All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64/cpufeatures: Enforce inline/const properties of cpus_have_const_cap
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:58:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484740725-24776-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw)

Despite being flagged "inline", cpus_have_const_cap may end-up being
placed out of line if the compiler decides so. This would be unfortunate,
as we want to be able to use this function in HYP, where we need to
be 100% sure of what is mapped there. __always_inline seems to be a
better choice given the constraint.

Also, be a lot tougher on non-const or out-of-range capability values
(a non-const cap value shouldn't be used here, and the semantic of an
OOR value is at best ill defined). In those two case, BUILD_BUG_ON is
what you get.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index b4989df..4710469 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -105,10 +105,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_have_feature(unsigned int num)
 }
 
 /* System capability check for constant caps */
-static inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
+static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
 {
-	if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS)
-		return false;
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(num));
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(num >= ARM64_NCAPS);
+
 	return static_branch_unlikely(&cpu_hwcap_keys[num]);
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4

             reply	other threads:[~2017-01-18 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18 11:58 Marc Zyngier [this message]
2017-01-19 14:37 ` [PATCH] arm64/cpufeatures: Enforce inline/const properties of cpus_have_const_cap Will Deacon
2017-01-19 14:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-19 14:48     ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1484740725-24776-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.