All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.cz, clm@fb.com,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, gthelen@google.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/18] writeback: reorganize [__]wb_update_bandwidth()
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 01:07:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1427087267-16592-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427087267-16592-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

__wb_update_bandwidth() is called from two places -
fs/fs-writeback.c::balance_dirty_pages() and
mm/page-writeback.c::wb_writeback().  The latter updates only the
write bandwidth while the former also deals with the dirty ratelimit.
The two callsites are distinguished by whether @thresh parameter is
zero or not, which is cryptic.  In addition, the two files define
their own different versions of wb_update_bandwidth() on top of
__wb_update_bandwidth(), which is confusing to say the least.  This
patch cleans up [__]wb_update_bandwidth() in the following ways.

* __wb_update_bandwidth() now takes explicit @update_ratelimit
  parameter to gate dirty ratelimit handling.

* mm/page-writeback.c::wb_update_bandwidth() is flattened into its
  caller - balance_dirty_pages().

* fs/fs-writeback.c::wb_update_bandwidth() is moved to
  mm/page-writeback.c and __wb_update_bandwidth() is made static.

* While at it, add a lockdep assertion to __wb_update_bandwidth().

Except for the lockdep addition, this is pure reorganization and
doesn't introduce any behavioral changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c         | 10 ----------
 include/linux/writeback.h |  9 +--------
 mm/page-writeback.c       | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 890cff1..3d9b360 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1079,16 +1079,6 @@ static bool over_bground_thresh(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 }
 
 /*
- * Called under wb->list_lock. If there are multiple wb per bdi,
- * only the flusher working on the first wb should do it.
- */
-static void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
-				unsigned long start_time)
-{
-	__wb_update_bandwidth(wb, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, start_time);
-}
-
-/*
  * Explicit flushing or periodic writeback of "old" data.
  *
  * Define "old": the first time one of an inode's pages is dirtied, we mark the
diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index 75349bb..82e0e39 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -154,14 +154,7 @@ int dirty_writeback_centisecs_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
 void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty);
 unsigned long wb_dirty_limit(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long dirty);
 
-void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
-			   unsigned long thresh,
-			   unsigned long bg_thresh,
-			   unsigned long dirty,
-			   unsigned long bdi_thresh,
-			   unsigned long bdi_dirty,
-			   unsigned long start_time);
-
+void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long start_time);
 void page_writeback_init(void);
 void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(struct address_space *mapping);
 
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index fd441ea..d9ebabe 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1160,19 +1160,22 @@ static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 	trace_bdi_dirty_ratelimit(wb->bdi, dirty_rate, task_ratelimit);
 }
 
-void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
-			   unsigned long thresh,
-			   unsigned long bg_thresh,
-			   unsigned long dirty,
-			   unsigned long wb_thresh,
-			   unsigned long wb_dirty,
-			   unsigned long start_time)
+static void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
+				  unsigned long thresh,
+				  unsigned long bg_thresh,
+				  unsigned long dirty,
+				  unsigned long wb_thresh,
+				  unsigned long wb_dirty,
+				  unsigned long start_time,
+				  bool update_ratelimit)
 {
 	unsigned long now = jiffies;
 	unsigned long elapsed = now - wb->bw_time_stamp;
 	unsigned long dirtied;
 	unsigned long written;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&wb->list_lock);
+
 	/*
 	 * rate-limit, only update once every 200ms.
 	 */
@@ -1189,7 +1192,7 @@ void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 	if (elapsed > HZ && time_before(wb->bw_time_stamp, start_time))
 		goto snapshot;
 
-	if (thresh) {
+	if (update_ratelimit) {
 		global_update_bandwidth(thresh, dirty, now);
 		wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(wb, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
 					  wb_thresh, wb_dirty,
@@ -1203,20 +1206,9 @@ snapshot:
 	wb->bw_time_stamp = now;
 }
 
-static void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
-				unsigned long thresh,
-				unsigned long bg_thresh,
-				unsigned long dirty,
-				unsigned long wb_thresh,
-				unsigned long wb_dirty,
-				unsigned long start_time)
+void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long start_time)
 {
-	if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(wb->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
-		return;
-	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
-	__wb_update_bandwidth(wb, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
-			      wb_thresh, wb_dirty, start_time);
-	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+	__wb_update_bandwidth(wb, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, start_time, false);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1467,8 +1459,15 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
 		if (dirty_exceeded && !wb->dirty_exceeded)
 			wb->dirty_exceeded = 1;
 
-		wb_update_bandwidth(wb, dirty_thresh, background_thresh,
-				    nr_dirty, wb_thresh, wb_dirty, start_time);
+		if (time_is_before_jiffies(wb->bw_time_stamp +
+					   BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)) {
+			spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
+			__wb_update_bandwidth(wb, dirty_thresh,
+					      background_thresh, nr_dirty,
+					      wb_thresh, wb_dirty, start_time,
+					      true);
+			spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+		}
 
 		dirty_ratelimit = wb->dirty_ratelimit;
 		pos_ratio = wb_position_ratio(wb, dirty_thresh,
-- 
2.1.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.cz, clm@fb.com,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, gthelen@google.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/18] writeback: reorganize [__]wb_update_bandwidth()
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 01:07:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1427087267-16592-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427087267-16592-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

__wb_update_bandwidth() is called from two places -
fs/fs-writeback.c::balance_dirty_pages() and
mm/page-writeback.c::wb_writeback().  The latter updates only the
write bandwidth while the former also deals with the dirty ratelimit.
The two callsites are distinguished by whether @thresh parameter is
zero or not, which is cryptic.  In addition, the two files define
their own different versions of wb_update_bandwidth() on top of
__wb_update_bandwidth(), which is confusing to say the least.  This
patch cleans up [__]wb_update_bandwidth() in the following ways.

* __wb_update_bandwidth() now takes explicit @update_ratelimit
  parameter to gate dirty ratelimit handling.

* mm/page-writeback.c::wb_update_bandwidth() is flattened into its
  caller - balance_dirty_pages().

* fs/fs-writeback.c::wb_update_bandwidth() is moved to
  mm/page-writeback.c and __wb_update_bandwidth() is made static.

* While at it, add a lockdep assertion to __wb_update_bandwidth().

Except for the lockdep addition, this is pure reorganization and
doesn't introduce any behavioral changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c         | 10 ----------
 include/linux/writeback.h |  9 +--------
 mm/page-writeback.c       | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 890cff1..3d9b360 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1079,16 +1079,6 @@ static bool over_bground_thresh(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 }
 
 /*
- * Called under wb->list_lock. If there are multiple wb per bdi,
- * only the flusher working on the first wb should do it.
- */
-static void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
-				unsigned long start_time)
-{
-	__wb_update_bandwidth(wb, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, start_time);
-}
-
-/*
  * Explicit flushing or periodic writeback of "old" data.
  *
  * Define "old": the first time one of an inode's pages is dirtied, we mark the
diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index 75349bb..82e0e39 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -154,14 +154,7 @@ int dirty_writeback_centisecs_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
 void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty);
 unsigned long wb_dirty_limit(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long dirty);
 
-void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
-			   unsigned long thresh,
-			   unsigned long bg_thresh,
-			   unsigned long dirty,
-			   unsigned long bdi_thresh,
-			   unsigned long bdi_dirty,
-			   unsigned long start_time);
-
+void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long start_time);
 void page_writeback_init(void);
 void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(struct address_space *mapping);
 
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index fd441ea..d9ebabe 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1160,19 +1160,22 @@ static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 	trace_bdi_dirty_ratelimit(wb->bdi, dirty_rate, task_ratelimit);
 }
 
-void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
-			   unsigned long thresh,
-			   unsigned long bg_thresh,
-			   unsigned long dirty,
-			   unsigned long wb_thresh,
-			   unsigned long wb_dirty,
-			   unsigned long start_time)
+static void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
+				  unsigned long thresh,
+				  unsigned long bg_thresh,
+				  unsigned long dirty,
+				  unsigned long wb_thresh,
+				  unsigned long wb_dirty,
+				  unsigned long start_time,
+				  bool update_ratelimit)
 {
 	unsigned long now = jiffies;
 	unsigned long elapsed = now - wb->bw_time_stamp;
 	unsigned long dirtied;
 	unsigned long written;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&wb->list_lock);
+
 	/*
 	 * rate-limit, only update once every 200ms.
 	 */
@@ -1189,7 +1192,7 @@ void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 	if (elapsed > HZ && time_before(wb->bw_time_stamp, start_time))
 		goto snapshot;
 
-	if (thresh) {
+	if (update_ratelimit) {
 		global_update_bandwidth(thresh, dirty, now);
 		wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(wb, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
 					  wb_thresh, wb_dirty,
@@ -1203,20 +1206,9 @@ snapshot:
 	wb->bw_time_stamp = now;
 }
 
-static void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
-				unsigned long thresh,
-				unsigned long bg_thresh,
-				unsigned long dirty,
-				unsigned long wb_thresh,
-				unsigned long wb_dirty,
-				unsigned long start_time)
+void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long start_time)
 {
-	if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(wb->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
-		return;
-	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
-	__wb_update_bandwidth(wb, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
-			      wb_thresh, wb_dirty, start_time);
-	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+	__wb_update_bandwidth(wb, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, start_time, false);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1467,8 +1459,15 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
 		if (dirty_exceeded && !wb->dirty_exceeded)
 			wb->dirty_exceeded = 1;
 
-		wb_update_bandwidth(wb, dirty_thresh, background_thresh,
-				    nr_dirty, wb_thresh, wb_dirty, start_time);
+		if (time_is_before_jiffies(wb->bw_time_stamp +
+					   BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)) {
+			spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
+			__wb_update_bandwidth(wb, dirty_thresh,
+					      background_thresh, nr_dirty,
+					      wb_thresh, wb_dirty, start_time,
+					      true);
+			spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+		}
 
 		dirty_ratelimit = wb->dirty_ratelimit;
 		pos_ratio = wb_position_ratio(wb, dirty_thresh,
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-23  5:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-23  5:07 [PATCHSET 2/3 block/for-4.1/core] writeback: cgroup writeback backpressure propagation Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 01/18] memcg: make mem_cgroup_read_{stat|event}() iterate possible cpus instead of online Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:39   ` [PATCH 1.5/18] writeback: clean up wb_dirty_limit() Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:39     ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:39     ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:39     ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-03-23  5:07   ` [PATCH 02/18] writeback: reorganize [__]wb_update_bandwidth() Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 03/18] writeback: implement wb_domain Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 04/18] writeback: move global_dirty_limit into wb_domain Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 05/18] writeback: consolidate dirty throttle parameters into dirty_throttle_control Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 06/18] writeback: add dirty_throttle_control->wb_bg_thresh Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 07/18] writeback: make __wb_dirty_limit() take dirty_throttle_control Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:42   ` [PATCH v2 07/18] writeback: make __wb_calc_thresh() " Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:42     ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:42     ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:42     ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 08/18] writeback: add dirty_throttle_control->pos_ratio Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 09/18] writeback: add dirty_throttle_control->wb_completions Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 10/18] writeback: add dirty_throttle_control->dom Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 11/18] writeback: make __wb_writeout_inc() and hard_dirty_limit() take wb_domaas a parameter Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 12/18] writeback: separate out domain_dirty_limits() Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 13/18] writeback: move over_bground_thresh() to mm/page-writeback.c Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 14/18] writeback: update wb_over_bg_thresh() to use wb_domain aware operations Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 15/18] writeback: implement memcg wb_domain Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 16/18] writeback: reset wb_domain->dirty_limit[_tstmp] when memcg domain size changes Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 17/18] writeback: implement memcg writeback domain based throttling Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07 ` [PATCH 18/18] mm: vmscan: remove memcg stalling on writeback pages during direct reclaim Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:07   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:27   ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-23  5:27     ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:26   ` [PATCH v2 18/18] mm: vmscan: disable memcg direct reclaim stalling if cgroup writeback support is in use Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:26     ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:26     ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-25 22:26     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1427087267-16592-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.