All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:35:23 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453941324-15742-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453941324-15742-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like
multi_v7 for ARMv7).

Instead build clock drivers only for respective SoC's architecture.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

---

Changes since v3:
1. Rebase on next-20160127.

Changes since v2:
1. Follow Arnd's advice making EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK user-visible when
   COMPILE_TEST is enabled.
2. Dropped accumulated tags because the logic is now different.

Changes since v1:
1. Use one Kconfig symbol for clocks of all ARM64 SoCs (after
   discussion): EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK.
2. Minor cleanups after Tomasz's comments.
3. Added tags: Chanwoo's, Sylwester's, Alim's and Tomasz's (the tags
   were given for v1 but assuming that change from 1. is not major
   enough to require re-tagging).
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig  | 5 +++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
index dd6093a33f84..5fd982d9f4d9 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
@@ -23,3 +23,8 @@ config S3C2443_COMMON_CLK
 	bool "Samsung S3C2443 clock controller support" if COMPILE_TEST
 	select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
 
+# ARM64 SoCs (e.g. Exynos5433, Exynos7):
+config EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK
+	bool "Samsung Exynos ARMv8-family clock controller support" if COMPILE_TEST
+	default ARM64 && COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
+	depends on (ARM64 && COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG) || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
index 5f6833ea355d..fc367d4b2902 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)	+= clk-exynos5250.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260)	+= clk-exynos5260.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410)	+= clk-exynos5410.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420)	+= clk-exynos5420.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= clk-exynos5433.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk-exynos5433.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440)	+= clk-exynos5440.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= clk-exynos-audss.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= clk-exynos-clkout.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7)	+= clk-exynos7.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk-exynos7.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2410_COMMON_CLK)+= clk-s3c2410.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2410_COMMON_DCLK)+= clk-s3c2410-dclk.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2412_COMMON_CLK)+= clk-s3c2412.o
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:35:23 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453941324-15742-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453941324-15742-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like
multi_v7 for ARMv7).

Instead build clock drivers only for respective SoC's architecture.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

---

Changes since v3:
1. Rebase on next-20160127.

Changes since v2:
1. Follow Arnd's advice making EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK user-visible when
   COMPILE_TEST is enabled.
2. Dropped accumulated tags because the logic is now different.

Changes since v1:
1. Use one Kconfig symbol for clocks of all ARM64 SoCs (after
   discussion): EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK.
2. Minor cleanups after Tomasz's comments.
3. Added tags: Chanwoo's, Sylwester's, Alim's and Tomasz's (the tags
   were given for v1 but assuming that change from 1. is not major
   enough to require re-tagging).
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig  | 5 +++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
index dd6093a33f84..5fd982d9f4d9 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
@@ -23,3 +23,8 @@ config S3C2443_COMMON_CLK
 	bool "Samsung S3C2443 clock controller support" if COMPILE_TEST
 	select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
 
+# ARM64 SoCs (e.g. Exynos5433, Exynos7):
+config EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK
+	bool "Samsung Exynos ARMv8-family clock controller support" if COMPILE_TEST
+	default ARM64 && COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
+	depends on (ARM64 && COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG) || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
index 5f6833ea355d..fc367d4b2902 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)	+= clk-exynos5250.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260)	+= clk-exynos5260.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410)	+= clk-exynos5410.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420)	+= clk-exynos5420.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= clk-exynos5433.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk-exynos5433.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440)	+= clk-exynos5440.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= clk-exynos-audss.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= clk-exynos-clkout.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7)	+= clk-exynos7.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk-exynos7.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2410_COMMON_CLK)+= clk-s3c2410.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2410_COMMON_DCLK)+= clk-s3c2410-dclk.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2412_COMMON_CLK)+= clk-s3c2412.o
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-28  0:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-28  0:35 [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64/clk: EXYNOS: Consolidate Exynos7 symbol Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-28  0:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-28  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] clk: samsung: Enable COMPILE_TEST for Samsung clocks Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-28  0:35   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-28  0:35   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-28 19:12   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-01-28 19:12     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-01-29 20:43   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-29 20:43     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-28  0:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-01-28  0:35   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-28  1:23   ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-01-28  1:23     ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-01-28 19:15   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-01-28 19:15     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-01-29 20:43   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-29 20:43     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-28  0:35 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: EXYNOS: Consolidate ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol into ARCH_EXYNOS Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-28  0:35   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-28 19:16   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-01-28 19:16     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-01-29  1:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] arm64/clk: EXYNOS: Consolidate Exynos7 symbol Andi Shyti
2016-01-29  1:13   ` Andi Shyti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1453941324-15742-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.