[PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: fix hpd interrupt register locking

[Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>]

Our interrupt handler (in hardirq context) could race with the timer
(in softirq context), hence we need to hold the spinlock around the
call to ->hdp_irq_setup in intel_hpd_irq_handler, too.

But as an optimization (and more so to clarify things) we don't need
to do the irqsave/restore dance in the hardirq context.

Note also that on ilk+ the race isn't just against the hotplug
reenable timer, but also against the fifo underrun reporting. That one
also modifies the SDEIMR register (again protected by the same
dev_priv->irq_lock).

To lock things down again sprinkle a assert_spin_locked. But exclude
the functions touching SDEIMR for now, I want to extract them all into
a new helper function (like we do already for pipestate, display
interrupts and all the various gt interrupts).

v2: Add the missing 't' Egbert spotted in a comment.

v3: Actually fix the right misspelled comment (Paulo).

Cc: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index a924f72..9f3d65b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -881,15 +881,13 @@ static inline void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev,
 					 const u32 *hpd)
 {
 	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
-	unsigned long irqflags;
 	int i;
 	bool storm_detected = false;
 
 	if (!hotplug_trigger)
 		return;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
-
+	spin_lock(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
 	for (i = 1; i < HPD_NUM_PINS; i++) {
 
 		if (!(hpd[i] & hotplug_trigger) ||
@@ -912,10 +910,9 @@ static inline void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev,
 		}
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
-
 	if (storm_detected)
 		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev);
+	spin_unlock(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
 
 	queue_work(dev_priv->wq,
 		   &dev_priv->hotplug_work);
@@ -3395,6 +3392,8 @@ static void i915_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
 	struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder;
 	u32 hotplug_en;
 
+	assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
+
 	if (I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(dev)) {
 		hotplug_en = I915_READ(PORT_HOTPLUG_EN);
 		hotplug_en &= ~HOTPLUG_INT_EN_MASK;
@@ -3678,6 +3677,7 @@ void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	struct drm_mode_config *mode_config = &dev->mode_config;
 	struct drm_connector *connector;
+	unsigned long irqflags;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 1; i < HPD_NUM_PINS; i++) {
@@ -3690,6 +3690,11 @@ void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 		if (!connector->polled && I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(dev) && intel_connector->encoder->hpd_pin > HPD_NONE)
 			connector->polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
 	}
+
+	/* Interrupt setup is already guaranteed to be single-threaded, this is
+	 * just to make the assert_spin_locked checks happy. */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
 	if (dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup)
 		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
 }
-- 
1.8.1.4