All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] sparc(64)/iommu: fixup iommu_tbl_range_alloc() types
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:17:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442855829-11245-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55FC49B8.3020100@arm.com>

With DMA_ERROR_CODE now being dma_addr_t in most architectures, it
turned out that iommu_tbl_range_alloc (defined in lib/iommu-common.c)
is actually using a wrong return type.
This was easily fixed in a previous patch, but now the types in the
callers do not match anymore.
This patch fixes the obvious mismatches to allow sane comparisons with
the error return value.
Compile-tested on sparc, sparc64, x86, ARM, arm64.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
Hi David,

as promised my first naive try on fixing the callers of
iommu_tbl_range_alloc() as well. This goes on top of the return type
fix I sent on Friday.
Please let me know if that makes sense or whether I am looking in the
totally wrong direction.

Cheers,
Andre.
 arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c     | 5 +++--
 arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c       | 5 +++--
 arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c | 7 ++++---
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c
index 5320689..7d04a87 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static inline iopte_t *alloc_npages(struct device *dev,
 				    struct iommu *iommu,
 				    unsigned long npages)
 {
-	unsigned long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 
 	entry = iommu_tbl_range_alloc(dev, &iommu->tbl, npages, NULL,
 				      (unsigned long)(-1), 0);
@@ -476,7 +476,8 @@ static int dma_4u_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
 				  IO_PAGE_SIZE) >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	base_shift = iommu->tbl.table_map_base >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	for_each_sg(sglist, s, nelems, i) {
-		unsigned long paddr, npages, entry, out_entry = 0, slen;
+		unsigned long paddr, npages, slen;
+		dma_addr_t entry, out_entry = 0;
 		iopte_t *base;
 
 		slen = s->length;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
index 1ae5eb1..41e79cb 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
@@ -1949,11 +1950,11 @@ static u64 make_cookie(u64 index, u64 pgsz_code, u64 page_offset)
 static struct ldc_mtable_entry *alloc_npages(struct ldc_iommu *iommu,
 					     unsigned long npages)
 {
-	long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 
 	entry = iommu_tbl_range_alloc(NULL, &iommu->iommu_map_table,
 				      npages, NULL, (unsigned long)-1, 0);
-	if (unlikely(entry < 0))
+	if (unlikely(entry == DMA_ERROR_CODE))
 		return NULL;
 
 	return iommu->page_table + entry;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
index d2fe57d..f86902f 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static void *dma_4v_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 	struct iommu *iommu;
 	struct page *page;
 	void *ret;
-	long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 	int nid;
 
 	size = IO_PAGE_ALIGN(size);
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static dma_addr_t dma_4v_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
 	unsigned long i, base_paddr;
 	u32 bus_addr, ret;
 	unsigned long prot;
-	long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 
 	iommu = dev->archdata.iommu;
 
@@ -361,7 +361,8 @@ static int dma_4v_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
 				  IO_PAGE_SIZE) >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	base_shift = iommu->tbl.table_map_base >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	for_each_sg(sglist, s, nelems, i) {
-		unsigned long paddr, npages, entry, out_entry = 0, slen;
+		unsigned long paddr, npages, slen;
+		dma_addr_t entry, out_entry = 0;
 
 		slen = s->length;
 		/* Sanity check */
-- 
2.5.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] sparc(64)/iommu: fixup iommu_tbl_range_alloc() types
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:17:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442855829-11245-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55FC49B8.3020100@arm.com>

With DMA_ERROR_CODE now being dma_addr_t in most architectures, it
turned out that iommu_tbl_range_alloc (defined in lib/iommu-common.c)
is actually using a wrong return type.
This was easily fixed in a previous patch, but now the types in the
callers do not match anymore.
This patch fixes the obvious mismatches to allow sane comparisons with
the error return value.
Compile-tested on sparc, sparc64, x86, ARM, arm64.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
Hi David,

as promised my first naive try on fixing the callers of
iommu_tbl_range_alloc() as well. This goes on top of the return type
fix I sent on Friday.
Please let me know if that makes sense or whether I am looking in the
totally wrong direction.

Cheers,
Andre.
 arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c     | 5 +++--
 arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c       | 5 +++--
 arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c | 7 ++++---
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c
index 5320689..7d04a87 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static inline iopte_t *alloc_npages(struct device *dev,
 				    struct iommu *iommu,
 				    unsigned long npages)
 {
-	unsigned long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 
 	entry = iommu_tbl_range_alloc(dev, &iommu->tbl, npages, NULL,
 				      (unsigned long)(-1), 0);
@@ -476,7 +476,8 @@ static int dma_4u_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
 				  IO_PAGE_SIZE) >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	base_shift = iommu->tbl.table_map_base >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	for_each_sg(sglist, s, nelems, i) {
-		unsigned long paddr, npages, entry, out_entry = 0, slen;
+		unsigned long paddr, npages, slen;
+		dma_addr_t entry, out_entry = 0;
 		iopte_t *base;
 
 		slen = s->length;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
index 1ae5eb1..41e79cb 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
@@ -1949,11 +1950,11 @@ static u64 make_cookie(u64 index, u64 pgsz_code, u64 page_offset)
 static struct ldc_mtable_entry *alloc_npages(struct ldc_iommu *iommu,
 					     unsigned long npages)
 {
-	long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 
 	entry = iommu_tbl_range_alloc(NULL, &iommu->iommu_map_table,
 				      npages, NULL, (unsigned long)-1, 0);
-	if (unlikely(entry < 0))
+	if (unlikely(entry = DMA_ERROR_CODE))
 		return NULL;
 
 	return iommu->page_table + entry;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
index d2fe57d..f86902f 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static void *dma_4v_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 	struct iommu *iommu;
 	struct page *page;
 	void *ret;
-	long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 	int nid;
 
 	size = IO_PAGE_ALIGN(size);
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static dma_addr_t dma_4v_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
 	unsigned long i, base_paddr;
 	u32 bus_addr, ret;
 	unsigned long prot;
-	long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 
 	iommu = dev->archdata.iommu;
 
@@ -361,7 +361,8 @@ static int dma_4v_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
 				  IO_PAGE_SIZE) >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	base_shift = iommu->tbl.table_map_base >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	for_each_sg(sglist, s, nelems, i) {
-		unsigned long paddr, npages, entry, out_entry = 0, slen;
+		unsigned long paddr, npages, slen;
+		dma_addr_t entry, out_entry = 0;
 
 		slen = s->length;
 		/* Sanity check */
-- 
2.5.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: andre.przywara@arm.com (Andre Przywara)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] sparc(64)/iommu: fixup iommu_tbl_range_alloc() types
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:17:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442855829-11245-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55FC49B8.3020100@arm.com>

With DMA_ERROR_CODE now being dma_addr_t in most architectures, it
turned out that iommu_tbl_range_alloc (defined in lib/iommu-common.c)
is actually using a wrong return type.
This was easily fixed in a previous patch, but now the types in the
callers do not match anymore.
This patch fixes the obvious mismatches to allow sane comparisons with
the error return value.
Compile-tested on sparc, sparc64, x86, ARM, arm64.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
Hi David,

as promised my first naive try on fixing the callers of
iommu_tbl_range_alloc() as well. This goes on top of the return type
fix I sent on Friday.
Please let me know if that makes sense or whether I am looking in the
totally wrong direction.

Cheers,
Andre.
 arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c     | 5 +++--
 arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c       | 5 +++--
 arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c | 7 ++++---
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c
index 5320689..7d04a87 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/iommu.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static inline iopte_t *alloc_npages(struct device *dev,
 				    struct iommu *iommu,
 				    unsigned long npages)
 {
-	unsigned long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 
 	entry = iommu_tbl_range_alloc(dev, &iommu->tbl, npages, NULL,
 				      (unsigned long)(-1), 0);
@@ -476,7 +476,8 @@ static int dma_4u_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
 				  IO_PAGE_SIZE) >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	base_shift = iommu->tbl.table_map_base >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	for_each_sg(sglist, s, nelems, i) {
-		unsigned long paddr, npages, entry, out_entry = 0, slen;
+		unsigned long paddr, npages, slen;
+		dma_addr_t entry, out_entry = 0;
 		iopte_t *base;
 
 		slen = s->length;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
index 1ae5eb1..41e79cb 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
@@ -1949,11 +1950,11 @@ static u64 make_cookie(u64 index, u64 pgsz_code, u64 page_offset)
 static struct ldc_mtable_entry *alloc_npages(struct ldc_iommu *iommu,
 					     unsigned long npages)
 {
-	long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 
 	entry = iommu_tbl_range_alloc(NULL, &iommu->iommu_map_table,
 				      npages, NULL, (unsigned long)-1, 0);
-	if (unlikely(entry < 0))
+	if (unlikely(entry == DMA_ERROR_CODE))
 		return NULL;
 
 	return iommu->page_table + entry;
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
index d2fe57d..f86902f 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static void *dma_4v_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 	struct iommu *iommu;
 	struct page *page;
 	void *ret;
-	long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 	int nid;
 
 	size = IO_PAGE_ALIGN(size);
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static dma_addr_t dma_4v_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
 	unsigned long i, base_paddr;
 	u32 bus_addr, ret;
 	unsigned long prot;
-	long entry;
+	dma_addr_t entry;
 
 	iommu = dev->archdata.iommu;
 
@@ -361,7 +361,8 @@ static int dma_4v_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sglist,
 				  IO_PAGE_SIZE) >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	base_shift = iommu->tbl.table_map_base >> IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	for_each_sg(sglist, s, nelems, i) {
-		unsigned long paddr, npages, entry, out_entry = 0, slen;
+		unsigned long paddr, npages, slen;
+		dma_addr_t entry, out_entry = 0;
 
 		slen = s->length;
 		/* Sanity check */
-- 
2.5.1

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-21 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-17  8:40 [PATCH] iommu-common: only compile lib/iommu_common.c for Sparc64 Andre Przywara
2015-09-17  8:40 ` Andre Przywara
2015-09-17  8:40 ` Andre Przywara
2015-09-17 18:38 ` David Miller
2015-09-17 18:38   ` David Miller
2015-09-17 18:38   ` David Miller
2015-09-18  9:03   ` Andre Przywara
2015-09-18  9:03     ` Andre Przywara
2015-09-18  9:03     ` Andre Przywara
2015-09-18  9:09     ` [PATCH] iommu-common: fix return type of iommu_tbl_range_alloc() Andre Przywara
2015-09-18  9:09       ` Andre Przywara
2015-09-18  9:09       ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-21 19:12       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-21 19:12         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-21 19:12         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-21 19:12         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-21 19:12         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-21 19:56         ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-10-21 19:56           ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-10-21 19:56           ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-10-21 19:56           ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-09-18 17:09     ` [PATCH] iommu-common: only compile lib/iommu_common.c for Sparc64 David Miller
2015-09-18 17:09       ` David Miller
2015-09-18 17:09       ` David Miller
2015-09-18 17:28       ` Andre Przywara
2015-09-18 17:28         ` Andre Przywara
2015-09-18 17:28         ` Andre Przywara
2015-09-21 17:17         ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2015-09-21 17:17           ` [PATCH] sparc(64)/iommu: fixup iommu_tbl_range_alloc() types Andre Przywara
2015-09-21 17:17           ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-05  9:54           ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-05  9:54             ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-05  9:54             ` Andre Przywara
2015-11-04 16:38             ` David Miller
2015-11-04 16:38               ` David Miller
2015-11-04 16:38               ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1442855829-11245-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.