From: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>, Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org> Cc: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org>, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Trilok Soni <tsoni@codeaurora.org> Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: Move rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:48:48 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1485222528-20603-1-git-send-email-spjoshi@codeaurora.org> (raw) The "remoteproc{0,1...}" sysfs entries are added in rproc_add() and deleted in rproc_type_release() instead of in rproc_del(). That leaves these lingering entries sticking around after we return from rproc_del(). Move the rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() to fix this. Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 953ee29..78200a7 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1315,8 +1315,6 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev) dev_info(&rproc->dev, "releasing %s\n", rproc->name); - rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc); - idr_destroy(&rproc->notifyids); if (rproc->index >= 0) @@ -1491,6 +1489,8 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc) if (rproc->auto_boot) rproc_shutdown(rproc); + rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc); + /* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */ mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex); list_del(&rproc->node); -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: spjoshi@codeaurora.org (Sarangdhar Joshi) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: Move rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:48:48 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1485222528-20603-1-git-send-email-spjoshi@codeaurora.org> (raw) The "remoteproc{0,1...}" sysfs entries are added in rproc_add() and deleted in rproc_type_release() instead of in rproc_del(). That leaves these lingering entries sticking around after we return from rproc_del(). Move the rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() to fix this. Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 953ee29..78200a7 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1315,8 +1315,6 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev) dev_info(&rproc->dev, "releasing %s\n", rproc->name); - rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc); - idr_destroy(&rproc->notifyids); if (rproc->index >= 0) @@ -1491,6 +1489,8 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc) if (rproc->auto_boot) rproc_shutdown(rproc); + rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc); + /* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */ mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex); list_del(&rproc->node); -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next reply other threads:[~2017-01-24 1:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-01-24 1:48 Sarangdhar Joshi [this message] 2017-01-24 1:48 ` [PATCH] remoteproc: Move rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() Sarangdhar Joshi 2017-01-30 22:01 ` Bjorn Andersson 2017-01-30 22:01 ` Bjorn Andersson 2017-01-30 22:13 ` Bjorn Andersson 2017-01-30 22:13 ` Bjorn Andersson 2017-01-30 22:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1485222528-20603-1-git-send-email-spjoshi@codeaurora.org \ --to=spjoshi@codeaurora.org \ --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \ --cc=ohad@wizery.com \ --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \ --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \ --cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.