From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> To: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 10/14] libnvdimm, namespace: update label implementation for multi-pmem Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 09:39:34 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <147585837408.22349.11125786887021701571.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <147585832067.22349.6376523541984122050.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> Instead of assuming that there will only ever be one allocated range at the start of the region, account for additional namespaces that might start at an offset from the region base. After this change pmem namespaces now have a reason to carry an array of resources similar to blk. Unifying the resource tracking infrastructure in nd_namespace_common is a future cleanup candidate. Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> --- drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c index c37357210428..fac7cabe8f56 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c @@ -494,12 +494,13 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, struct nd_namespace_pmem *nspm, int pos) { - u64 cookie = nd_region_interleave_set_cookie(nd_region), rawsize; + u64 cookie = nd_region_interleave_set_cookie(nd_region); struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping); - struct nd_namespace_label *victim_label; + struct nd_label_ent *label_ent, *victim = NULL; struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label; struct nd_namespace_index *nsindex; - struct nd_label_ent *label_ent; + struct nd_label_id label_id; + struct resource *res; unsigned long *free; u32 nslot, slot; size_t offset; @@ -508,6 +509,16 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, if (!preamble_next(ndd, &nsindex, &free, &nslot)) return -ENXIO; + nd_label_gen_id(&label_id, nspm->uuid, 0); + for_each_dpa_resource(ndd, res) + if (strcmp(res->name, label_id.id) == 0) + break; + + if (!res) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return -ENXIO; + } + /* allocate and write the label to the staging (next) index */ slot = nd_label_alloc_slot(ndd); if (slot == UINT_MAX) @@ -523,11 +534,10 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, nd_label->nlabel = __cpu_to_le16(nd_region->ndr_mappings); nd_label->position = __cpu_to_le16(pos); nd_label->isetcookie = __cpu_to_le64(cookie); - rawsize = div_u64(resource_size(&nspm->nsio.res), - nd_region->ndr_mappings); - nd_label->rawsize = __cpu_to_le64(rawsize); - nd_label->dpa = __cpu_to_le64(nd_mapping->start); + nd_label->rawsize = __cpu_to_le64(resource_size(res)); + nd_label->dpa = __cpu_to_le64(res->start); nd_label->slot = __cpu_to_le32(slot); + nd_dbg_dpa(nd_region, ndd, res, "%s\n", __func__); /* update label */ offset = nd_label_offset(ndd, nd_label); @@ -538,22 +548,39 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, /* Garbage collect the previous label */ mutex_lock(&nd_mapping->lock); - label_ent = list_first_entry_or_null(&nd_mapping->labels, - typeof(*label_ent), list); - WARN_ON(!label_ent); - victim_label = label_ent ? label_ent->label : NULL; - if (victim_label) { - label_ent->label = NULL; - slot = to_slot(ndd, victim_label); - nd_label_free_slot(ndd, slot); + list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) { + if (!label_ent->label) + continue; + if (memcmp(nspm->uuid, label_ent->label->uuid, + NSLABEL_UUID_LEN) != 0) + continue; + victim = label_ent; + list_move_tail(&victim->list, &nd_mapping->labels); + break; + } + if (victim) { dev_dbg(ndd->dev, "%s: free: %d\n", __func__, slot); + slot = to_slot(ndd, victim->label); + nd_label_free_slot(ndd, slot); + victim->label = NULL; } /* update index */ rc = nd_label_write_index(ndd, ndd->ns_next, nd_inc_seq(__le32_to_cpu(nsindex->seq)), 0); - if (rc == 0 && label_ent) - label_ent->label = nd_label; + if (rc == 0) { + list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) + if (!label_ent->label) { + label_ent->label = nd_label; + nd_label = NULL; + break; + } + dev_WARN_ONCE(&nspm->nsio.common.dev, nd_label, + "failed to track label: %d\n", + to_slot(ndd, nd_label)); + if (nd_label) + rc = -ENXIO; + } mutex_unlock(&nd_mapping->lock); return rc; @@ -899,7 +926,9 @@ int nd_pmem_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, for (i = 0; i < nd_region->ndr_mappings; i++) { struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping = &nd_region->mapping[i]; - int rc; + struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping); + struct resource *res; + int rc, count = 0; if (size == 0) { rc = del_labels(nd_mapping, nspm->uuid); @@ -908,7 +937,12 @@ int nd_pmem_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, continue; } - rc = init_labels(nd_mapping, 1); + for_each_dpa_resource(ndd, res) + if (strncmp(res->name, "pmem", 3) == 0) + count++; + WARN_ON_ONCE(!count); + + rc = init_labels(nd_mapping, count); if (rc < 0) return rc; _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> To: linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 10/14] libnvdimm, namespace: update label implementation for multi-pmem Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 09:39:34 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <147585837408.22349.11125786887021701571.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <147585832067.22349.6376523541984122050.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> Instead of assuming that there will only ever be one allocated range at the start of the region, account for additional namespaces that might start at an offset from the region base. After this change pmem namespaces now have a reason to carry an array of resources similar to blk. Unifying the resource tracking infrastructure in nd_namespace_common is a future cleanup candidate. Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> --- drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c index c37357210428..fac7cabe8f56 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c @@ -494,12 +494,13 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, struct nd_namespace_pmem *nspm, int pos) { - u64 cookie = nd_region_interleave_set_cookie(nd_region), rawsize; + u64 cookie = nd_region_interleave_set_cookie(nd_region); struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping); - struct nd_namespace_label *victim_label; + struct nd_label_ent *label_ent, *victim = NULL; struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label; struct nd_namespace_index *nsindex; - struct nd_label_ent *label_ent; + struct nd_label_id label_id; + struct resource *res; unsigned long *free; u32 nslot, slot; size_t offset; @@ -508,6 +509,16 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, if (!preamble_next(ndd, &nsindex, &free, &nslot)) return -ENXIO; + nd_label_gen_id(&label_id, nspm->uuid, 0); + for_each_dpa_resource(ndd, res) + if (strcmp(res->name, label_id.id) == 0) + break; + + if (!res) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return -ENXIO; + } + /* allocate and write the label to the staging (next) index */ slot = nd_label_alloc_slot(ndd); if (slot == UINT_MAX) @@ -523,11 +534,10 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, nd_label->nlabel = __cpu_to_le16(nd_region->ndr_mappings); nd_label->position = __cpu_to_le16(pos); nd_label->isetcookie = __cpu_to_le64(cookie); - rawsize = div_u64(resource_size(&nspm->nsio.res), - nd_region->ndr_mappings); - nd_label->rawsize = __cpu_to_le64(rawsize); - nd_label->dpa = __cpu_to_le64(nd_mapping->start); + nd_label->rawsize = __cpu_to_le64(resource_size(res)); + nd_label->dpa = __cpu_to_le64(res->start); nd_label->slot = __cpu_to_le32(slot); + nd_dbg_dpa(nd_region, ndd, res, "%s\n", __func__); /* update label */ offset = nd_label_offset(ndd, nd_label); @@ -538,22 +548,39 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, /* Garbage collect the previous label */ mutex_lock(&nd_mapping->lock); - label_ent = list_first_entry_or_null(&nd_mapping->labels, - typeof(*label_ent), list); - WARN_ON(!label_ent); - victim_label = label_ent ? label_ent->label : NULL; - if (victim_label) { - label_ent->label = NULL; - slot = to_slot(ndd, victim_label); - nd_label_free_slot(ndd, slot); + list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) { + if (!label_ent->label) + continue; + if (memcmp(nspm->uuid, label_ent->label->uuid, + NSLABEL_UUID_LEN) != 0) + continue; + victim = label_ent; + list_move_tail(&victim->list, &nd_mapping->labels); + break; + } + if (victim) { dev_dbg(ndd->dev, "%s: free: %d\n", __func__, slot); + slot = to_slot(ndd, victim->label); + nd_label_free_slot(ndd, slot); + victim->label = NULL; } /* update index */ rc = nd_label_write_index(ndd, ndd->ns_next, nd_inc_seq(__le32_to_cpu(nsindex->seq)), 0); - if (rc == 0 && label_ent) - label_ent->label = nd_label; + if (rc == 0) { + list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) + if (!label_ent->label) { + label_ent->label = nd_label; + nd_label = NULL; + break; + } + dev_WARN_ONCE(&nspm->nsio.common.dev, nd_label, + "failed to track label: %d\n", + to_slot(ndd, nd_label)); + if (nd_label) + rc = -ENXIO; + } mutex_unlock(&nd_mapping->lock); return rc; @@ -899,7 +926,9 @@ int nd_pmem_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, for (i = 0; i < nd_region->ndr_mappings; i++) { struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping = &nd_region->mapping[i]; - int rc; + struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping); + struct resource *res; + int rc, count = 0; if (size == 0) { rc = del_labels(nd_mapping, nspm->uuid); @@ -908,7 +937,12 @@ int nd_pmem_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region, continue; } - rc = init_labels(nd_mapping, 1); + for_each_dpa_resource(ndd, res) + if (strncmp(res->name, "pmem", 3) == 0) + count++; + WARN_ON_ONCE(!count); + + rc = init_labels(nd_mapping, count); if (rc < 0) return rc;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-07 16:42 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-10-07 16:38 [PATCH 00/14] libnvdimm: support sub-divisions of pmem for 4.9 Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:38 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:38 ` [PATCH 01/14] libnvdimm, region: move region-mapping input-paramters to nd_mapping_desc Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:38 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:38 ` [PATCH 02/14] libnvdimm, label: convert label tracking to a linked list Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:38 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:38 ` [PATCH 03/14] libnvdimm, namespace: refactor uuid_show() into a namespace_to_uuid() helper Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:38 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 04/14] libnvdimm, namespace: unify blk and pmem label scanning Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 05/14] tools/testing/nvdimm: support for sub-dividing a pmem region Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 06/14] libnvdimm, namespace: allow multiple pmem-namespaces per region at scan time Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 07/14] libnvdimm, namespace: sort namespaces by dpa at init Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 08/14] libnvdimm, region: update nd_region_available_dpa() for multi-pmem support Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 09/14] libnvdimm, namespace: expand pmem device naming scheme for multi-pmem Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams [this message] 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 10/14] libnvdimm, namespace: update label implementation " Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 11/14] libnvdimm, namespace: enable allocation of multiple pmem namespaces Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 12/14] libnvdimm, namespace: filter out of range labels in scan_labels() Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 13/14] libnvdimm, namespace: lift single pmem limit " Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` [PATCH 14/14] libnvdimm, namespace: allow creation of multiple pmem-namespaces per region Dan Williams 2016-10-07 16:39 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 18:19 ` [PATCH 00/14] libnvdimm: support sub-divisions of pmem for 4.9 Linda Knippers 2016-10-07 18:19 ` Linda Knippers 2016-10-07 19:52 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 19:52 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 21:42 ` Linda Knippers 2016-10-07 21:42 ` Linda Knippers 2016-10-07 23:38 ` Dan Williams 2016-10-07 23:38 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=147585837408.22349.11125786887021701571.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \ --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.