All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com, lee.jones@linaro.org
Cc: loic.pallardy@st.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 16/19] remoteproc: core: Clean-up resource table sanity checks
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:50:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472676622-32533-17-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472676622-32533-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com>

As resource table has been verified after just loading,
the different sanity checks done when accessing resources
are no more needed.

Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 47 ++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index b43553f..462cf79 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(rproc_list);
 typedef int (*rproc_handle_resources_t)(struct rproc *rproc,
 				struct resource_table *table, int len);
 typedef int (*rproc_handle_resource_t)(struct rproc *rproc,
-				 void *, int offset, int avail);
+				 void *, int offset);
 
 /* Unique indices for remoteproc devices */
 static DEFINE_IDA(rproc_dev_index);
@@ -306,7 +306,6 @@ void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring)
  * rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
  * @rproc: the remote processor
  * @rsc: the vring resource descriptor
- * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
  *
  * This resource entry requests the host to statically register a virtio
  * device (vdev), and setup everything needed to support it. It contains
@@ -330,19 +329,12 @@ void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring)
  * Returns 0 on success, or an appropriate error code otherwise
  */
 static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
-			     int offset, int avail)
+			     int offset)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
 	int i, ret;
 
-	/* make sure resource isn't truncated */
-	if (sizeof(*rsc) + rsc->num_of_vrings * sizeof(struct fw_rsc_vdev_vring)
-			+ rsc->config_len > avail) {
-		dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc is truncated\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
 	if (rsc->reserved[0] || rsc->reserved[1]) {
 		dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -394,7 +386,6 @@ free_rvdev:
  * rproc_handle_trace() - handle a shared trace buffer resource
  * @rproc: the remote processor
  * @rsc: the trace resource descriptor
- * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
  *
  * In case the remote processor dumps trace logs into memory,
  * export it via debugfs.
@@ -407,18 +398,13 @@ free_rvdev:
  * Returns 0 on success, or an appropriate error code otherwise
  */
 static int rproc_handle_trace(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_trace *rsc,
-			      int offset, int avail)
+			      int offset)
 {
 	struct rproc_mem_entry *trace;
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	void *ptr;
 	char name[15];
 
-	if (sizeof(*rsc) > avail) {
-		dev_err(dev, "trace rsc is truncated\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
 	if (rsc->reserved) {
 		dev_err(dev, "trace rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -465,7 +451,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_trace(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_trace *rsc,
  * rproc_handle_devmem() - handle devmem resource entry
  * @rproc: remote processor handle
  * @rsc: the devmem resource entry
- * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
  *
  * Remote processors commonly need to access certain on-chip peripherals.
  *
@@ -487,7 +472,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_trace(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_trace *rsc,
  * are outside those ranges.
  */
 static int rproc_handle_devmem(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_devmem *rsc,
-			       int offset, int avail)
+			       int offset)
 {
 	struct rproc_mem_entry *mapping;
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
@@ -497,11 +482,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_devmem(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_devmem *rsc,
 	if (!rproc->domain)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (sizeof(*rsc) > avail) {
-		dev_err(dev, "devmem rsc is truncated\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
 	if (rsc->reserved) {
 		dev_err(dev, "devmem rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -543,7 +523,6 @@ out:
  * rproc_handle_carveout() - handle phys contig memory allocation requests
  * @rproc: rproc handle
  * @rsc: the resource entry
- * @avail: size of available data (for image validation)
  *
  * This function will handle firmware requests for allocation of physically
  * contiguous memory regions.
@@ -559,7 +538,7 @@ out:
  */
 static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
 				 struct fw_rsc_carveout *rsc,
-				 int offset, int avail)
+				 int offset)
 {
 	struct rproc_mem_entry *carveout, *mapping;
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
@@ -567,11 +546,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
 	void *va;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (sizeof(*rsc) > avail) {
-		dev_err(dev, "carveout rsc is truncated\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
 	if (rsc->reserved) {
 		dev_err(dev, "carveout rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -680,7 +654,7 @@ free_carv:
 }
 
 static int rproc_count_vrings(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
-			      int offset, int avail)
+			      int offset)
 {
 	/* Summarize the number of notification IDs */
 	rproc->max_notifyid += rsc->num_of_vrings;
@@ -714,15 +688,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_resources(struct rproc *rproc, int len,
 	for (i = 0; i < rproc->table_ptr->num; i++) {
 		int offset = rproc->table_ptr->offset[i];
 		struct fw_rsc_hdr *hdr = (void *)rproc->table_ptr + offset;
-		int avail = len - offset - sizeof(*hdr);
 		void *rsc = (void *)hdr + sizeof(*hdr);
 
-		/* make sure table isn't truncated */
-		if (avail < 0) {
-			dev_err(dev, "rsc table is truncated\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
 		dev_dbg(dev, "rsc: type %d\n", hdr->type);
 
 		if (hdr->type >= RSC_LAST) {
@@ -734,7 +701,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_resources(struct rproc *rproc, int len,
 		if (!handler)
 			continue;
 
-		ret = handler(rproc, rsc, offset + sizeof(*hdr), avail);
+		ret = handler(rproc, rsc, offset + sizeof(*hdr));
 		if (ret)
 			break;
 	}
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
To: <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>, <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: <loic.pallardy@st.com>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@stlinux.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 16/19] remoteproc: core: Clean-up resource table sanity checks
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:50:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472676622-32533-17-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472676622-32533-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com>

As resource table has been verified after just loading,
the different sanity checks done when accessing resources
are no more needed.

Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 47 ++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index b43553f..462cf79 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(rproc_list);
 typedef int (*rproc_handle_resources_t)(struct rproc *rproc,
 				struct resource_table *table, int len);
 typedef int (*rproc_handle_resource_t)(struct rproc *rproc,
-				 void *, int offset, int avail);
+				 void *, int offset);
 
 /* Unique indices for remoteproc devices */
 static DEFINE_IDA(rproc_dev_index);
@@ -306,7 +306,6 @@ void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring)
  * rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
  * @rproc: the remote processor
  * @rsc: the vring resource descriptor
- * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
  *
  * This resource entry requests the host to statically register a virtio
  * device (vdev), and setup everything needed to support it. It contains
@@ -330,19 +329,12 @@ void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring)
  * Returns 0 on success, or an appropriate error code otherwise
  */
 static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
-			     int offset, int avail)
+			     int offset)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
 	int i, ret;
 
-	/* make sure resource isn't truncated */
-	if (sizeof(*rsc) + rsc->num_of_vrings * sizeof(struct fw_rsc_vdev_vring)
-			+ rsc->config_len > avail) {
-		dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc is truncated\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
 	if (rsc->reserved[0] || rsc->reserved[1]) {
 		dev_err(dev, "vdev rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -394,7 +386,6 @@ free_rvdev:
  * rproc_handle_trace() - handle a shared trace buffer resource
  * @rproc: the remote processor
  * @rsc: the trace resource descriptor
- * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
  *
  * In case the remote processor dumps trace logs into memory,
  * export it via debugfs.
@@ -407,18 +398,13 @@ free_rvdev:
  * Returns 0 on success, or an appropriate error code otherwise
  */
 static int rproc_handle_trace(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_trace *rsc,
-			      int offset, int avail)
+			      int offset)
 {
 	struct rproc_mem_entry *trace;
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	void *ptr;
 	char name[15];
 
-	if (sizeof(*rsc) > avail) {
-		dev_err(dev, "trace rsc is truncated\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
 	if (rsc->reserved) {
 		dev_err(dev, "trace rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -465,7 +451,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_trace(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_trace *rsc,
  * rproc_handle_devmem() - handle devmem resource entry
  * @rproc: remote processor handle
  * @rsc: the devmem resource entry
- * @avail: size of available data (for sanity checking the image)
  *
  * Remote processors commonly need to access certain on-chip peripherals.
  *
@@ -487,7 +472,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_trace(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_trace *rsc,
  * are outside those ranges.
  */
 static int rproc_handle_devmem(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_devmem *rsc,
-			       int offset, int avail)
+			       int offset)
 {
 	struct rproc_mem_entry *mapping;
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
@@ -497,11 +482,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_devmem(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_devmem *rsc,
 	if (!rproc->domain)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (sizeof(*rsc) > avail) {
-		dev_err(dev, "devmem rsc is truncated\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
 	if (rsc->reserved) {
 		dev_err(dev, "devmem rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -543,7 +523,6 @@ out:
  * rproc_handle_carveout() - handle phys contig memory allocation requests
  * @rproc: rproc handle
  * @rsc: the resource entry
- * @avail: size of available data (for image validation)
  *
  * This function will handle firmware requests for allocation of physically
  * contiguous memory regions.
@@ -559,7 +538,7 @@ out:
  */
 static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
 				 struct fw_rsc_carveout *rsc,
-				 int offset, int avail)
+				 int offset)
 {
 	struct rproc_mem_entry *carveout, *mapping;
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
@@ -567,11 +546,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
 	void *va;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (sizeof(*rsc) > avail) {
-		dev_err(dev, "carveout rsc is truncated\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* make sure reserved bytes are zeroes */
 	if (rsc->reserved) {
 		dev_err(dev, "carveout rsc has non zero reserved bytes\n");
@@ -680,7 +654,7 @@ free_carv:
 }
 
 static int rproc_count_vrings(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
-			      int offset, int avail)
+			      int offset)
 {
 	/* Summarize the number of notification IDs */
 	rproc->max_notifyid += rsc->num_of_vrings;
@@ -714,15 +688,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_resources(struct rproc *rproc, int len,
 	for (i = 0; i < rproc->table_ptr->num; i++) {
 		int offset = rproc->table_ptr->offset[i];
 		struct fw_rsc_hdr *hdr = (void *)rproc->table_ptr + offset;
-		int avail = len - offset - sizeof(*hdr);
 		void *rsc = (void *)hdr + sizeof(*hdr);
 
-		/* make sure table isn't truncated */
-		if (avail < 0) {
-			dev_err(dev, "rsc table is truncated\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
 		dev_dbg(dev, "rsc: type %d\n", hdr->type);
 
 		if (hdr->type >= RSC_LAST) {
@@ -734,7 +701,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_resources(struct rproc *rproc, int len,
 		if (!handler)
 			continue;
 
-		ret = handler(rproc, rsc, offset + sizeof(*hdr), avail);
+		ret = handler(rproc, rsc, offset + sizeof(*hdr));
 		if (ret)
 			break;
 	}
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-31 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-31 20:50 [PATCH v2 00/19] remoteproc: Allow platform-specific drivers to request resources Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] remoteproc: core: New API to add new resources to the resource table Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to dump " Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to amend an existing resource table entry Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to append a new " Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to over-ride current resource table Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] remoteproc: core: Add explicit message error if cached table failed Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-01  7:09   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:40     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08  9:40       ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] remoteproc: Add new resource type for resource table spare bytes Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-15 17:54   ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-09-16  9:02     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-16  9:02       ` loic pallardy
2016-09-16 17:12       ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-09-19  7:50         ` loic pallardy
2016-09-19  7:50           ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] remoteproc: core: Associate action to resource request Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-01  7:23   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:43     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08  9:43       ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08 11:03       ` Lee Jones
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] remoteproc: core: Finalize dump resource table function Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08  8:26   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:46     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08  9:46       ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to verify an existing resource in rsc table Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to get resource table spare bytes information Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08  8:32   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:47     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08  9:47       ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] remoteproc: core: Add vdev support and force mode to resource amending function Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08  8:48   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:49     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08  9:49       ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08 11:02       ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08 13:11         ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08 13:11           ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] remoteproc: core: Append resource only if spare resource present Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08  9:33   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:54     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08  9:54       ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08 11:00       ` Lee Jones
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] remoteproc: core: Add resource request action support Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to verify resource table consistency Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` Loic Pallardy [this message]
2016-08-31 20:50   ` [PATCH v2 16/19] remoteproc: core: Clean-up resource table sanity checks Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] remotecore: core: Add resource table pointer argument to rproc_handle_resource Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to create remoteproc local resource table Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08 10:20   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08 13:15     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08 13:15       ` loic pallardy
2016-09-15 18:58   ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-09-19  7:46     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-19  7:46       ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] remoteproc: core: Support empty resource tables Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50   ` Loic Pallardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1472676622-32533-17-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --to=loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.