All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
	"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io>, Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] ima: re-evaluate files on privileged mounted filesystems
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:33:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519335184-17808-3-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519335184-17808-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This patch addresses the fuse privileged mounted filesystems in a "secure"
environment, with a correctly enforced security policy, which is willing
to assume the inherent risk of specific fuse filesystems that are well
defined and properly implemented.

As there is no way for the kernel to detect file changes, the kernel
ignores the cached file integrity results and re-measures, re-appraises,
and re-audits the file.

Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io>
Cc: Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index a5d225ffc388..f550f25294a3 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/xattr.h>
 #include <linux/ima.h>
 #include <linux/iversion.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
 
 #include "ima.h"
 
@@ -230,9 +231,17 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
 				 IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK | IMA_APPRAISED_SUBMASK |
 				 IMA_ACTION_FLAGS);
 
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(IMA_CHANGE_XATTR, &iint->atomic_flags))
-		/* reset all flags if ima_inode_setxattr was called */
+	/*
+	 * Re-evaulate the file if either the xattr has changed or the
+	 * kernel has no way of detecting file change on the filesystem.
+	 * (Limited to privileged mounted filesystems.)
+	 */
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(IMA_CHANGE_XATTR, &iint->atomic_flags) ||
+	    ((inode->i_sb->s_iflags & SB_I_IMA_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGNATURE) &&
+	     !(inode->i_sb->s_iflags & SB_I_UNTRUSTED_MOUNTER))) {
 		iint->flags &= ~IMA_DONE_MASK;
+		iint->measured_pcrs = 0;
+	}
 
 	/* Determine if already appraised/measured based on bitmask
 	 * (IMA_MEASURE, IMA_MEASURED, IMA_XXXX_APPRAISE, IMA_XXXX_APPRAISED,
-- 
2.7.5

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] ima: re-evaluate files on privileged mounted filesystems
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:33:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519335184-17808-3-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519335184-17808-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This patch addresses the fuse privileged mounted filesystems in a "secure"
environment, with a correctly enforced security policy, which is willing
to assume the inherent risk of specific fuse filesystems that are well
defined and properly implemented.

As there is no way for the kernel to detect file changes, the kernel
ignores the cached file integrity results and re-measures, re-appraises,
and re-audits the file.

Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io>
Cc: Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index a5d225ffc388..f550f25294a3 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/xattr.h>
 #include <linux/ima.h>
 #include <linux/iversion.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
 
 #include "ima.h"
 
@@ -230,9 +231,17 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
 				 IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK | IMA_APPRAISED_SUBMASK |
 				 IMA_ACTION_FLAGS);
 
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(IMA_CHANGE_XATTR, &iint->atomic_flags))
-		/* reset all flags if ima_inode_setxattr was called */
+	/*
+	 * Re-evaulate the file if either the xattr has changed or the
+	 * kernel has no way of detecting file change on the filesystem.
+	 * (Limited to privileged mounted filesystems.)
+	 */
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(IMA_CHANGE_XATTR, &iint->atomic_flags) ||
+	    ((inode->i_sb->s_iflags & SB_I_IMA_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGNATURE) &&
+	     !(inode->i_sb->s_iflags & SB_I_UNTRUSTED_MOUNTER))) {
 		iint->flags &= ~IMA_DONE_MASK;
+		iint->measured_pcrs = 0;
+	}
 
 	/* Determine if already appraised/measured based on bitmask
 	 * (IMA_MEASURE, IMA_MEASURED, IMA_XXXX_APPRAISE, IMA_XXXX_APPRAISED,
-- 
2.7.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-22 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-22 21:33 [PATCH v2 0/4] ima: unverifiable file signatures Mimi Zohar
2018-02-22 21:33 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-22 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ima: fail file signature verification on non-init mounted filesystems Mimi Zohar
2018-02-22 21:33   ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-27  1:47   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-02-27  1:47     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-02-27 15:33     ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-27 15:33       ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-27 15:33       ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-22 21:33 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2018-02-22 21:33   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ima: re-evaluate files on privileged " Mimi Zohar
2018-02-22 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ima: fail signature verification based on policy Mimi Zohar
2018-02-22 21:33   ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-27 22:35   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-02-27 22:35     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-02-28 11:38     ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-28 11:38       ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-28 11:38       ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-28 15:30       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-02-28 15:30         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-02-28 15:30         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-03-02 21:10         ` Mimi Zohar
2018-03-02 21:10           ` Mimi Zohar
2018-03-02 21:10           ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-22 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] fuse: define the filesystem as untrusted Mimi Zohar
2018-02-22 21:33   ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-23  4:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] ima: unverifiable file signatures James Morris
2018-02-23  4:00   ` James Morris
2018-02-27  2:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-02-27  2:08   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-02-27 16:17   ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-27 16:17     ` Mimi Zohar
2018-02-27 16:17     ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1519335184-17808-3-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alban@kinvolk.io \
    --cc=dongsu@kinvolk.io \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.