From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drm: Paper over locking inversion after registration rework
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:15:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470305714-10674-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
around this. This should address the below lockdep splat:
======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
4.7.0-rc5+ #524 Tainted: G O
-------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u8:0/6 is trying to acquire lock:
(&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
but task is already holding lock:
((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ac195>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}:
[<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
[<ffffffff819a55b4>] down_write+0x44/0x80
[<ffffffff810abf91>] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x21/0xb0
[<ffffffff814c7448>] fb_register_client+0x18/0x20
[<ffffffff814c6c86>] backlight_device_register+0x136/0x260
[<ffffffffa0127eb2>] intel_backlight_device_register+0xa2/0x160 [i915]
[<ffffffffa00f46be>] intel_connector_register+0xe/0x10 [i915]
[<ffffffffa0112bfb>] intel_dp_connector_register+0x1b/0x80 [i915]
[<ffffffff8159dfea>] drm_connector_register+0x4a/0x80
[<ffffffff8159fe44>] drm_connector_register_all+0x64/0xf0
[<ffffffff815a2a64>] drm_modeset_register_all+0x174/0x1c0
[<ffffffff81599b72>] drm_dev_register+0xc2/0xd0
[<ffffffffa00621d7>] i915_driver_load+0x1547/0x2200 [i915]
[<ffffffffa006d80f>] i915_pci_probe+0x4f/0x70 [i915]
[<ffffffff814a2135>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
[<ffffffff814a349b>] pci_device_probe+0xdb/0x130
[<ffffffff815c07e3>] driver_probe_device+0x223/0x440
[<ffffffff815c0ad5>] __driver_attach+0xd5/0x100
[<ffffffff815be386>] bus_for_each_dev+0x66/0xa0
[<ffffffff815c002e>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff815bf9be>] bus_add_driver+0x1ee/0x280
[<ffffffff815c1810>] driver_register+0x60/0xe0
[<ffffffff814a1a10>] __pci_register_driver+0x60/0x70
[<ffffffffa01a905b>] i915_init+0x5b/0x62 [i915]
[<ffffffff8100042d>] do_one_initcall+0x3d/0x150
[<ffffffff811a935b>] do_init_module+0x5f/0x1d9
[<ffffffff81124416>] load_module+0x20e6/0x27e0
[<ffffffff81124d63>] SYSC_finit_module+0xc3/0xf0
[<ffffffff81124dae>] SyS_finit_module+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff819a83a9>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac
-> #0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}:
[<ffffffff810df0ac>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1260
[<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
[<ffffffff819a3097>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0
[<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
[<ffffffff8158f79b>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2b/0x80
[<ffffffff8158f81d>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50
[<ffffffffa0105f7a>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x60 [i915]
[<ffffffff814c13c6>] fbcon_init+0x586/0x610
[<ffffffff8154d16a>] visual_init+0xca/0x130
[<ffffffff8154e611>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1c1/0x3a0
[<ffffffff8154eaf6>] do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180
[<ffffffff814bd3a7>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x57/0xb0
[<ffffffff814c1e48>] fbcon_event_notify+0x658/0x750
[<ffffffff810abcae>] notifier_call_chain+0x3e/0xb0
[<ffffffff810ac1ad>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[<ffffffff810ac1e6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff814c748b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20
[<ffffffff814c86b1>] register_framebuffer+0x251/0x330
[<ffffffff8158fa9f>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x25f/0x3f0
[<ffffffffa0106b48>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915]
[<ffffffff810adfd8>] async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150
[<ffffffff810a3947>] process_one_work+0x1e7/0x750
[<ffffffff810a3efb>] worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0
[<ffffffff810aad4f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
[<ffffffff819a85ef>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem);
lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem);
lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
6 locks held by kworker/u8:0/6:
#0: ("events_unbound"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810a38c9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x750
#1: ((&entry->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810a38c9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x750
#2: (registration_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c8487>] register_framebuffer+0x27/0x330
#3: (console_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c86ce>] register_framebuffer+0x26e/0x330
#4: (&fb_info->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c78dd>] lock_fb_info+0x1d/0x40
#5: ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ac195>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Tainted: G O 4.7.0-rc5+ #524
Hardware name: Intel Corp. Broxton P/NOTEBOOK, BIOS APLKRVPA.X64.0138.B33.1606250842 06/25/2016
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
0000000000000000 ffff8800758577f0 ffffffff814507a5 ffffffff828b9900
ffffffff828b9900 ffff880075857830 ffffffff810dc6fa ffff880075857880
ffff88007584d688 0000000000000005 0000000000000006 ffff88007584d6b0
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff814507a5>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92
[<ffffffff810dc6fa>] print_circular_bug+0x1aa/0x200
[<ffffffff810df0ac>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1260
[<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
[<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
[<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
[<ffffffff819a3097>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0
[<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
[<ffffffff810fa85f>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x7f/0x90
[<ffffffff81208218>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x248/0x2b0
[<ffffffff815afdc5>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x25/0x120
[<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
[<ffffffff8158f79b>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2b/0x80
[<ffffffff8158f81d>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50
[<ffffffffa0105f7a>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x60 [i915]
[<ffffffff814c13c6>] fbcon_init+0x586/0x610
[<ffffffff8154d16a>] visual_init+0xca/0x130
[<ffffffff8154e611>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1c1/0x3a0
[<ffffffff8154eaf6>] do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180
[<ffffffff814bd3a7>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x57/0xb0
[<ffffffff814c1e48>] fbcon_event_notify+0x658/0x750
[<ffffffff810abcae>] notifier_call_chain+0x3e/0xb0
[<ffffffff810ac1ad>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[<ffffffff810ac1e6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff814c748b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20
[<ffffffff814c86b1>] register_framebuffer+0x251/0x330
[<ffffffff815b7e8d>] ? vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set+0x5d/0x70
[<ffffffff8158fa9f>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x25f/0x3f0
[<ffffffffa0106b48>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915]
[<ffffffff810adfd8>] async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150
[<ffffffff810a3947>] process_one_work+0x1e7/0x750
[<ffffffff810a38c9>] ? process_one_work+0x169/0x750
[<ffffffff810a3efb>] worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0
[<ffffffff810a3eb0>] ? process_one_work+0x750/0x750
[<ffffffff810aad4f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
[<ffffffff819a85ef>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
[<ffffffff810aac60>] ? kthread_stop+0x2e0/0x2e0
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
index ef921fa09a84..d9104d8b3c6b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
@@ -401,16 +401,14 @@ int drm_connector_register_all(struct drm_device *dev)
struct drm_connector *connector;
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
-
- drm_for_each_connector(connector, dev) {
+ /* FIXME: taking the mode config mutex ends up in a clash with
+ * fbcon/backlight registration */
+ list_for_each_entry(connector, &dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
ret = drm_connector_register(connector);
if (ret)
goto err;
}
- mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
-
return 0;
err:
--
2.8.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-04 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 10:15 Daniel Vetter [this message]
2016-08-04 10:35 ` [PATCH] drm: Paper over locking inversion after registration rework Jani Nikula
2016-08-04 11:12 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-08-04 16:13 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2016-08-04 16:35 Daniel Vetter
2016-08-05 8:57 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-08-05 9:21 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470305714-10674-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.