From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:36:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454942223-2781480-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
clang does not support nested functions inside of an array definition:
lib/test_static_keys.c:105:16: error: function definition is not allowed here
.test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
lib/test_static_keys.c:50:20: note: expanded from macro 'test_key_func'
({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
That code appears to have been a little too clever, so this
simplifies it a bit by defining functions outside of the array.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
lib/test_static_keys.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_static_keys.c b/lib/test_static_keys.c
index c61b299e367f..915d75df2086 100644
--- a/lib/test_static_keys.c
+++ b/lib/test_static_keys.c
@@ -46,8 +46,11 @@ struct test_key {
bool (*test_key)(void);
};
-#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
- ({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
+#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
+static bool key ## _ ## branch(void) \
+{ \
+ return branch(&key); \
+}
static void invert_key(struct static_key *key)
{
@@ -92,6 +95,25 @@ static int verify_keys(struct test_key *keys, int size, bool invert)
return 0;
}
+test_key_func(old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+
static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -102,95 +124,95 @@ static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* internal keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
/* external keys - old keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* external keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
};
--
2.7.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:36:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454942223-2781480-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
clang does not support nested functions inside of an array definition:
lib/test_static_keys.c:105:16: error: function definition is not allowed here
.test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
lib/test_static_keys.c:50:20: note: expanded from macro 'test_key_func'
({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
That code appears to have been a little too clever, so this
simplifies it a bit by defining functions outside of the array.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
lib/test_static_keys.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_static_keys.c b/lib/test_static_keys.c
index c61b299e367f..915d75df2086 100644
--- a/lib/test_static_keys.c
+++ b/lib/test_static_keys.c
@@ -46,8 +46,11 @@ struct test_key {
bool (*test_key)(void);
};
-#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
- ({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
+#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
+static bool key ## _ ## branch(void) \
+{ \
+ return branch(&key); \
+}
static void invert_key(struct static_key *key)
{
@@ -92,6 +95,25 @@ static int verify_keys(struct test_key *keys, int size, bool invert)
return 0;
}
+test_key_func(old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+
static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -102,95 +124,95 @@ static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* internal keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
/* external keys - old keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* external keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
};
--
2.7.0
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-08 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 14:36 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-02-08 14:36 ` [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 19:09 ` Jason Baron
2016-02-08 19:09 ` Jason Baron
2016-02-09 12:19 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/static_keys: Avoid " tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454942223-2781480-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.