All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yu.dai@intel.com
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC wq_reserve_space to alloc_request_extras
Date: Wed,  9 Dec 2015 10:50:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449687054-16903-1-git-send-email-yu.dai@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449623090-1461-1-git-send-email-yu.dai@intel.com>

From: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>

Split GuC work queue space reserve from submission and move it to
ring_alloc_request_extras. The reason is that failure in later
i915_add_request() won't be handled. In the case timeout happens,
driver can return early in order to handle the error.

v1: Move wq_reserve_space to ring_reserve_space
v2: Move wq_reserve_space to alloc_request_extras (Chris Wilson)

Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 21 +++++++++------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h           |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c           |  6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index 226e9c0..f7bd038 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -472,25 +472,21 @@ static void guc_fini_ctx_desc(struct intel_guc *guc,
 			     sizeof(desc) * client->ctx_index);
 }
 
-/* Get valid workqueue item and return it back to offset */
-static int guc_get_workqueue_space(struct i915_guc_client *gc, u32 *offset)
+int i915_guc_wq_reserve_space(struct i915_guc_client *gc)
 {
 	struct guc_process_desc *desc;
 	void *base;
 	u32 size = sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);
 	int ret = -ETIMEDOUT, timeout_counter = 200;
 
+	if (!gc)
+		return 0;
+
 	base = kmap_atomic(i915_gem_object_get_page(gc->client_obj, 0));
 	desc = base + gc->proc_desc_offset;
 
 	while (timeout_counter-- > 0) {
 		if (CIRC_SPACE(gc->wq_tail, desc->head, gc->wq_size) >= size) {
-			*offset = gc->wq_tail;
-
-			/* advance the tail for next workqueue item */
-			gc->wq_tail += size;
-			gc->wq_tail &= gc->wq_size - 1;
-
 			/* this will break the loop */
 			timeout_counter = 0;
 			ret = 0;
@@ -512,11 +508,12 @@ static int guc_add_workqueue_item(struct i915_guc_client *gc,
 	struct guc_wq_item *wqi;
 	void *base;
 	u32 tail, wq_len, wq_off = 0;
-	int ret;
 
-	ret = guc_get_workqueue_space(gc, &wq_off);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	wq_off = gc->wq_tail;
+
+	/* advance the tail for next workqueue item */
+	gc->wq_tail += sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);
+	gc->wq_tail &= gc->wq_size - 1;
 
 	/* For now workqueue item is 4 DWs; workqueue buffer is 2 pages. So we
 	 * should not have the case where structure wqi is across page, neither
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
index 0e048bf..59c8e21 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
@@ -123,5 +123,6 @@ int i915_guc_submit(struct i915_guc_client *client,
 		    struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
 void i915_guc_submission_disable(struct drm_device *dev);
 void i915_guc_submission_fini(struct drm_device *dev);
+int i915_guc_wq_reserve_space(struct i915_guc_client *client);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index f96fb51..7d53d27 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -667,6 +667,12 @@ int intel_logical_ring_alloc_request_extras(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request
 			return ret;
 	}
 
+	/* Reserve GuC WQ space here (one request needs one WQ item) because
+	 * the later i915_add_request() call can't fail. */
+	ret = i915_guc_wq_reserve_space(request->i915->guc.execbuf_client);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.5.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-09 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-09  1:04 [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC wq_reserve_space to ring_reserve_space yu.dai
2015-12-09  9:05 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-09 17:08   ` Yu Dai
2015-12-09 18:50 ` yu.dai [this message]
2015-12-10 17:14   ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC wq_reserve_space to alloc_request_extras Dave Gordon
2015-12-11  0:22     ` Yu Dai
2015-12-11  1:17 ` [PATCH v3] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC wq_check_space " yu.dai
2015-12-15 15:45   ` Dave Gordon
2015-12-16 19:45 ` [PATCH v4] " yu.dai
2015-12-23 15:39   ` Dave Gordon
2016-01-05 10:07     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1449687054-16903-1-git-send-email-yu.dai@intel.com \
    --to=yu.dai@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.