From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH STABLE 4.9 4.14] btrfs: reject log replay if there is unsupported RO compat flag
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 13:51:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13ad48d4d5245d935d182173e5d77a6a4b09fd1f.1660456302.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
commit dc4d31684974d140250f3ee612c3f0cab13b3146 upstream.
[BUG]
If we have a btrfs image with dirty log, along with an unsupported RO
compatible flag:
log_root 30474240
...
compat_flags 0x0
compat_ro_flags 0x40000003
( FREE_SPACE_TREE |
FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID |
unknown flag: 0x40000000 )
Then even if we can only mount it RO, we will still cause metadata
update for log replay:
BTRFS info (device dm-1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
BTRFS info (device dm-1): using free space tree
BTRFS info (device dm-1): has skinny extents
BTRFS info (device dm-1): start tree-log replay
This is definitely against RO compact flag requirement.
[CAUSE]
RO compact flag only forces us to do RO mount, but we will still do log
replay for plain RO mount.
Thus this will result us to do log replay and update metadata.
This can be very problematic for new RO compat flag, for example older
kernel can not understand v2 cache, and if we allow metadata update on
RO mount and invalidate/corrupt v2 cache.
[FIX]
Just reject the mount unless rescue=nologreplay is provided:
BTRFS error (device dm-1): cannot replay dirty log with unsupport optional features (0x40000000), try rescue=nologreplay instead
We don't want to set rescue=nologreply directly, as this would make the
end user to read the old data, and cause confusion.
Since the such case is really rare, we're mostly fine to just reject the
mount with an error message, which also includes the proper workaround.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.9 4.14
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 46ecb7405af1..b83e96f51a5f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -2774,6 +2774,20 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
err = -EINVAL;
goto fail_alloc;
}
+ /*
+ * We have unsupported RO compat features, although RO mounted, we
+ * should not cause any metadata write, including log replay.
+ * Or we could screw up whatever the new feature requires.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(features && btrfs_super_log_root(disk_super) &&
+ !btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, NOLOGREPLAY))) {
+ btrfs_err(fs_info,
+"cannot replay dirty log with unsupported compat_ro features (0x%llx), try rescue=nologreplay",
+ features);
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto fail_alloc;
+ }
+
max_active = fs_info->thread_pool_size;
--
2.37.1
reply other threads:[~2022-08-14 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13ad48d4d5245d935d182173e5d77a6a4b09fd1f.1660456302.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.