All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Vaibhav Hiremath
	<vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang
	<haojian.zhuang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: core: append hardware lock with bus lock
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:02:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432819968-17515-2-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432819968-17515-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

To justify the need for hardware lock, lets take a real usecase scenario -

In case of Marvell SoC, PXA910 silicon, both AP and CP are present and
 these two ARM cores are sharing one pair of I2C pins.

In order to keep I2C transaction operated with atomic, hardware lock
(RIPC) is required.

This patch extends support for atomic operation by adding hardware lock.

History:
The attempt has been made to push this patch-sets upstream sometime back in
2011, but not sure what happened later. I am making another attempt, hopefully
will conclude it now.

Link to previous patch:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-i2c&m=130432846300735&w=2

Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
 include/linux/i2c.h    |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index 987c124..daea523 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -868,8 +868,11 @@ void i2c_lock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
 
 	if (parent)
 		i2c_lock_adapter(parent);
-	else
+	else {
 		rt_mutex_lock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+		if (adapter->hardware_lock)
+			adapter->hardware_lock(adapter);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_lock_adapter);
 
@@ -880,11 +883,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_lock_adapter);
 static int i2c_trylock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
 {
 	struct i2c_adapter *parent = i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(adapter);
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (parent)
 		return i2c_trylock_adapter(parent);
-	else
-		return rt_mutex_trylock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+	else {
+		ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+		if (ret && adapter->hardware_trylock) {
+			ret = adapter->hardware_trylock(adapter);
+			if (!ret)
+				i2c_unlock_adapter(adapter);
+		}
+		return ret;
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -897,8 +908,11 @@ void i2c_unlock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
 
 	if (parent)
 		i2c_unlock_adapter(parent);
-	else
+	else {
+		if (adapter->hardware_unlock)
+			adapter->hardware_unlock(adapter);
 		rt_mutex_unlock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_unlock_adapter);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
index e83a738..0758fb3 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
@@ -504,6 +504,11 @@ struct i2c_adapter {
 	/* data fields that are valid for all devices	*/
 	struct rt_mutex bus_lock;
 
+	/* if hardware lock feature provided */
+	void (*hardware_lock)(struct i2c_adapter *);
+	void (*hardware_unlock)(struct i2c_adapter *);
+	int (*hardware_trylock)(struct i2c_adapter *);
+
 	int timeout;			/* in jiffies */
 	int retries;
 	struct device dev;		/* the adapter device */
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (Vaibhav Hiremath)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: core: append hardware lock with bus lock
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:02:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432819968-17515-2-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432819968-17515-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>

To justify the need for hardware lock, lets take a real usecase scenario -

In case of Marvell SoC, PXA910 silicon, both AP and CP are present and
 these two ARM cores are sharing one pair of I2C pins.

In order to keep I2C transaction operated with atomic, hardware lock
(RIPC) is required.

This patch extends support for atomic operation by adding hardware lock.

History:
The attempt has been made to push this patch-sets upstream sometime back in
2011, but not sure what happened later. I am making another attempt, hopefully
will conclude it now.

Link to previous patch:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-i2c&m=130432846300735&w=2

Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
 include/linux/i2c.h    |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index 987c124..daea523 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -868,8 +868,11 @@ void i2c_lock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
 
 	if (parent)
 		i2c_lock_adapter(parent);
-	else
+	else {
 		rt_mutex_lock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+		if (adapter->hardware_lock)
+			adapter->hardware_lock(adapter);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_lock_adapter);
 
@@ -880,11 +883,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_lock_adapter);
 static int i2c_trylock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
 {
 	struct i2c_adapter *parent = i2c_parent_is_i2c_adapter(adapter);
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (parent)
 		return i2c_trylock_adapter(parent);
-	else
-		return rt_mutex_trylock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+	else {
+		ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+		if (ret && adapter->hardware_trylock) {
+			ret = adapter->hardware_trylock(adapter);
+			if (!ret)
+				i2c_unlock_adapter(adapter);
+		}
+		return ret;
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -897,8 +908,11 @@ void i2c_unlock_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
 
 	if (parent)
 		i2c_unlock_adapter(parent);
-	else
+	else {
+		if (adapter->hardware_unlock)
+			adapter->hardware_unlock(adapter);
 		rt_mutex_unlock(&adapter->bus_lock);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_unlock_adapter);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
index e83a738..0758fb3 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
@@ -504,6 +504,11 @@ struct i2c_adapter {
 	/* data fields that are valid for all devices	*/
 	struct rt_mutex bus_lock;
 
+	/* if hardware lock feature provided */
+	void (*hardware_lock)(struct i2c_adapter *);
+	void (*hardware_unlock)(struct i2c_adapter *);
+	int (*hardware_trylock)(struct i2c_adapter *);
+
 	int timeout;			/* in jiffies */
 	int retries;
 	struct device dev;		/* the adapter device */
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-28 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-28 13:32 [PATCH 0/3] i2c: core/pxa: Add support for hardware lock Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-05-28 13:32 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
     [not found] ` <1432819968-17515-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-28 13:32   ` Vaibhav Hiremath [this message]
2015-05-28 13:32     ` [PATCH 1/3] i2c: core: append hardware lock with bus lock Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-05-28 13:32   ` [PATCH 2/3] i2c: pxa: Add support for hardware lock Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-05-28 13:32     ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-05-28 13:32   ` [PATCH 3/3] i2c: pxa: Add pin ctrl support for CP core access Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-05-28 13:32     ` Vaibhav Hiremath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1432819968-17515-2-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org \
    --to=vaibhav.hiremath-qsej5fyqhm4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.