All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
To: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] clk: fix reentrancy of clk_enable() on UP systems
Date: Thu,  4 Jan 2018 19:46:08 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515116768-17089-1-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com> (raw)

Reentrant calls to clk_enable() are not working on UP systems. This is
caused by the fact spin_trylock_irqsave() always returns true when
CONFIG_SMP=n (and CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=n) which causes the reference
counting to not work correctly when clk_enable_lock() is called twice
before clk_enable_unlock() is called (this happens when clk_enable()
is called from within another clk_enable()).

This fixes the problem by skipping the call to spin_trylock_irqsave() on UP
systems and relying solely on reference counting. We also make sure to set
flags in this case so that we are not returning an uninitialized value.

Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
---

v2 changes:
* Use fix suggested by Stephen Boyd

 drivers/clk/clk.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 83c8df7..5add75b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -143,10 +143,18 @@ static unsigned long clk_enable_lock(void)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&enable_lock, flags)) {
+	/*
+	 * On UP systems, spin_trylock_irqsave() always returns true, even if
+	 * we already hold the lock. So, in that case, we rely only on
+	 * reference counting.
+	 */
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) ||
+	    !spin_trylock_irqsave(&enable_lock, flags)) {
 		if (enable_owner == current) {
 			enable_refcnt++;
 			__acquire(enable_lock);
+			if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
+				local_save_flags(flags);
 			return flags;
 		}
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&enable_lock, flags);
-- 
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2018-01-05  1:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-05  1:46 David Lechner [this message]
2018-01-10 21:40 ` [PATCH v2] clk: fix reentrancy of clk_enable() on UP systems Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1515116768-17089-1-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com \
    --to=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.