All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
To: bfields@fieldses.org
Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 05/10] nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected by clp->cl_lock
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:13:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405696416-32585-6-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405696416-32585-1-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com>

Currently, both destroy_revoked_delegation and revoke_delegation
manipulate the cl_revoked list without any locking aside from the
client_mutex. Ensure that the clp->cl_lock is held when manipulating it,
except for the list walking in destroy_client. At that point, the client
should no longer be in use, and so it should be safe to walk the list
without any locking. That also means that we don't need to do the
list_splice_init there either.

Also, the fact that destroy_revoked_delegation and revoke_delegation
delete dl_recall_lru without any locking makes it difficult to know
whether they're doing so safely in all cases. Move the list_del_init
calls into the callers, and add WARN_ONs in the event that these calls
are passed a delegation that has a non-empty list_head.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 7c5233427c9b..d11b298e625e 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ unhash_delegation_locked(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
 
 static void destroy_revoked_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
 {
-	list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dp->dl_recall_lru));
 	nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
 }
 
@@ -685,11 +685,15 @@ static void revoke_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
 {
 	struct nfs4_client *clp = dp->dl_stid.sc_client;
 
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dp->dl_recall_lru));
+
 	if (clp->cl_minorversion == 0)
 		destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
 	else {
 		dp->dl_stid.sc_type = NFS4_REVOKED_DELEG_STID;
-		list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &clp->cl_revoked);
+		spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
+		list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &clp->cl_revoked);
+		spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1458,9 +1462,9 @@ destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
 		list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
 		nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
 	}
-	list_splice_init(&clp->cl_revoked, &reaplist);
-	while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
+	while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_revoked)) {
 		dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
+		list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
 		destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
 	}
 	while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_openowners)) {
@@ -3899,8 +3903,10 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
 		list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&state_lock);
-	list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &reaplist) {
-		dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
+	while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
+		dp = list_first_entry(&reaplist, struct nfs4_delegation,
+					dl_recall_lru);
+		list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
 		revoke_delegation(dp);
 	}
 	list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &nn->close_lru) {
@@ -4244,6 +4250,9 @@ nfsd4_free_stateid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
 		break;
 	case NFS4_REVOKED_DELEG_STID:
 		dp = delegstateid(s);
+		spin_lock(&cl->cl_lock);
+		list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
+		spin_unlock(&cl->cl_lock);
 		destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
 		ret = nfs_ok;
 		break;
-- 
1.9.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-18 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-18 15:13 [PATCH v4 00/10] nfsd: more delegation fixes to prepare for client_mutex removal Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] nfsd: Protect the nfs4_file delegation fields using the fi_lock Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 18:46     ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 16:28   ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-18 17:31     ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 17:49       ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-18 19:04         ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 19:21           ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-18 19:32             ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 19:35               ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-21 21:05             ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-21 21:12               ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] nfsd: Move the delegation reference counter into the struct nfs4_stid Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] nfsd: simplify stateid allocation and file handling Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] nfsd: Fix delegation revocation Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 16:44   ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-18 17:24     ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-07-18 15:57   ` [PATCH v4 05/10] nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected by clp->cl_lock Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] nfsd: Convert delegation counter to an atomic_long_t type Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] nfsd: drop unused stp arg to alloc_init_deleg Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] nfsd: clean up arguments to nfs4_open_delegation Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:57   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] nfsd: clean up nfs4_set_delegation Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 17:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 17:23     ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] nfsd: give block_delegation and delegation_blocked its own spinlock Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 17:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-21  7:02   ` NeilBrown
2014-07-21 11:44     ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-21 13:11       ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-21 13:23         ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-21 20:40       ` NeilBrown
2014-07-21 21:17         ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-21 22:50           ` NeilBrown
2014-07-22 15:00             ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1405696416-32585-6-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com \
    --to=jlayton@primarydata.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.