All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] s390: define ISOLATE_BP to run tasks with modified branch prediction
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:07:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516712825-2917-5-git-send-email-schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516712825-2917-1-git-send-email-schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>

Define the ISOLATE_BP macro to enable the use of the PR_ISOLATE_BP process
control to switch a task from the standard branch prediction to a modified,
more secure but slower behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h   |  3 +++
 arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h |  4 +++
 arch/s390/kernel/entry.S            | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 arch/s390/kernel/processor.c        |  8 ++++++
 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
index 5f37f9c..99ee222 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -378,6 +378,9 @@ extern void memcpy_absolute(void *, void *, size_t);
 	memcpy_absolute(&(dest), &__tmp, sizeof(__tmp));	\
 } while (0)
 
+extern int s390_isolate_bp(void);
+#define ISOLATE_BP s390_isolate_bp
+
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
 #endif /* __ASM_S390_PROCESSOR_H */
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 0880a37..301b4f7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src);
 #define TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE	4	/* load guarded storage control block */
 #define TIF_PATCH_PENDING	5	/* pending live patching update */
 #define TIF_PGSTE		6	/* New mm's will use 4K page tables */
+#define TIF_ISOLATE_BP		8	/* Run process with isolated BP */
+#define TIF_ISOLATE_BP_GUEST	9	/* Run KVM guests with isolated BP */
 
 #define TIF_31BIT		16	/* 32bit process */
 #define TIF_MEMDIE		17	/* is terminating due to OOM killer */
@@ -80,6 +82,8 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src);
 #define _TIF_UPROBE		_BITUL(TIF_UPROBE)
 #define _TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE	_BITUL(TIF_GUARDED_STORAGE)
 #define _TIF_PATCH_PENDING	_BITUL(TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
+#define _TIF_ISOLATE_BP		_BITUL(TIF_ISOLATE_BP)
+#define _TIF_ISOLATE_BP_GUEST	_BITUL(TIF_ISOLATE_BP_GUEST)
 
 #define _TIF_31BIT		_BITUL(TIF_31BIT)
 #define _TIF_SINGLE_STEP	_BITUL(TIF_SINGLE_STEP)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
index dab716b..07e4e46 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ _PIF_WORK	= (_PIF_PER_TRAP | _PIF_SYSCALL_RESTART)
 	aghi	%r15,-(STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD + __PT_SIZE)
 	j	3f
 1:	UPDATE_VTIME %r14,%r15,\timer
+	BPENTER __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_ISOLATE_BP
 2:	lg	%r15,__LC_ASYNC_STACK	# load async stack
 3:	la	%r11,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD(%r15)
 	.endm
@@ -187,6 +188,40 @@ _PIF_WORK	= (_PIF_PER_TRAP | _PIF_SYSCALL_RESTART)
 	.popsection
 	.endm
 
+	.macro BPENTER tif_ptr,tif_mask
+	.pushsection .altinstr_replacement, "ax"
+662:	.word	0xc004, 0x0000, 0x0000	# 6 byte nop
+	.word	0xc004, 0x0000, 0x0000	# 6 byte nop
+	.popsection
+664:	TSTMSK	\tif_ptr,\tif_mask
+	jz	. + 8
+	.long	0xb2e8d000
+	.pushsection .altinstructions, "a"
+	.long 664b - .
+	.long 662b - .
+	.word 82
+	.byte 12
+	.byte 12
+	.popsection
+	.endm
+
+	.macro BPEXIT tif_ptr,tif_mask
+	TSTMSK	\tif_ptr,\tif_mask
+	.pushsection .altinstr_replacement, "ax"
+662:	jnz	. + 8
+	.long	0xb2e8d000
+	.popsection
+664:	jz	. + 8
+	.long	0xb2e8c000
+	.pushsection .altinstructions, "a"
+	.long 664b - .
+	.long 662b - .
+	.word 82
+	.byte 8
+	.byte 8
+	.popsection
+	.endm
+
 	.section .kprobes.text, "ax"
 .Ldummy:
 	/*
@@ -240,9 +275,11 @@ ENTRY(__switch_to)
  */
 ENTRY(sie64a)
 	stmg	%r6,%r14,__SF_GPRS(%r15)	# save kernel registers
+	lg	%r12,__LC_CURRENT
 	stg	%r2,__SF_EMPTY(%r15)		# save control block pointer
 	stg	%r3,__SF_EMPTY+8(%r15)		# save guest register save area
 	xc	__SF_EMPTY+16(8,%r15),__SF_EMPTY+16(%r15) # reason code = 0
+	mvc	__SF_EMPTY+24(8,%r15),__TI_flags(%r12) # copy thread flags
 	TSTMSK	__LC_CPU_FLAGS,_CIF_FPU		# load guest fp/vx registers ?
 	jno	.Lsie_load_guest_gprs
 	brasl	%r14,load_fpu_regs		# load guest fp/vx regs
@@ -259,11 +296,12 @@ ENTRY(sie64a)
 	jnz	.Lsie_skip
 	TSTMSK	__LC_CPU_FLAGS,_CIF_FPU
 	jo	.Lsie_skip			# exit if fp/vx regs changed
-	BPON
+	BPEXIT	__SF_EMPTY+24(%r15),(_TIF_ISOLATE_BP|_TIF_ISOLATE_BP_GUEST)
 .Lsie_entry:
 	sie	0(%r14)
 .Lsie_exit:
 	BPOFF
+	BPENTER	__SF_EMPTY+24(%r15),(_TIF_ISOLATE_BP|_TIF_ISOLATE_BP_GUEST)
 .Lsie_skip:
 	ni	__SIE_PROG0C+3(%r14),0xfe	# no longer in SIE
 	lctlg	%c1,%c1,__LC_USER_ASCE		# load primary asce
@@ -318,6 +356,7 @@ ENTRY(system_call)
 	la	%r11,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD(%r15)	# pointer to pt_regs
 .Lsysc_vtime:
 	UPDATE_VTIME %r8,%r9,__LC_SYNC_ENTER_TIMER
+	BPENTER __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_ISOLATE_BP
 	stmg	%r0,%r7,__PT_R0(%r11)
 	mvc	__PT_R8(64,%r11),__LC_SAVE_AREA_SYNC
 	mvc	__PT_PSW(16,%r11),__LC_SVC_OLD_PSW
@@ -354,7 +393,7 @@ ENTRY(system_call)
 	jnz	.Lsysc_work			# check for work
 	TSTMSK	__LC_CPU_FLAGS,_CIF_WORK
 	jnz	.Lsysc_work
-	BPON
+	BPEXIT	__TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_ISOLATE_BP
 .Lsysc_restore:
 	lg	%r14,__LC_VDSO_PER_CPU
 	lmg	%r0,%r10,__PT_R0(%r11)
@@ -589,6 +628,7 @@ ENTRY(pgm_check_handler)
 	aghi	%r15,-(STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD + __PT_SIZE)
 	j	4f
 2:	UPDATE_VTIME %r14,%r15,__LC_SYNC_ENTER_TIMER
+	BPENTER __TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_ISOLATE_BP
 	lg	%r15,__LC_KERNEL_STACK
 	lgr	%r14,%r12
 	aghi	%r14,__TASK_thread	# pointer to thread_struct
@@ -702,7 +742,7 @@ ENTRY(io_int_handler)
 	mvc	__LC_RETURN_PSW(16),__PT_PSW(%r11)
 	tm	__PT_PSW+1(%r11),0x01	# returning to user ?
 	jno	.Lio_exit_kernel
-	BPON
+	BPEXIT	__TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_ISOLATE_BP
 .Lio_exit_timer:
 	stpt	__LC_EXIT_TIMER
 	mvc	__VDSO_ECTG_BASE(16,%r14),__LC_EXIT_TIMER
@@ -1118,7 +1158,7 @@ ENTRY(mcck_int_handler)
 	mvc	__LC_RETURN_MCCK_PSW(16),__PT_PSW(%r11) # move return PSW
 	tm	__LC_RETURN_MCCK_PSW+1,0x01 # returning to user ?
 	jno	0f
-	BPON
+	BPEXIT	__TI_flags(%r12),_TIF_ISOLATE_BP
 	stpt	__LC_EXIT_TIMER
 	mvc	__VDSO_ECTG_BASE(16,%r14),__LC_EXIT_TIMER
 0:	lmg	%r11,%r15,__PT_R11(%r11)
@@ -1245,7 +1285,8 @@ cleanup_critical:
 	clg     %r9,BASED(.Lsie_crit_mcck_length)
 	jh      1f
 	oi      __LC_CPU_FLAGS+7, _CIF_MCCK_GUEST
-1:	lg	%r9,__SF_EMPTY(%r15)		# get control block pointer
+1:	BPENTER __SF_EMPTY+24(%r15),(_TIF_ISOLATE_BP|_TIF_ISOLATE_BP_GUEST)
+	lg	%r9,__SF_EMPTY(%r15)		# get control block pointer
 	ni	__SIE_PROG0C+3(%r9),0xfe	# no longer in SIE
 	lctlg	%c1,%c1,__LC_USER_ASCE		# load primary asce
 	larl	%r9,sie_exit			# skip forward to sie_exit
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c b/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
index 5362fd8..5159636 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c
@@ -197,3 +197,11 @@ const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = {
 	.stop	= c_stop,
 	.show	= show_cpuinfo,
 };
+
+int s390_isolate_bp(void)
+{
+	if (!test_facility(82))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	set_thread_flag(TIF_ISOLATE_BP);
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-23 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-23 13:07 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] s390: improve speculative execution handling v2 Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 17:07   ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-01-24  6:29     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-24  8:37       ` Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control] Dominik Brodowski
2018-01-24  9:24         ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-24  9:24           ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-24 11:15         ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-24 12:48           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-24 19:01             ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-24 20:46               ` Alan Cox
2018-01-29 13:14                 ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-29 20:12                   ` Alan Cox
2018-01-24 15:42         ` Alan Cox
2018-01-24  8:08     ` [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-23 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 13:59   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-01-23 14:40     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 15:04       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-01-23 13:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390: add options to change branch prediction behaviour for the kernel Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 13:07 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2018-01-23 14:21   ` [PATCH 4/5] s390: define ISOLATE_BP to run tasks with modified branch prediction Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-23 14:21     ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-23 20:32     ` Radim Krčmář
2018-01-24  6:36       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-24 11:50         ` Radim Krčmář
2018-01-23 13:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-23 13:09   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-23 14:32     ` Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1516712825-2917-5-git-send-email-schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=meissner@suse.de \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.