All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] xfs: pull up iolock from xfs_free_eofblocks()
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:00:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484852411-1137-2-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484852411-1137-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>

xfs_free_eofblocks() requires the IOLOCK_EXCL lock, but is called from
different contexts where the lock may or may not be held. The
need_iolock parameter exists for this reason, to indicate whether
xfs_free_eofblocks() must acquire the iolock itself before it can
proceed.

This is ugly and confusing. Simplify the semantics of
xfs_free_eofblocks() to require the caller to acquire the iolock
appropriately and kill the need_iolock parameter. While here, the mp
param can be removed as well as the xfs_mount is accessible from the
xfs_inode structure. This patch does not change behavior.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h |  3 +--
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c    | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c     | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index b9abce5..81fac29 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -909,17 +909,18 @@ xfs_can_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool force)
  */
 int
 xfs_free_eofblocks(
-	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
-	xfs_inode_t	*ip,
-	bool		need_iolock)
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
 {
-	xfs_trans_t	*tp;
-	int		error;
-	xfs_fileoff_t	end_fsb;
-	xfs_fileoff_t	last_fsb;
-	xfs_filblks_t	map_len;
-	int		nimaps;
-	xfs_bmbt_irec_t	imap;
+	struct xfs_trans	*tp;
+	int			error;
+	xfs_fileoff_t		end_fsb;
+	xfs_fileoff_t		last_fsb;
+	xfs_filblks_t		map_len;
+	int			nimaps;
+	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	imap;
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
+
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
 
 	/*
 	 * Figure out if there are any blocks beyond the end
@@ -936,6 +937,10 @@ xfs_free_eofblocks(
 	error = xfs_bmapi_read(ip, end_fsb, map_len, &imap, &nimaps, 0);
 	xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
 
+	/*
+	 * If there are blocks after the end of file, truncate the file to its
+	 * current size to free them up.
+	 */
 	if (!error && (nimaps != 0) &&
 	    (imap.br_startblock != HOLESTARTBLOCK ||
 	     ip->i_delayed_blks)) {
@@ -946,22 +951,10 @@ xfs_free_eofblocks(
 		if (error)
 			return error;
 
-		/*
-		 * There are blocks after the end of file.
-		 * Free them up now by truncating the file to
-		 * its current size.
-		 */
-		if (need_iolock) {
-			if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL))
-				return -EAGAIN;
-		}
-
 		error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate, 0, 0, 0,
 				&tp);
 		if (error) {
 			ASSERT(XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp));
-			if (need_iolock)
-				xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
 			return error;
 		}
 
@@ -989,8 +982,6 @@ xfs_free_eofblocks(
 		}
 
 		xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
-		if (need_iolock)
-			xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
 	}
 	return error;
 }
@@ -1407,7 +1398,7 @@ xfs_shift_file_space(
 	 * into the accessible region of the file.
 	 */
 	if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip, true)) {
-		error = xfs_free_eofblocks(mp, ip, false);
+		error = xfs_free_eofblocks(ip);
 		if (error)
 			return error;
 	}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h
index 68a621a..f100539 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h
@@ -63,8 +63,7 @@ int	xfs_insert_file_space(struct xfs_inode *, xfs_off_t offset,
 
 /* EOF block manipulation functions */
 bool	xfs_can_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool force);
-int	xfs_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_inode *ip,
-			   bool need_iolock);
+int	xfs_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip);
 
 int	xfs_swap_extents(struct xfs_inode *ip, struct xfs_inode *tip,
 			 struct xfs_swapext *sx);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index 70ca4f6..c6b698f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ xfs_inode_free_eofblocks(
 	int			flags,
 	void			*args)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 	struct xfs_eofblocks *eofb = args;
 	bool need_iolock = true;
 	int match;
@@ -1358,19 +1358,25 @@ xfs_inode_free_eofblocks(
 			return 0;
 
 		/*
-		 * A scan owner implies we already hold the iolock. Skip it in
-		 * xfs_free_eofblocks() to avoid deadlock. This also eliminates
-		 * the possibility of EAGAIN being returned.
+		 * A scan owner implies we already hold the iolock. Skip it here
+		 * to avoid deadlock.
 		 */
 		if (eofb->eof_scan_owner == ip->i_ino)
 			need_iolock = false;
 	}
 
-	ret = xfs_free_eofblocks(ip->i_mount, ip, need_iolock);
-
-	/* don't revisit the inode if we're not waiting */
-	if (ret == -EAGAIN && !(flags & SYNC_WAIT))
-		ret = 0;
+	/*
+	 * If the caller is waiting, return -EAGAIN to keep the background
+	 * scanner moving and revisit the inode in a subsequent pass.
+	 */
+	if (need_iolock && !xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) {
+		if (flags & SYNC_WAIT)
+			ret = -EAGAIN;
+		return ret;
+	}
+	ret = xfs_free_eofblocks(ip);
+	if (need_iolock)
+		xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
 
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index b955779..b9cab64 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -1692,32 +1692,34 @@ xfs_release(
 	if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip, false)) {
 
 		/*
+		 * Check if the inode is being opened, written and closed
+		 * frequently and we have delayed allocation blocks outstanding
+		 * (e.g. streaming writes from the NFS server), truncating the
+		 * blocks past EOF will cause fragmentation to occur.
+		 *
+		 * In this case don't do the truncation, but we have to be
+		 * careful how we detect this case. Blocks beyond EOF show up as
+		 * i_delayed_blks even when the inode is clean, so we need to
+		 * truncate them away first before checking for a dirty release.
+		 * Hence on the first dirty close we will still remove the
+		 * speculative allocation, but after that we will leave it in
+		 * place.
+		 */
+		if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IDIRTY_RELEASE))
+			return 0;
+		/*
 		 * If we can't get the iolock just skip truncating the blocks
 		 * past EOF because we could deadlock with the mmap_sem
-		 * otherwise.  We'll get another chance to drop them once the
+		 * otherwise. We'll get another chance to drop them once the
 		 * last reference to the inode is dropped, so we'll never leak
 		 * blocks permanently.
-		 *
-		 * Further, check if the inode is being opened, written and
-		 * closed frequently and we have delayed allocation blocks
-		 * outstanding (e.g. streaming writes from the NFS server),
-		 * truncating the blocks past EOF will cause fragmentation to
-		 * occur.
-		 *
-		 * In this case don't do the truncation, either, but we have to
-		 * be careful how we detect this case. Blocks beyond EOF show
-		 * up as i_delayed_blks even when the inode is clean, so we
-		 * need to truncate them away first before checking for a dirty
-		 * release. Hence on the first dirty close we will still remove
-		 * the speculative allocation, but after that we will leave it
-		 * in place.
 		 */
-		if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IDIRTY_RELEASE))
-			return 0;
-
-		error = xfs_free_eofblocks(mp, ip, true);
-		if (error && error != -EAGAIN)
-			return error;
+		if (xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) {
+			error = xfs_free_eofblocks(ip);
+			xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
+			if (error)
+				return error;
+		}
 
 		/* delalloc blocks after truncation means it really is dirty */
 		if (ip->i_delayed_blks)
@@ -1903,8 +1905,11 @@ xfs_inactive(
 		 * cache. Post-eof blocks must be freed, lest we end up with
 		 * broken free space accounting.
 		 */
-		if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip, true))
-			xfs_free_eofblocks(mp, ip, false);
+		if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip, true)) {
+			xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
+			xfs_free_eofblocks(ip);
+			xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
+		}
 
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-19 19:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] xfs: eofblocks serialization fixes Brian Foster
2017-01-19 19:00 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-01-20  9:57   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] xfs: pull up iolock from xfs_free_eofblocks() Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-19 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] xfs: sync eofblocks scans under iolock are livelock prone Brian Foster
2017-01-20 10:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-19 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] xfs: fix eofblocks race with file extending async dio writes Brian Foster
2017-01-20 10:03   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1484852411-1137-2-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.