All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@rock-chips.com>
To: joro@8bytes.org, heiko@sntech.de, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	mark.yao@rock-chips.com, airlied@linux.ie, tfiga@google.com,
	xxm@rock-chips.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@rock-chips.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix allocation of bases array in driver probe
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:13:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466734413-7453-4-git-send-email-zhengsq@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466734413-7453-1-git-send-email-zhengsq@rock-chips.com>

In .probe(), devm_kzalloc() is called with size == 0 and works only
by luck, due to internal behavior of the allocator and the fact
that the proper allocation size is small. Let's use proper value for
calculating the size.

Fixes: cd6438c5f844 ("iommu/rockchip: Reconstruct to support multi slaves")

Signed-off-by: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
index 53fa0d9..8a5bac7 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
@@ -1034,6 +1034,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct rk_iommu *iommu;
 	struct resource *res;
+	int num_res = pdev->num_resources;
 	int i;
 
 	iommu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iommu), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1043,12 +1044,13 @@ static int rk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, iommu);
 	iommu->dev = dev;
 	iommu->num_mmu = 0;
-	iommu->bases = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iommu->bases) * iommu->num_mmu,
+
+	iommu->bases = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iommu->bases) * num_res,
 				    GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!iommu->bases)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < pdev->num_resources; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < num_res; i++) {
 		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, i);
 		if (!res)
 			continue;
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
To: joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org,
	mark.yao-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org,
	airlied-cv59FeDIM0c@public.gmane.org,
	tfiga-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	xxm-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org
Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
	Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix allocation of bases array in driver probe
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:13:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466734413-7453-4-git-send-email-zhengsq@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466734413-7453-1-git-send-email-zhengsq-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>

In .probe(), devm_kzalloc() is called with size == 0 and works only
by luck, due to internal behavior of the allocator and the fact
that the proper allocation size is small. Let's use proper value for
calculating the size.

Fixes: cd6438c5f844 ("iommu/rockchip: Reconstruct to support multi slaves")

Signed-off-by: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
index 53fa0d9..8a5bac7 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
@@ -1034,6 +1034,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct rk_iommu *iommu;
 	struct resource *res;
+	int num_res = pdev->num_resources;
 	int i;
 
 	iommu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iommu), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1043,12 +1044,13 @@ static int rk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, iommu);
 	iommu->dev = dev;
 	iommu->num_mmu = 0;
-	iommu->bases = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iommu->bases) * iommu->num_mmu,
+
+	iommu->bases = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iommu->bases) * num_res,
 				    GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!iommu->bases)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < pdev->num_resources; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < num_res; i++) {
 		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, i);
 		if (!res)
 			continue;
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: zhengsq@rock-chips.com (Shunqian Zheng)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix allocation of bases array in driver probe
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:13:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466734413-7453-4-git-send-email-zhengsq@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466734413-7453-1-git-send-email-zhengsq@rock-chips.com>

In .probe(), devm_kzalloc() is called with size == 0 and works only
by luck, due to internal behavior of the allocator and the fact
that the proper allocation size is small. Let's use proper value for
calculating the size.

Fixes: cd6438c5f844 ("iommu/rockchip: Reconstruct to support multi slaves")

Signed-off-by: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
index 53fa0d9..8a5bac7 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
@@ -1034,6 +1034,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct rk_iommu *iommu;
 	struct resource *res;
+	int num_res = pdev->num_resources;
 	int i;
 
 	iommu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iommu), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1043,12 +1044,13 @@ static int rk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, iommu);
 	iommu->dev = dev;
 	iommu->num_mmu = 0;
-	iommu->bases = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iommu->bases) * iommu->num_mmu,
+
+	iommu->bases = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iommu->bases) * num_res,
 				    GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!iommu->bases)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < pdev->num_resources; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < num_res; i++) {
 		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, i);
 		if (!res)
 			continue;
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-24  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-24  2:13 iommu/rockchip: Fix bugs and enable on ARM64 Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13 ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13 ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix devm_{request,free}_irq parameter Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] iommu/rockchip: Add map_sg callback for rk_iommu_ops Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13 ` Shunqian Zheng [this message]
2016-06-24  2:13   ` [PATCH v5 3/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix allocation of bases array in driver probe Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] iommu/rockchip: Use DMA API to manage coherency Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] iommu/rockchip: Prepare to support generic DMA mapping Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] drm/rockchip: Do not use DMA mapping API if attached to IOMMU domain Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-07-08  0:54   ` Mark yao
2016-07-08  0:54     ` Mark yao
2016-07-08  0:54     ` Mark yao
2016-06-24  2:13 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] drm/rockchip: Use common IOMMU API to attach devices Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-07-08  0:54   ` Mark yao
2016-07-08  0:54     ` Mark yao
2016-07-08  0:54     ` Mark yao
2016-06-24  2:13 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] iommu/rockchip: Enable Rockchip IOMMU on ARM64 Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-06-24  2:13   ` Shunqian Zheng
2016-11-29  0:42   ` Brian Norris
2016-11-29  0:42     ` Brian Norris
2016-11-29  0:42     ` Brian Norris
2016-11-29  9:22     ` Heiko Stübner
2016-11-29  9:22       ` Heiko Stübner
2016-11-29  9:22       ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-27 12:57 ` iommu/rockchip: Fix bugs and enable " Joerg Roedel
2016-06-27 12:57   ` Joerg Roedel
2016-06-27 12:57   ` Joerg Roedel
2016-07-08  1:01   ` Mark yao
2016-07-08  1:01     ` Mark yao
2016-07-15 15:32     ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-15 15:32       ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-15 15:32       ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-15 16:16       ` Joerg Roedel
2016-07-15 16:16         ` Joerg Roedel
2017-03-08  5:50         ` Caesar Wang
2017-03-08  5:50           ` Caesar Wang
2017-03-08  5:50           ` Caesar Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466734413-7453-4-git-send-email-zhengsq@rock-chips.com \
    --to=zhengsq@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.yao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=tfiga@google.com \
    --cc=xxm@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.