All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Take S1 walks into account when determining S2 write faults
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:37:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475149021-13288-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> (raw)

The WnR bit in the HSR/ESR_EL2 indicates whether a data abort was
generated by a read or a write instruction. For stage 2 data aborts
generated by a stage 1 translation table walk (i.e. the actual page
table access faults at EL2), the WnR bit therefore reports whether the
instruction generating the walk was a load or a store, *not* whether the
page table walker was reading or writing the entry.

For page tables marked as read-only at stage 2 (e.g. due to KSM merging
them with the tables from another guest), this could result in livelock,
where a page table walk generated by a load instruction attempts to
set the access flag in the stage 1 descriptor, but fails to trigger
CoW in the host since only a read fault is reported.

This patch modifies the arm64 kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite function to
take into account stage 2 faults in stage 1 walks. Since DBM cannot be
disabled at EL2 for CPUs that implement it, we assume that these faults
are always causes by writes, avoiding the livelock situation at the
expense of occasional, spurious CoWs.

We could, in theory, do a bit better by checking the guest TCR
configuration and inspecting the page table to see why the PTE faulted.
However, I doubt this is measurable in practice, and the threat of
livelock is real.

Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 4cdeae3b17c6..948a9a8a9297 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -167,11 +167,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_isvalid(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_ISV);
 }
 
-static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WNR);
-}
-
 static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_issext(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_SSE);
@@ -192,6 +187,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_S1PTW);
 }
 
+static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WNR) ||
+		kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(vcpu); /* AF/DBM update */
+}
+
 static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_is_cm(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_CM);
-- 
2.1.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Take S1 walks into account when determining S2 write faults
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:37:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475149021-13288-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> (raw)

The WnR bit in the HSR/ESR_EL2 indicates whether a data abort was
generated by a read or a write instruction. For stage 2 data aborts
generated by a stage 1 translation table walk (i.e. the actual page
table access faults at EL2), the WnR bit therefore reports whether the
instruction generating the walk was a load or a store, *not* whether the
page table walker was reading or writing the entry.

For page tables marked as read-only at stage 2 (e.g. due to KSM merging
them with the tables from another guest), this could result in livelock,
where a page table walk generated by a load instruction attempts to
set the access flag in the stage 1 descriptor, but fails to trigger
CoW in the host since only a read fault is reported.

This patch modifies the arm64 kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite function to
take into account stage 2 faults in stage 1 walks. Since DBM cannot be
disabled at EL2 for CPUs that implement it, we assume that these faults
are always causes by writes, avoiding the livelock situation at the
expense of occasional, spurious CoWs.

We could, in theory, do a bit better by checking the guest TCR
configuration and inspecting the page table to see why the PTE faulted.
However, I doubt this is measurable in practice, and the threat of
livelock is real.

Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 4cdeae3b17c6..948a9a8a9297 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -167,11 +167,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_isvalid(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_ISV);
 }
 
-static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WNR);
-}
-
 static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_issext(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_SSE);
@@ -192,6 +187,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_S1PTW);
 }
 
+static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WNR) ||
+		kvm_vcpu_dabt_iss1tw(vcpu); /* AF/DBM update */
+}
+
 static inline bool kvm_vcpu_dabt_is_cm(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_CM);
-- 
2.1.4

             reply	other threads:[~2016-09-29 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-29 11:37 Will Deacon [this message]
2016-09-29 11:37 ` [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Take S1 walks into account when determining S2 write faults Will Deacon
2016-09-29 15:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-09-29 15:36   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-09-29 17:16 ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-29 17:16   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-29 19:14 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-29 19:14   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-10-17 10:20   ` Will Deacon
2016-10-17 10:20     ` Will Deacon
2016-10-17 10:28     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-10-17 10:28       ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1475149021-13288-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.