All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
To: heiko@sntech.de, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, olof@lixom.net,
	Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more readability and compatible
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:51:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442566271-10695-2-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442566271-10695-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com>

Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform,
There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip.

logs:
...
drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c:156:13: error: 'NO_IRQ' undeclared
/tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at  operand 1 --
`dsb`
...

The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64,
Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).

NO_IRQ definition is missing for ARM64, since NO_IRQ being -1 is a
legacy thing for ARM - all ARM drivers are supposed to be converted to
use <= 0 or == 0 to detect invalid IRQs, and _eventually_ once all users
are gone, NO_IRQ deleted. Modern drivers should _all_ be using !irq to
detect invalid IRQs, and not using NO_IRQ.

Meanwhile, I change a bit to make the code more readability for driver
when I check the code style.

Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
---

Changes in v1:
- As Russell, Thomas, Daniel comments, let's replace NO_IRQ by '!irq'.

 drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c
index bb2c2b0..e1af449 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c
@@ -17,16 +17,16 @@
 
 #define TIMER_NAME "rk_timer"
 
-#define TIMER_LOAD_COUNT0 0x00
-#define TIMER_LOAD_COUNT1 0x04
-#define TIMER_CONTROL_REG 0x10
-#define TIMER_INT_STATUS 0x18
+#define TIMER_LOAD_COUNT0	0x00
+#define TIMER_LOAD_COUNT1	0x04
+#define TIMER_CONTROL_REG	0x10
+#define TIMER_INT_STATUS	0x18
 
-#define TIMER_DISABLE 0x0
-#define TIMER_ENABLE 0x1
-#define TIMER_MODE_FREE_RUNNING (0 << 1)
-#define TIMER_MODE_USER_DEFINED_COUNT (1 << 1)
-#define TIMER_INT_UNMASK (1 << 2)
+#define TIMER_DISABLE			(0 << 0)
+#define TIMER_ENABLE			(1 << 0)
+#define TIMER_MODE_FREE_RUNNING		(0 << 1)
+#define TIMER_MODE_USER_DEFINED_COUNT	(1 << 1)
+#define TIMER_INT_UNMASK		(1 << 2)
 
 struct bc_timer {
 	struct clock_event_device ce;
@@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ static inline void __iomem *rk_base(struct clock_event_device *ce)
 static inline void rk_timer_disable(struct clock_event_device *ce)
 {
 	writel_relaxed(TIMER_DISABLE, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
-	dsb();
+	dsb(sy);
 }
 
 static inline void rk_timer_enable(struct clock_event_device *ce, u32 flags)
 {
 	writel_relaxed(TIMER_ENABLE | TIMER_INT_UNMASK | flags,
 		       rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
-	dsb();
+	dsb(sy);
 }
 
 static void rk_timer_update_counter(unsigned long cycles,
@@ -64,13 +64,13 @@ static void rk_timer_update_counter(unsigned long cycles,
 {
 	writel_relaxed(cycles, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_LOAD_COUNT0);
 	writel_relaxed(0, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_LOAD_COUNT1);
-	dsb();
+	dsb(sy);
 }
 
 static void rk_timer_interrupt_clear(struct clock_event_device *ce)
 {
 	writel_relaxed(1, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_INT_STATUS);
-	dsb();
+	dsb(sy);
 }
 
 static inline int rk_timer_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles,
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static void __init rk_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
 	bc_timer.freq = clk_get_rate(timer_clk);
 
 	irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
-	if (irq == NO_IRQ) {
+	if (!irq) {
 		pr_err("Failed to map interrupts for '%s'\n", TIMER_NAME);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -173,4 +173,5 @@ static void __init rk_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
 
 	clockevents_config_and_register(ce, bc_timer.freq, 1, UINT_MAX);
 }
+
 CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(rk_timer, "rockchip,rk3288-timer", rk_timer_init);
-- 
1.9.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: wxt@rock-chips.com (Caesar Wang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more readability and compatible
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:51:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442566271-10695-2-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442566271-10695-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com>

Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform,
There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip.

logs:
...
drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c:156:13: error: 'NO_IRQ' undeclared
/tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at  operand 1 --
`dsb`
...

The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64,
Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).

NO_IRQ definition is missing for ARM64, since NO_IRQ being -1 is a
legacy thing for ARM - all ARM drivers are supposed to be converted to
use <= 0 or == 0 to detect invalid IRQs, and _eventually_ once all users
are gone, NO_IRQ deleted. Modern drivers should _all_ be using !irq to
detect invalid IRQs, and not using NO_IRQ.

Meanwhile, I change a bit to make the code more readability for driver
when I check the code style.

Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
---

Changes in v1:
- As Russell, Thomas, Daniel comments, let's replace NO_IRQ by '!irq'.

 drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c
index bb2c2b0..e1af449 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c
@@ -17,16 +17,16 @@
 
 #define TIMER_NAME "rk_timer"
 
-#define TIMER_LOAD_COUNT0 0x00
-#define TIMER_LOAD_COUNT1 0x04
-#define TIMER_CONTROL_REG 0x10
-#define TIMER_INT_STATUS 0x18
+#define TIMER_LOAD_COUNT0	0x00
+#define TIMER_LOAD_COUNT1	0x04
+#define TIMER_CONTROL_REG	0x10
+#define TIMER_INT_STATUS	0x18
 
-#define TIMER_DISABLE 0x0
-#define TIMER_ENABLE 0x1
-#define TIMER_MODE_FREE_RUNNING (0 << 1)
-#define TIMER_MODE_USER_DEFINED_COUNT (1 << 1)
-#define TIMER_INT_UNMASK (1 << 2)
+#define TIMER_DISABLE			(0 << 0)
+#define TIMER_ENABLE			(1 << 0)
+#define TIMER_MODE_FREE_RUNNING		(0 << 1)
+#define TIMER_MODE_USER_DEFINED_COUNT	(1 << 1)
+#define TIMER_INT_UNMASK		(1 << 2)
 
 struct bc_timer {
 	struct clock_event_device ce;
@@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ static inline void __iomem *rk_base(struct clock_event_device *ce)
 static inline void rk_timer_disable(struct clock_event_device *ce)
 {
 	writel_relaxed(TIMER_DISABLE, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
-	dsb();
+	dsb(sy);
 }
 
 static inline void rk_timer_enable(struct clock_event_device *ce, u32 flags)
 {
 	writel_relaxed(TIMER_ENABLE | TIMER_INT_UNMASK | flags,
 		       rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
-	dsb();
+	dsb(sy);
 }
 
 static void rk_timer_update_counter(unsigned long cycles,
@@ -64,13 +64,13 @@ static void rk_timer_update_counter(unsigned long cycles,
 {
 	writel_relaxed(cycles, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_LOAD_COUNT0);
 	writel_relaxed(0, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_LOAD_COUNT1);
-	dsb();
+	dsb(sy);
 }
 
 static void rk_timer_interrupt_clear(struct clock_event_device *ce)
 {
 	writel_relaxed(1, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_INT_STATUS);
-	dsb();
+	dsb(sy);
 }
 
 static inline int rk_timer_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles,
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static void __init rk_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
 	bc_timer.freq = clk_get_rate(timer_clk);
 
 	irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
-	if (irq == NO_IRQ) {
+	if (!irq) {
 		pr_err("Failed to map interrupts for '%s'\n", TIMER_NAME);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -173,4 +173,5 @@ static void __init rk_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
 
 	clockevents_config_and_register(ce, bc_timer.freq, 1, UINT_MAX);
 }
+
 CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(rk_timer, "rockchip,rk3288-timer", rk_timer_init);
-- 
1.9.1

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-18  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-18  8:51 [PATCH v1 0/3] Support the timer on RK3368 SoC Caesar Wang
2015-09-18  8:51 ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-18  8:51 ` Caesar Wang [this message]
2015-09-18  8:51   ` [PATCH v1 1/3] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more readability and compatible Caesar Wang
2015-09-22 14:00   ` Heiko Stübner
2015-09-22 14:00     ` Heiko Stübner
2015-09-22 14:15     ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-22 14:15       ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-25  0:25       ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-25  0:25         ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-25  0:25         ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-09-25  2:18         ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-25  2:18           ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-25  2:18           ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-18  8:51 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] arm64: Enable the timer on Rockchip architecture Caesar Wang
2015-09-18  8:51   ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-18  8:51   ` Caesar Wang
2015-09-18  8:51 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add the needed timer for RK3368 SoC Caesar Wang
2015-09-18  8:51   ` Caesar Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1442566271-10695-2-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com \
    --to=wxt@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.