All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 21/23] mm/ARM: kernel: Use memblock apis for early memory allocations
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:50:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386625856-12942-22-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386625856-12942-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Switch to memblock interfaces for early memory allocator instead of
bootmem allocator. No functional change in beahvior than what it is
in current code from bootmem users points of view.

Archs already converted to NO_BOOTMEM now directly use memblock
interfaces instead of bootmem wrappers build on top of memblock. And the
archs which still uses bootmem, these new apis just fallback to exiting
bootmem APIs.

Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c   |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
index 739c3df..5a0041e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void __init early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
 
 void * __init early_init_dt_alloc_memory_arch(u64 size, u64 align)
 {
-	return alloc_bootmem_align(size, align);
+	return memblock_virt_alloc(size, align);
 }
 
 void __init arm_dt_memblock_reserve(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
index 6a1b8a8..fffb978 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static void __init request_standard_resources(const struct machine_desc *mdesc)
 	kernel_data.end     = virt_to_phys(_end - 1);
 
 	for_each_memblock(memory, region) {
-		res = alloc_bootmem_low(sizeof(*res));
+		res = memblock_virt_alloc(sizeof(*res), 0);
 		res->name  = "System RAM";
 		res->start = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(region));
 		res->end = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(region)) - 1;
-- 
1.7.9.5


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 21/23] mm/ARM: kernel: Use memblock apis for early memory allocations
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:50:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386625856-12942-22-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386625856-12942-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Switch to memblock interfaces for early memory allocator instead of
bootmem allocator. No functional change in beahvior than what it is
in current code from bootmem users points of view.

Archs already converted to NO_BOOTMEM now directly use memblock
interfaces instead of bootmem wrappers build on top of memblock. And the
archs which still uses bootmem, these new apis just fallback to exiting
bootmem APIs.

Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c   |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
index 739c3df..5a0041e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void __init early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
 
 void * __init early_init_dt_alloc_memory_arch(u64 size, u64 align)
 {
-	return alloc_bootmem_align(size, align);
+	return memblock_virt_alloc(size, align);
 }
 
 void __init arm_dt_memblock_reserve(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
index 6a1b8a8..fffb978 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static void __init request_standard_resources(const struct machine_desc *mdesc)
 	kernel_data.end     = virt_to_phys(_end - 1);
 
 	for_each_memblock(memory, region) {
-		res = alloc_bootmem_low(sizeof(*res));
+		res = memblock_virt_alloc(sizeof(*res), 0);
 		res->name  = "System RAM";
 		res->start = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(region));
 		res->end = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(region)) - 1;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 21/23] mm/ARM: kernel: Use memblock apis for early memory allocations
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:50:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386625856-12942-22-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386625856-12942-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Switch to memblock interfaces for early memory allocator instead of
bootmem allocator. No functional change in beahvior than what it is
in current code from bootmem users points of view.

Archs already converted to NO_BOOTMEM now directly use memblock
interfaces instead of bootmem wrappers build on top of memblock. And the
archs which still uses bootmem, these new apis just fallback to exiting
bootmem APIs.

Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c   |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
index 739c3df..5a0041e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void __init early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
 
 void * __init early_init_dt_alloc_memory_arch(u64 size, u64 align)
 {
-	return alloc_bootmem_align(size, align);
+	return memblock_virt_alloc(size, align);
 }
 
 void __init arm_dt_memblock_reserve(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
index 6a1b8a8..fffb978 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static void __init request_standard_resources(const struct machine_desc *mdesc)
 	kernel_data.end     = virt_to_phys(_end - 1);
 
 	for_each_memblock(memory, region) {
-		res = alloc_bootmem_low(sizeof(*res));
+		res = memblock_virt_alloc(sizeof(*res), 0);
 		res->name  = "System RAM";
 		res->start = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(region));
 		res->end = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(region)) - 1;
-- 
1.7.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-09 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-09 21:50 [PATCH v3 00/23] mm: Use memblock interface instead of bootmem Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] mm/memblock: debug: correct displaying of upper memory boundary Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:56   ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-09 21:56     ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-09 21:56     ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-09 22:39     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 22:39       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 22:39       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] mm/memblock: debug: don't free reserved array if !ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-10  0:11   ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-10  0:11     ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-10  0:11     ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-10 16:44     ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-10 16:44       ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-10 16:44       ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] mm/bootmem: remove duplicated declaration of __free_pages_bootmem() Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] mm/memblock: remove unnecessary inclusions of bootmem.h Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] mm/memblock: drop WARN and use SMP_CACHE_BYTES as a default alignment Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13 21:21   ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 21:21     ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 21:21     ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] mm/memblock: reorder parameters of memblock_find_in_range_node Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13 21:22   ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 21:22     ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 21:22     ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] mm/memblock: switch to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13 21:29   ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 21:29     ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 21:29     ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-14  0:44     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14  0:44       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14  0:44       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] mm/memblock: Add memblock memory allocation apis Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-10  0:25   ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-10  0:25     ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-10  0:25     ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-10 16:04     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-10 16:04       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-10 16:04       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13 21:37   ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 21:37     ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 21:37     ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-14  0:52     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14  0:52       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14  0:52       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14 11:08       ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-14 11:08         ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-14 11:08         ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-14 19:48         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14 19:48           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14 19:48           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-20 22:30           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-20 22:30             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-20 22:30             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] mm/init: Use memblock apis for early memory allocations Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] mm/printk: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] mm/page_alloc: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] mm/power: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] mm/lib/swiotlb: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13  1:08   ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-13  1:08     ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-13  1:24     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13  1:24       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-13  1:24       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] mm/lib/cpumask: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] mm/sparse: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] mm/hugetlb: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] mm/page_cgroup: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] mm/percpu: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] mm/memory_hotplug: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] mm/firmware: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-12-09 21:50   ` [PATCH v3 21/23] mm/ARM: kernel: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] mm/ARM: mm: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] mm/ARM: OMAP: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-09 21:50   ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1386625856-12942-22-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.