From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bhelgaas@google.com Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: [PATCH V4 09/11] powerpc/eeh: handle VF PE properly Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 13:46:24 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1431668786-30371-10-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1431668786-30371-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Compared with Bus PE, VF PE just has one single pci function. This introduces the difference of error handling on a VF PE. For example in the hotplug case, EEH needs to remove and re-create the VF properly. In the case when PF's error_detected() disable SRIOV, this patch introduces a flag to mark the eeh_dev of a VF to avoid the slot_reset() and resume(). Since the FW is not ware of the VF, this patch handles the VF restore/reset in kernel directly. This patch is to handle the VF PE properly in these cases. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 1 + arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 3 +- 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h index 3d64cf3..d24382c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct eeh_dev { struct pci_controller *phb; /* Associated PHB */ struct pci_dn *pdn; /* Associated PCI device node */ struct pci_dev *pdev; /* Associated PCI device */ + int in_error; /* Error flag for eeh_dev */ struct pci_dev *physfn; /* Associated PF PORT */ struct pci_bus *bus; /* PCI bus for partial hotplug */ }; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c index 221e280..077c3d1 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c @@ -1226,6 +1226,7 @@ void eeh_remove_device(struct pci_dev *dev) * from the parent PE during the BAR resotre. */ edev->pdev = NULL; + edev->in_error = 0; dev->dev.archdata.edev = NULL; if (!(edev->pe->state & EEH_PE_KEEP)) eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c index 89eb4bc..292089e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static void *eeh_report_error(void *data, void *userdata) if (rc == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET) *res = rc; if (*res == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE) *res = rc; + edev->in_error = 1; eeh_pcid_put(dev); return NULL; } @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ static void *eeh_report_reset(void *data, void *userdata) if (!driver->err_handler || !driver->err_handler->slot_reset || - (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER)) { + (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER) || + (!edev->in_error)) { eeh_pcid_put(dev); return NULL; } @@ -339,14 +341,16 @@ static void *eeh_report_resume(void *data, void *userdata) if (!driver->err_handler || !driver->err_handler->resume || - (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER)) { + (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER) || + (!edev->in_error)) { edev->mode &= ~EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER; - eeh_pcid_put(dev); - return NULL; + goto out; } driver->err_handler->resume(dev); +out: + edev->in_error = 0; eeh_pcid_put(dev); return NULL; } @@ -386,12 +390,40 @@ static void *eeh_report_failure(void *data, void *userdata) return NULL; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV +static void *eeh_add_virt_device(void *data, void *userdata) +{ + struct pci_driver *driver; + struct eeh_dev *edev = (struct eeh_dev *)data; + struct pci_dev *dev = eeh_dev_to_pci_dev(edev); + struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev); + + if (!(edev->physfn)) { + pr_warn("%s: EEH dev %04x:%02x:%02x:%01x not for VF\n", + __func__, edev->phb->global_number, pdn->busno, + PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn)); + return NULL; + } + + driver = eeh_pcid_get(dev); + if (driver) { + eeh_pcid_put(dev); + if (driver->err_handler) + return NULL; + } + + pci_iov_virtfn_add(edev->physfn, pdn->vf_index, 0); + return NULL; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */ + static void *eeh_rmv_device(void *data, void *userdata) { struct pci_driver *driver; struct eeh_dev *edev = (struct eeh_dev *)data; struct pci_dev *dev = eeh_dev_to_pci_dev(edev); int *removed = (int *)userdata; + struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev); /* * Actually, we should remove the PCI bridges as well. @@ -416,7 +448,7 @@ static void *eeh_rmv_device(void *data, void *userdata) driver = eeh_pcid_get(dev); if (driver) { eeh_pcid_put(dev); - if (driver->err_handler) + if (removed && driver->err_handler) return NULL; } @@ -425,11 +457,18 @@ static void *eeh_rmv_device(void *data, void *userdata) pci_name(dev)); edev->bus = dev->bus; edev->mode |= EEH_DEV_DISCONNECTED; - (*removed)++; - - pci_lock_rescan_remove(); - pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev); - pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + if (removed) + (*removed)++; + + if (edev->physfn) { + pci_iov_virtfn_remove(edev->physfn, pdn->vf_index, 0); + edev->pdev = NULL; + pdn->pe_number = IODA_INVALID_PE; + } else { + pci_lock_rescan_remove(); + pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev); + pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + } return NULL; } @@ -548,6 +587,7 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus) struct pci_bus *frozen_bus = eeh_pe_bus_get(pe); struct timeval tstamp; int cnt, rc, removed = 0; + struct eeh_dev *edev; /* pcibios will clear the counter; save the value */ cnt = pe->freeze_count; @@ -561,12 +601,15 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus) */ eeh_pe_state_mark(pe, EEH_PE_KEEP); if (bus) { - pci_lock_rescan_remove(); - pcibios_remove_pci_devices(bus); - pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); - } else if (frozen_bus) { + if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) + eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device, NULL); + else { + pci_lock_rescan_remove(); + pcibios_remove_pci_devices(bus); + pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + } + } else if (frozen_bus) eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device, &removed); - } /* * Reset the pci controller. (Asserts RST#; resets config space). @@ -607,14 +650,26 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus) * PE. We should disconnect it so the binding can be * rebuilt when adding PCI devices. */ + edev = list_first_entry(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev, list); eeh_pe_traverse(pe, eeh_pe_detach_dev, NULL); - pcibios_add_pci_devices(bus); +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV + if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) + eeh_add_virt_device(edev, NULL); + else +#endif + pcibios_add_pci_devices(bus); } else if (frozen_bus && removed) { pr_info("EEH: Sleep 5s ahead of partial hotplug\n"); ssleep(5); + edev = list_first_entry(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev, list); eeh_pe_traverse(pe, eeh_pe_detach_dev, NULL); - pcibios_add_pci_devices(frozen_bus); +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV + if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) + eeh_add_virt_device(edev, NULL); + else +#endif + pcibios_add_pci_devices(frozen_bus); } eeh_pe_state_clear(pe, EEH_PE_KEEP); @@ -792,11 +847,15 @@ perm_error: * the their PCI config any more. */ if (frozen_bus) { - eeh_pe_dev_mode_mark(pe, EEH_DEV_REMOVED); - - pci_lock_rescan_remove(); - pcibios_remove_pci_devices(frozen_bus); - pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) { + eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device, NULL); + eeh_pe_dev_mode_mark(pe, EEH_DEV_REMOVED); + } else { + eeh_pe_dev_mode_mark(pe, EEH_DEV_REMOVED); + pci_lock_rescan_remove(); + pcibios_remove_pci_devices(frozen_bus); + pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + } } } diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c index 260a701..5cde950 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c @@ -914,7 +914,8 @@ struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe) if (pe->type & EEH_PE_PHB) { bus = pe->phb->bus; } else if (pe->type & EEH_PE_BUS || - pe->type & EEH_PE_DEVICE) { + pe->type & EEH_PE_DEVICE || + pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) { if (pe->bus) { bus = pe->bus; goto out; -- 1.7.9.5
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bhelgaas@google.com Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH V4 09/11] powerpc/eeh: handle VF PE properly Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 13:46:24 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1431668786-30371-10-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1431668786-30371-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Compared with Bus PE, VF PE just has one single pci function. This introduces the difference of error handling on a VF PE. For example in the hotplug case, EEH needs to remove and re-create the VF properly. In the case when PF's error_detected() disable SRIOV, this patch introduces a flag to mark the eeh_dev of a VF to avoid the slot_reset() and resume(). Since the FW is not ware of the VF, this patch handles the VF restore/reset in kernel directly. This patch is to handle the VF PE properly in these cases. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 1 + arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 3 +- 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h index 3d64cf3..d24382c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct eeh_dev { struct pci_controller *phb; /* Associated PHB */ struct pci_dn *pdn; /* Associated PCI device node */ struct pci_dev *pdev; /* Associated PCI device */ + int in_error; /* Error flag for eeh_dev */ struct pci_dev *physfn; /* Associated PF PORT */ struct pci_bus *bus; /* PCI bus for partial hotplug */ }; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c index 221e280..077c3d1 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c @@ -1226,6 +1226,7 @@ void eeh_remove_device(struct pci_dev *dev) * from the parent PE during the BAR resotre. */ edev->pdev = NULL; + edev->in_error = 0; dev->dev.archdata.edev = NULL; if (!(edev->pe->state & EEH_PE_KEEP)) eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(edev); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c index 89eb4bc..292089e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static void *eeh_report_error(void *data, void *userdata) if (rc == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET) *res = rc; if (*res == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE) *res = rc; + edev->in_error = 1; eeh_pcid_put(dev); return NULL; } @@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ static void *eeh_report_reset(void *data, void *userdata) if (!driver->err_handler || !driver->err_handler->slot_reset || - (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER)) { + (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER) || + (!edev->in_error)) { eeh_pcid_put(dev); return NULL; } @@ -339,14 +341,16 @@ static void *eeh_report_resume(void *data, void *userdata) if (!driver->err_handler || !driver->err_handler->resume || - (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER)) { + (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER) || + (!edev->in_error)) { edev->mode &= ~EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER; - eeh_pcid_put(dev); - return NULL; + goto out; } driver->err_handler->resume(dev); +out: + edev->in_error = 0; eeh_pcid_put(dev); return NULL; } @@ -386,12 +390,40 @@ static void *eeh_report_failure(void *data, void *userdata) return NULL; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV +static void *eeh_add_virt_device(void *data, void *userdata) +{ + struct pci_driver *driver; + struct eeh_dev *edev = (struct eeh_dev *)data; + struct pci_dev *dev = eeh_dev_to_pci_dev(edev); + struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev); + + if (!(edev->physfn)) { + pr_warn("%s: EEH dev %04x:%02x:%02x:%01x not for VF\n", + __func__, edev->phb->global_number, pdn->busno, + PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn)); + return NULL; + } + + driver = eeh_pcid_get(dev); + if (driver) { + eeh_pcid_put(dev); + if (driver->err_handler) + return NULL; + } + + pci_iov_virtfn_add(edev->physfn, pdn->vf_index, 0); + return NULL; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */ + static void *eeh_rmv_device(void *data, void *userdata) { struct pci_driver *driver; struct eeh_dev *edev = (struct eeh_dev *)data; struct pci_dev *dev = eeh_dev_to_pci_dev(edev); int *removed = (int *)userdata; + struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev); /* * Actually, we should remove the PCI bridges as well. @@ -416,7 +448,7 @@ static void *eeh_rmv_device(void *data, void *userdata) driver = eeh_pcid_get(dev); if (driver) { eeh_pcid_put(dev); - if (driver->err_handler) + if (removed && driver->err_handler) return NULL; } @@ -425,11 +457,18 @@ static void *eeh_rmv_device(void *data, void *userdata) pci_name(dev)); edev->bus = dev->bus; edev->mode |= EEH_DEV_DISCONNECTED; - (*removed)++; - - pci_lock_rescan_remove(); - pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev); - pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + if (removed) + (*removed)++; + + if (edev->physfn) { + pci_iov_virtfn_remove(edev->physfn, pdn->vf_index, 0); + edev->pdev = NULL; + pdn->pe_number = IODA_INVALID_PE; + } else { + pci_lock_rescan_remove(); + pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev); + pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + } return NULL; } @@ -548,6 +587,7 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus) struct pci_bus *frozen_bus = eeh_pe_bus_get(pe); struct timeval tstamp; int cnt, rc, removed = 0; + struct eeh_dev *edev; /* pcibios will clear the counter; save the value */ cnt = pe->freeze_count; @@ -561,12 +601,15 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus) */ eeh_pe_state_mark(pe, EEH_PE_KEEP); if (bus) { - pci_lock_rescan_remove(); - pcibios_remove_pci_devices(bus); - pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); - } else if (frozen_bus) { + if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) + eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device, NULL); + else { + pci_lock_rescan_remove(); + pcibios_remove_pci_devices(bus); + pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + } + } else if (frozen_bus) eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device, &removed); - } /* * Reset the pci controller. (Asserts RST#; resets config space). @@ -607,14 +650,26 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus) * PE. We should disconnect it so the binding can be * rebuilt when adding PCI devices. */ + edev = list_first_entry(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev, list); eeh_pe_traverse(pe, eeh_pe_detach_dev, NULL); - pcibios_add_pci_devices(bus); +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV + if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) + eeh_add_virt_device(edev, NULL); + else +#endif + pcibios_add_pci_devices(bus); } else if (frozen_bus && removed) { pr_info("EEH: Sleep 5s ahead of partial hotplug\n"); ssleep(5); + edev = list_first_entry(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev, list); eeh_pe_traverse(pe, eeh_pe_detach_dev, NULL); - pcibios_add_pci_devices(frozen_bus); +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV + if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) + eeh_add_virt_device(edev, NULL); + else +#endif + pcibios_add_pci_devices(frozen_bus); } eeh_pe_state_clear(pe, EEH_PE_KEEP); @@ -792,11 +847,15 @@ perm_error: * the their PCI config any more. */ if (frozen_bus) { - eeh_pe_dev_mode_mark(pe, EEH_DEV_REMOVED); - - pci_lock_rescan_remove(); - pcibios_remove_pci_devices(frozen_bus); - pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) { + eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device, NULL); + eeh_pe_dev_mode_mark(pe, EEH_DEV_REMOVED); + } else { + eeh_pe_dev_mode_mark(pe, EEH_DEV_REMOVED); + pci_lock_rescan_remove(); + pcibios_remove_pci_devices(frozen_bus); + pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + } } } diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c index 260a701..5cde950 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c @@ -914,7 +914,8 @@ struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe) if (pe->type & EEH_PE_PHB) { bus = pe->phb->bus; } else if (pe->type & EEH_PE_BUS || - pe->type & EEH_PE_DEVICE) { + pe->type & EEH_PE_DEVICE || + pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) { if (pe->bus) { bus = pe->bus; goto out; -- 1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 5:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-05-15 5:46 [PATCH V4 00/11] VF EEH on Power8 Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 01/11] pci/iov: rename and export virtfn_add/virtfn_remove Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:56 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 5:56 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 02/11] powerpc/pci_dn: cache vf_index in pci_dn Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:57 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 5:57 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 03/11] powerpc/pci: remove PCI devices in reverse order Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 04/11] powerpc/eeh: cache address range just for normal device Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 05/11] powerpc/powernv: create/release eeh_dev for VF Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 6:19 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 6:19 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 8:53 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 8:53 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 06/11] powerpc/eeh: create EEH_PE_VF for VF PE Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 6:26 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 6:26 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 07/11] powerpc/powernv: Support EEH reset for VFs Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 7:12 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 7:12 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 08/11] powerpc/powernv: Support PCI config restore " Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 7:27 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 7:27 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 9:18 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 9:18 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang [this message] 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 09/11] powerpc/eeh: handle VF PE properly Wei Yang 2015-05-15 7:31 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 7:31 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 10/11] powerpc/powernv: use "compound" as the child's list_head for compound PE Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang 2015-05-15 7:37 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 7:37 ` Gavin Shan 2015-05-15 5:46 ` [PATCH V4 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs Wei Yang 2015-05-15 5:46 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1431668786-30371-10-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --to=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.