[PATCH] arm: exynos: Modify pm code to check for cortex A9 rather than the SoC

From: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>
To: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
	t.figa@samsung.com
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm: exynos: Modify pm code to check for cortex A9 rather than the SoC
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 08:31:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400814061-12813-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> (raw)

We have an soc check to ensure that the scu and certain A9 specific
registers are not accessed on Exynos5250 (which is A15 based).
Rather than adding another soc specific check for 5420 let us test
for the Cortex A9 primary part number.

This resolves the below crash seen on exynos5420 during core switching
after the CPUIdle consolidation series was merged.

[  155.975589] [<c0013174>] (scu_enable) from [<c001b0dc>] (exynos_cpu_pm_notifier+0x80/0xc4)
[  155.983833] [<c001b0dc>] (exynos_cpu_pm_notifier) from [<c003c1b0>] (notifier_call_chain+0x44/0x84)
[  155.992851] [<c003c1b0>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c007a49c>] (cpu_pm_notify+0x20/0x3c)
[  156.001089] [<c007a49c>] (cpu_pm_notify) from [<c007a564>] (cpu_pm_exit+0x20/0x38)
[  156.008635] [<c007a564>] (cpu_pm_exit) from [<c0019e98>] (bL_switcher_thread+0x298/0x40c)
[  156.016788] [<c0019e98>] (bL_switcher_thread) from [<c003842c>] (kthread+0xcc/0xe8)
[  156.024426] [<c003842c>] (kthread) from [<c000e438>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c)
[  156.031621] Code: ea017fec c0530a00 c052e3f8 c0012dcc (e5903000

Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c |   15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
index d10c351..6dd4a11 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int exynos_pm_suspend(void)
 	tmp = (S5P_USE_STANDBY_WFI0 | S5P_USE_STANDBY_WFE0);
 	__raw_writel(tmp, S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION);
 
-	if (!soc_is_exynos5250())
+	if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
 		exynos_cpu_save_register();
 
 	return 0;
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static void exynos_pm_resume(void)
 	if (exynos_pm_central_resume())
 		goto early_wakeup;
 
-	if (!soc_is_exynos5250())
+	if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
 		exynos_cpu_restore_register();
 
 	/* For release retention */
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static void exynos_pm_resume(void)
 
 	s3c_pm_do_restore_core(exynos_core_save, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_core_save));
 
-	if (!soc_is_exynos5250())
+	if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
 		scu_enable(S5P_VA_SCU);
 
 early_wakeup:
@@ -440,15 +440,18 @@ static int exynos_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
 	case CPU_PM_ENTER:
 		if (cpu == 0) {
 			exynos_pm_central_suspend();
-			exynos_cpu_save_register();
+			if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
+				exynos_cpu_save_register();
 		}
 		break;
 
 	case CPU_PM_EXIT:
 		if (cpu == 0) {
-			if (!soc_is_exynos5250())
+			if (read_cpuid_part_number() ==
+					ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
 				scu_enable(S5P_VA_SCU);
-			exynos_cpu_restore_register();
+				exynos_cpu_restore_register();
+			}
 			exynos_pm_central_resume();
 		}
 		break;
-- 
1.7.9.5
