21 6:19 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-21 6:19 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-21 9:01 ` Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-21 9:01 ` Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-21 9:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-21 9:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-21 22:01 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message] 2013-02-21 22:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] time : pass broadcast device parameter Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-21 22:01 ` [PATCH 2/2][RFC] time : set broadcast irq affinity Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-21 22:01 ` Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-22 17:55 ` Jacob Pan 2013-02-22 17:55 ` Jacob Pan 2013-02-22 18:45 ` Thomas Gleixner 2013-02-22 18:45 ` Thomas Gleixner 2013-02-25 22:50 ` Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-25 22:50 ` Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-25 23:00 ` Jacob Pan 2013-02-25 23:00 ` Jacob Pan 2013-02-26 8:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] time : pass broadcast device parameter Viresh Kumar 2013-02-26 8:45 ` Viresh Kumar 2013-02-26 11:30 ` Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-26 11:30 ` Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-26 11:31 ` Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-26 11:31 ` Daniel Lezcano 2013-02-26 12:14 ` Viresh Kumar 2013-02-26 12:14 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1361484083-5906-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \ --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \ --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \ --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \ --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.