All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: <nm@ti.com>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c: Enable the mcp794xx alarm after programming time
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:55:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429574122-4284-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> (raw)

Alarm interrupt enable register is at offset 0x7, while the time
registers for the alarm follow that. When we program Alarm interrupt
enable prior to programming the time, it is possible that previous
time value could be close or match at the time of alarm enable
resulting in interrupt trigger which is unexpected (and does not match
the time we expect it to trigger).

To prevent this scenario from occurring, program the ALM0_EN bit only
after the alarm time is appropriately programmed.

Of course, I2C programming is non-atomic, so there are loopholes where
the interrupt wont trigger if the time requested is in the past at
the time of programming the ALM0_EN bit. However, we will not have
unexpected interrupts while the time is programmed after the interrupt
are enabled.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
index 4ffabb322a9a..59f9ecf323d5 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
@@ -742,17 +742,17 @@ static int mcp794xx_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
 	regs[6] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALMX_IF;
 	/* Set alarm match: second, minute, hour, day, date, month. */
 	regs[6] |= MCP794XX_MSK_ALMX_MATCH;
-
-	if (t->enabled)
-		regs[0] |= MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
-	else
-		regs[0] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
+	/* Disable interrupt. We will not enable until completely programed */
+	regs[0] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
 
 	ret = ds1307->write_block_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, 10, regs);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	return 0;
+	if (!t->enabled)
+		return 0;
+	regs[0] |= MCP7941X_BIT_ALM0_EN;
+	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, regs[0]);
 }
 
 static int mcp794xx_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
-- 
1.7.9.5


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: <nm@ti.com>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c: Enable the mcp794xx alarm after programming time
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:55:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429574122-4284-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> (raw)

Alarm interrupt enable register is at offset 0x7, while the time
registers for the alarm follow that. When we program Alarm interrupt
enable prior to programming the time, it is possible that previous
time value could be close or match at the time of alarm enable
resulting in interrupt trigger which is unexpected (and does not match
the time we expect it to trigger).

To prevent this scenario from occurring, program the ALM0_EN bit only
after the alarm time is appropriately programmed.

Of course, I2C programming is non-atomic, so there are loopholes where
the interrupt wont trigger if the time requested is in the past at
the time of programming the ALM0_EN bit. However, we will not have
unexpected interrupts while the time is programmed after the interrupt
are enabled.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
index 4ffabb322a9a..59f9ecf323d5 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
@@ -742,17 +742,17 @@ static int mcp794xx_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
 	regs[6] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALMX_IF;
 	/* Set alarm match: second, minute, hour, day, date, month. */
 	regs[6] |= MCP794XX_MSK_ALMX_MATCH;
-
-	if (t->enabled)
-		regs[0] |= MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
-	else
-		regs[0] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
+	/* Disable interrupt. We will not enable until completely programed */
+	regs[0] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
 
 	ret = ds1307->write_block_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, 10, regs);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	return 0;
+	if (!t->enabled)
+		return 0;
+	regs[0] |= MCP7941X_BIT_ALM0_EN;
+	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, regs[0]);
 }
 
 static int mcp794xx_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
-- 
1.7.9.5

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: nm@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c: Enable the mcp794xx alarm after programming time
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:55:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429574122-4284-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> (raw)

Alarm interrupt enable register is at offset 0x7, while the time
registers for the alarm follow that. When we program Alarm interrupt
enable prior to programming the time, it is possible that previous
time value could be close or match at the time of alarm enable
resulting in interrupt trigger which is unexpected (and does not match
the time we expect it to trigger).

To prevent this scenario from occurring, program the ALM0_EN bit only
after the alarm time is appropriately programmed.

Of course, I2C programming is non-atomic, so there are loopholes where
the interrupt wont trigger if the time requested is in the past at
the time of programming the ALM0_EN bit. However, we will not have
unexpected interrupts while the time is programmed after the interrupt
are enabled.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
index 4ffabb322a9a..59f9ecf323d5 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
@@ -742,17 +742,17 @@ static int mcp794xx_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
 	regs[6] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALMX_IF;
 	/* Set alarm match: second, minute, hour, day, date, month. */
 	regs[6] |= MCP794XX_MSK_ALMX_MATCH;
-
-	if (t->enabled)
-		regs[0] |= MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
-	else
-		regs[0] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
+	/* Disable interrupt. We will not enable until completely programed */
+	regs[0] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
 
 	ret = ds1307->write_block_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, 10, regs);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	return 0;
+	if (!t->enabled)
+		return 0;
+	regs[0] |= MCP7941X_BIT_ALM0_EN;
+	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, regs[0]);
 }
 
 static int mcp794xx_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
-- 
1.7.9.5

             reply	other threads:[~2015-04-20 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-20 23:55 Nishanth Menon [this message]
2015-04-20 23:55 ` [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c: Enable the mcp794xx alarm after programming time Nishanth Menon
2015-04-20 23:55 ` [rtc-linux] " Nishanth Menon
2015-04-21  0:24 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-21  0:24   ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-21  0:24   ` [rtc-linux] " Nishanth Menon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1429574122-4284-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.