All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, yauhen.kharuzhy@zavadatar.com
Subject: [PATCH 04/13] btrfs: Allow barrier_all_devices to do per-chunk device check
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 22:01:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462888911-5227-6-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462888911-5227-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com>

From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

The last user of num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures is
barrier_all_devices(). But it's can be easily changed to new per-chunk
degradable check framework.

Now btrfs_device will have two extra members, representing send/wait
error, set at write_dev_flush() time. And then check it in a similar but
more accurate behavior than old code.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 13 +++++--------
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |  6 +++++-
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 4f91a049fbca..9ad3667f5e71 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3496,8 +3496,6 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
 {
 	struct list_head *head;
 	struct btrfs_device *dev;
-	int errors_send = 0;
-	int errors_wait = 0;
 	int ret;
 
 	/* send down all the barriers */
@@ -3506,7 +3504,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
 		if (dev->missing)
 			continue;
 		if (!dev->bdev) {
-			errors_send++;
+			dev->err_send = 1;
 			continue;
 		}
 		if (!dev->in_fs_metadata || !dev->writeable)
@@ -3514,7 +3512,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
 
 		ret = write_dev_flush(dev, 0);
 		if (ret)
-			errors_send++;
+			dev->err_send = 1;
 	}
 
 	/* wait for all the barriers */
@@ -3522,7 +3520,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
 		if (dev->missing)
 			continue;
 		if (!dev->bdev) {
-			errors_wait++;
+			dev->err_wait = 1;
 			continue;
 		}
 		if (!dev->in_fs_metadata || !dev->writeable)
@@ -3530,10 +3528,9 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
 
 		ret = write_dev_flush(dev, 1);
 		if (ret)
-			errors_wait++;
+			dev->err_wait = 1;
 	}
-	if (errors_send > info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures ||
-	    errors_wait > info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures)
+	if (btrfs_check_degradable(info, info->sb->s_flags) < 0)
 		return -EIO;
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index f5fa5f88263c..639ae20cc5e6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -7105,8 +7105,12 @@ int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, unsigned flags)
 			btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(
 					map->type);
 		for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
-			if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing)
+			if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing ||
+			    map->stripes[i].dev->err_wait ||
+			    map->stripes[i].dev->err_send)
 				missing++;
+			map->stripes[i].dev->err_wait = 0;
+			map->stripes[i].dev->err_send = 0;
 		}
 		if (missing > max_tolerated) {
 			ret = -EIO;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index ae9d552c93bf..101e5db2dd63 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ struct btrfs_device {
 	int can_discard;
 	int is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace;
 
+	/* for barrier_all_devices() check */
+	int err_send;
+	int err_wait;
+
 #ifdef __BTRFS_NEED_DEVICE_DATA_ORDERED
 	seqcount_t data_seqcount;
 #endif
-- 
2.7.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-10 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-10 14:01 [PATCH v6 00/13] Introduce device state 'failed', spare device and auto replace Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 01/13] btrfs: Introduce a new function to check if all chunks a OK for degraded mount Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: introduce helper functions to perform hot replace Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 02/13] btrfs: Do per-chunk check for mount time check Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 03/13] btrfs: Do per-chunk degraded check for remount Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 05/13] btrfs: Cleanup num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH] btrfs: introduce BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SPARE_DEV Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 07/13] btrfs: add check not to mount a spare device Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 08/13] btrfs: support btrfs dev scan for " Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 09/13] btrfs: provide framework to get and put a " Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: introduce helper functions to perform hot replace Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: introduce device dynamic state transition to offline or failed Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: check device for critical errors and mark failed Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:01 ` [PATCH 13/13] btrfs: check for failed device and hot replace Anand Jain
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-10 14:09 [PATCH v6 00/13] Introduce device state 'failed', spare device and auto replace Anand Jain
2016-05-10 14:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] btrfs: Allow barrier_all_devices to do per-chunk device check Anand Jain
2016-04-18 11:31 [PATCH v5 00/13] Introduce device state 'failed', spare device and auto replace Anand Jain
2016-04-18 11:31 ` [PATCH 04/13] btrfs: Allow barrier_all_devices to do per-chunk device check Anand Jain
2016-04-12 14:15 [PATCH v4 00/13] Introduce device state 'failed', spare device and auto replace Anand Jain
2016-04-12 14:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] btrfs: Allow barrier_all_devices to do per-chunk device check Anand Jain
2016-04-02  1:30 [PATCH 00/13 v3] Introduce device state 'failed', Hot spare and Auto replace Anand Jain
2016-04-02  1:30 ` [PATCH 04/13] btrfs: Allow barrier_all_devices to do per-chunk device check Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1462888911-5227-6-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yauhen.kharuzhy@zavadatar.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.