All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v5 00/10] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:57:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <155327387405.225273.9325594075351253804.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)

Changes since v4 [1]:
- Given v4 was from March of 2017 the bulk of the changes result from
  rebasing the patch set from a v4.11-rc2 baseline to v5.1-rc1.

- A unit test is added to ndctl to exercise the creation and dax
  mounting of multiple independent namespaces in a single 128M section.

[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/717383/

---

Quote patch7:

"The libnvdimm sub-system has suffered a series of hacks and broken
 workarounds for the memory-hotplug implementation's awkward
 section-aligned (128MB) granularity. For example the following backtrace
 is emitted when attempting arch_add_memory() with physical address
 ranges that intersect 'System RAM' (RAM) with 'Persistent Memory' (PMEM)
 within a given section:
 
  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 558 at kernel/memremap.c:300 devm_memremap_pages+0x3b5/0x4c0
  devm_memremap_pages attempted on mixed region [mem 0x200000000-0x2fbffffff flags 0x200]
  [..]
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0x86/0xc3
    __warn+0xcb/0xf0
    warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80
    devm_memremap_pages+0x3b5/0x4c0
    __wrap_devm_memremap_pages+0x58/0x70 [nfit_test_iomap]
    pmem_attach_disk+0x19a/0x440 [nd_pmem]
 
 Recently it was discovered that the problem goes beyond RAM vs PMEM
 collisions as some platform produce PMEM vs PMEM collisions within a
 given section. The libnvdimm workaround for that case revealed that the
 libnvdimm section-alignment-padding implementation has been broken for a
 long while. A fix for that long-standing breakage introduces as many
 problems as it solves as it would require a backward-incompatible change
 to the namespace metadata interpretation. Instead of that dubious route
 [2], address the root problem in the memory-hotplug implementation."

The approach is taken is to observe that each section already maintains
an array of 'unsigned long' values to hold the pageblock_flags. A single
additional 'unsigned long' is added to house a 'sub-section active'
bitmask. Each bit tracks the mapped state of one sub-section's worth of
capacity which is SECTION_SIZE / BITS_PER_LONG, or 2MB on x86-64.

The implication of allowing sections to be piecemeal mapped/unmapped is
that the valid_section() helper is no longer authoritative to determine
if a section is fully mapped. Instead pfn_valid() is updated to consult
the section-active bitmask. Given that typical memory hotplug still has
deep "section" dependencies the sub-section capability is limited to
'want_memblock=false' invocations of arch_add_memory(), effectively only
devm_memremap_pages() users for now.

With this in place the hacks in the libnvdimm sub-system can be
dropped, and other devm_memremap_pages() users need no longer be
constrained to 128MB mapping granularity.

[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/155000671719.348031.2347363160141119237.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com

---

Dan Williams (10):
      mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage
      mm/sparsemem: Introduce common definitions for the size and mask of a section
      mm/sparsemem: Add helpers track active portions of a section at boot
      mm/hotplug: Prepare shrink_{zone,pgdat}_span for sub-section removal
      mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap()
      mm/sparsemem: Prepare for sub-section ranges
      mm/sparsemem: Support sub-section hotplug
      mm/devm_memremap_pages: Enable sub-section remap
      libnvdimm/pfn: Fix fsdax-mode namespace info-block zero-fields
      libnvdimm/pfn: Stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment


 arch/x86/mm/init_64.c          |   15 +-
 drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c      |    2 
 drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h           |   12 -
 drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c      |   93 +++-------
 include/linux/memory_hotplug.h |    7 -
 include/linux/mm.h             |    4 
 include/linux/mmzone.h         |   60 ++++++
 kernel/memremap.c              |   57 ++----
 mm/hmm.c                       |    2 
 mm/memory_hotplug.c            |  119 +++++++-----
 mm/page_alloc.c                |    6 -
 mm/sparse-vmemmap.c            |   21 +-
 mm/sparse.c                    |  382 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 13 files changed, 476 insertions(+), 304 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
	"Toshi Kani" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
	"Jeff Moyer" <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 00/10] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:57:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <155327387405.225273.9325594075351253804.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)

Changes since v4 [1]:
- Given v4 was from March of 2017 the bulk of the changes result from
  rebasing the patch set from a v4.11-rc2 baseline to v5.1-rc1.

- A unit test is added to ndctl to exercise the creation and dax
  mounting of multiple independent namespaces in a single 128M section.

[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/717383/

---

Quote patch7:

"The libnvdimm sub-system has suffered a series of hacks and broken
 workarounds for the memory-hotplug implementation's awkward
 section-aligned (128MB) granularity. For example the following backtrace
 is emitted when attempting arch_add_memory() with physical address
 ranges that intersect 'System RAM' (RAM) with 'Persistent Memory' (PMEM)
 within a given section:
 
  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 558 at kernel/memremap.c:300 devm_memremap_pages+0x3b5/0x4c0
  devm_memremap_pages attempted on mixed region [mem 0x200000000-0x2fbffffff flags 0x200]
  [..]
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0x86/0xc3
    __warn+0xcb/0xf0
    warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80
    devm_memremap_pages+0x3b5/0x4c0
    __wrap_devm_memremap_pages+0x58/0x70 [nfit_test_iomap]
    pmem_attach_disk+0x19a/0x440 [nd_pmem]
 
 Recently it was discovered that the problem goes beyond RAM vs PMEM
 collisions as some platform produce PMEM vs PMEM collisions within a
 given section. The libnvdimm workaround for that case revealed that the
 libnvdimm section-alignment-padding implementation has been broken for a
 long while. A fix for that long-standing breakage introduces as many
 problems as it solves as it would require a backward-incompatible change
 to the namespace metadata interpretation. Instead of that dubious route
 [2], address the root problem in the memory-hotplug implementation."

The approach is taken is to observe that each section already maintains
an array of 'unsigned long' values to hold the pageblock_flags. A single
additional 'unsigned long' is added to house a 'sub-section active'
bitmask. Each bit tracks the mapped state of one sub-section's worth of
capacity which is SECTION_SIZE / BITS_PER_LONG, or 2MB on x86-64.

The implication of allowing sections to be piecemeal mapped/unmapped is
that the valid_section() helper is no longer authoritative to determine
if a section is fully mapped. Instead pfn_valid() is updated to consult
the section-active bitmask. Given that typical memory hotplug still has
deep "section" dependencies the sub-section capability is limited to
'want_memblock=false' invocations of arch_add_memory(), effectively only
devm_memremap_pages() users for now.

With this in place the hacks in the libnvdimm sub-system can be
dropped, and other devm_memremap_pages() users need no longer be
constrained to 128MB mapping granularity.

[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/155000671719.348031.2347363160141119237.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com

---

Dan Williams (10):
      mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage
      mm/sparsemem: Introduce common definitions for the size and mask of a section
      mm/sparsemem: Add helpers track active portions of a section at boot
      mm/hotplug: Prepare shrink_{zone,pgdat}_span for sub-section removal
      mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap()
      mm/sparsemem: Prepare for sub-section ranges
      mm/sparsemem: Support sub-section hotplug
      mm/devm_memremap_pages: Enable sub-section remap
      libnvdimm/pfn: Fix fsdax-mode namespace info-block zero-fields
      libnvdimm/pfn: Stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment


 arch/x86/mm/init_64.c          |   15 +-
 drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c      |    2 
 drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h           |   12 -
 drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c      |   93 +++-------
 include/linux/memory_hotplug.h |    7 -
 include/linux/mm.h             |    4 
 include/linux/mmzone.h         |   60 ++++++
 kernel/memremap.c              |   57 ++----
 mm/hmm.c                       |    2 
 mm/memory_hotplug.c            |  119 +++++++-----
 mm/page_alloc.c                |    6 -
 mm/sparse-vmemmap.c            |   21 +-
 mm/sparse.c                    |  382 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 13 files changed, 476 insertions(+), 304 deletions(-)

             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-22 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-22 16:57 Dan Williams [this message]
2019-03-22 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:57   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] mm/sparsemem: Introduce common definitions for the size and mask of a section Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] mm/sparsemem: Add helpers track active portions of a section at boot Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] mm/hotplug: Prepare shrink_{zone, pgdat}_span for sub-section removal Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap() Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] mm/sparsemem: Prepare for sub-section ranges Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] mm/sparsemem: Support sub-section hotplug Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] mm/devm_memremap_pages: Enable sub-section remap Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] libnvdimm/pfn: Fix fsdax-mode namespace info-block zero-fields Dan Williams
2019-03-22 16:58   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-27 14:00   ` Sasha Levin
2019-03-22 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] libnvdimm/pfn: Stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment Dan Williams
2019-03-22 18:05 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support Michal Hocko
2019-03-22 18:05   ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-22 18:32   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-22 18:32     ` Dan Williams
2019-03-25 10:19     ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-25 10:19       ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-25 14:28       ` Jeff Moyer
2019-03-25 14:28         ` Jeff Moyer
2019-03-25 14:50         ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-25 14:50           ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-25 20:03       ` Dan Williams
2019-03-25 20:03         ` Dan Williams
2019-03-26  8:04         ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-26  8:04           ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-27  0:20           ` Dan Williams
2019-03-27 16:13             ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-27 16:13               ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-27 16:17               ` Dan Williams
2019-03-27 16:17                 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-28 13:38               ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 13:38                 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 14:16                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-28 14:16                   ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-01  9:18             ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 20:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 20:10   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 20:43   ` Dan Williams
2019-03-28 21:17     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 21:17       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 21:32       ` Dan Williams
2019-03-28 21:32         ` Dan Williams
2019-03-28 21:54         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-03-28 21:54           ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-10  9:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-10  9:51   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=155327387405.225273.9325594075351253804.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.