From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: stm32: add 'depends on HAS_IOMEM' to fix unmet dependency
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 20:15:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520334956-9900-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> (raw)
These configs select MFD_SYSCON, but do not depend on HAS_IOMEM.
Compile testing on architecture without HAS_IOMEM causes "unmet
direct dependencies" in Kconfig phase.
Detected by "make ARCH=score allyesconfig".
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
---
Arnd Bergmann and I discussed how to fix unmet dependency of MFD_SYSCON.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/27/284
We agreed to add 'depends on HAS_IOMEM' to drivers causing
unmet dependency.
drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig
index 1c4e00b2..cd3936e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig
@@ -11,37 +11,37 @@ config PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F429
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F429 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F429
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F429
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F469
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F469 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F469
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F469
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F746
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F746 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F746
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F746
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F769
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F769 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F769
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F769
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32H743
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32H743 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32H743
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32H743
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32MP157
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32MP157
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32MP157
select PINCTRL_STM32
endif
--
2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: stm32: add 'depends on HAS_IOMEM' to fix unmet dependency
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 20:15:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520334956-9900-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> (raw)
These configs select MFD_SYSCON, but do not depend on HAS_IOMEM.
Compile testing on architecture without HAS_IOMEM causes "unmet
direct dependencies" in Kconfig phase.
Detected by "make ARCH=score allyesconfig".
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
---
Arnd Bergmann and I discussed how to fix unmet dependency of MFD_SYSCON.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/27/284
We agreed to add 'depends on HAS_IOMEM' to drivers causing
unmet dependency.
drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig
index 1c4e00b2..cd3936e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig
@@ -11,37 +11,37 @@ config PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F429
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F429 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F429
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F429
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F469
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F469 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F469
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F469
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F746
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F746 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F746
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F746
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F769
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F769 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F769
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F769
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32H743
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32H743 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32H743
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32H743
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32MP157
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32MP157
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32MP157
select PINCTRL_STM32
endif
--
2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: yamada.masahiro@socionext.com (Masahiro Yamada)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: stm32: add 'depends on HAS_IOMEM' to fix unmet dependency
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 20:15:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520334956-9900-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> (raw)
These configs select MFD_SYSCON, but do not depend on HAS_IOMEM.
Compile testing on architecture without HAS_IOMEM causes "unmet
direct dependencies" in Kconfig phase.
Detected by "make ARCH=score allyesconfig".
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
---
Arnd Bergmann and I discussed how to fix unmet dependency of MFD_SYSCON.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/27/284
We agreed to add 'depends on HAS_IOMEM' to drivers causing
unmet dependency.
drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig
index 1c4e00b2..cd3936e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig
@@ -11,37 +11,37 @@ config PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F429
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F429 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F429
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F429
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F469
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F469 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F469
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F469
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F746
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F746 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F746
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F746
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32F769
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F769 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32F769
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32F769
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32H743
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32H743 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32H743
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32H743
select PINCTRL_STM32
config PINCTRL_STM32MP157
bool "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_STM32MP157
- depends on OF
+ depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM
default MACH_STM32MP157
select PINCTRL_STM32
endif
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-03-06 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-06 11:15 Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2018-03-06 11:15 ` [PATCH] pinctrl: stm32: add 'depends on HAS_IOMEM' to fix unmet dependency Masahiro Yamada
2018-03-06 11:15 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-03-23 3:05 ` Linus Walleij
2018-03-23 3:05 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1520334956-9900-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--to=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.barre@st.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.