All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	cpandya@codeaurora.org, arunks@codeaurora.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, osalvador@suse.de, logang@deltatee.com,
	pasha.tatashin@oracle.com, david@redhat.com, cai@lca.pw
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] mm/hotplug: Reorder arch_remove_memory() call in __remove_memory()
Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2019 10:00:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1554265806-11501-5-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554265806-11501-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

Memory hot remove uses get_nid_for_pfn() while tearing down linked sysfs
entries between memory block and node. It first checks pfn validity with
pfn_valid_within() before fetching nid. With CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE config
(arm64 has this enabled) pfn_valid_within() calls pfn_valid().

pfn_valid() is an arch implementation on arm64 (CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID)
which scans all mapped memblock regions with memblock_is_map_memory(). This
creates a problem in memory hot remove path which has already removed given
memory range from memory block with memblock_[remove|free] before arriving
at unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(). Hence get_nid_for_pfn() returns -1
skipping subsequent sysfs_remove_link() calls leaving node <-> memory block
sysfs entries as is. Subsequent memory add operation hits BUG_ON() because
of existing sysfs entries.

[   62.007176] NUMA: Unknown node for memory at 0x680000000, assuming node 0
[   62.052517] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   62.053211] kernel BUG at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1143!
[   62.053868] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[   62.054589] Modules linked in:
[   62.054999] CPU: 19 PID: 3275 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.1.0-rc2-00004-g28cea40b2683 #41
[   62.056274] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[   62.057166] pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO)
[   62.058083] pc : add_memory_resource+0x1cc/0x1d8
[   62.058961] lr : add_memory_resource+0x10c/0x1d8
[   62.059842] sp : ffff0000168b3ce0
[   62.060477] x29: ffff0000168b3ce0 x28: ffff8005db546c00
[   62.061501] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[   62.062509] x25: ffff0000111ef000 x24: ffff0000111ef5d0
[   62.063520] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000006bfffffff
[   62.064540] x21: 00000000ffffffef x20: 00000000006c0000
[   62.065558] x19: 0000000000680000 x18: 0000000000000024
[   62.066566] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
[   62.067579] x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: ffff8005e412e890
[   62.068588] x13: ffff8005d6b105d8 x12: 0000000000000000
[   62.069610] x11: ffff8005d6b10490 x10: 0000000000000040
[   62.070615] x9 : ffff8005e412e898 x8 : ffff8005e412e890
[   62.071631] x7 : ffff8005d6b105d8 x6 : ffff8005db546c00
[   62.072640] x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000002
[   62.073654] x3 : ffff8005d7049480 x2 : 0000000000000002
[   62.074666] x1 : 0000000000000003 x0 : 00000000ffffffef
[   62.075685] Process bash (pid: 3275, stack limit = 0x00000000d754280f)
[   62.076930] Call trace:
[   62.077411]  add_memory_resource+0x1cc/0x1d8
[   62.078227]  __add_memory+0x70/0xa8
[   62.078901]  probe_store+0xa4/0xc8
[   62.079561]  dev_attr_store+0x18/0x28
[   62.080270]  sysfs_kf_write+0x40/0x58
[   62.080992]  kernfs_fop_write+0xcc/0x1d8
[   62.081744]  __vfs_write+0x18/0x40
[   62.082400]  vfs_write+0xa4/0x1b0
[   62.083037]  ksys_write+0x5c/0xc0
[   62.083681]  __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
[   62.084432]  el0_svc_handler+0x88/0x100
[   62.085177]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc

Re-ordering arch_remove_memory() with memblock_[free|remove] solves the
problem on arm64 as pfn_valid() behaves correctly and returns positive
as memblock for the address range still exists. arch_remove_memory()
removes applicable memory sections from zone with __remove_pages() and
tears down kernel linear mapping. Removing memblock regions afterwards
is consistent.

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 mm/memory_hotplug.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 0082d69..71d0d79 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1872,11 +1872,10 @@ void __ref __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 
 	/* remove memmap entry */
 	firmware_map_remove(start, start + size, "System RAM");
+	arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL);
 	memblock_free(start, size);
 	memblock_remove(start, size);
 
-	arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL);
-
 	try_offline_node(nid);
 
 	mem_hotplug_done();
-- 
2.7.4


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, mhocko@suse.com, david@redhat.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cai@lca.pw, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com,
	logang@deltatee.com, james.morse@arm.com, cpandya@codeaurora.org,
	arunks@codeaurora.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, osalvador@suse.de
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] mm/hotplug: Reorder arch_remove_memory() call in __remove_memory()
Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2019 10:00:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1554265806-11501-5-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554265806-11501-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

Memory hot remove uses get_nid_for_pfn() while tearing down linked sysfs
entries between memory block and node. It first checks pfn validity with
pfn_valid_within() before fetching nid. With CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE config
(arm64 has this enabled) pfn_valid_within() calls pfn_valid().

pfn_valid() is an arch implementation on arm64 (CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID)
which scans all mapped memblock regions with memblock_is_map_memory(). This
creates a problem in memory hot remove path which has already removed given
memory range from memory block with memblock_[remove|free] before arriving
at unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(). Hence get_nid_for_pfn() returns -1
skipping subsequent sysfs_remove_link() calls leaving node <-> memory block
sysfs entries as is. Subsequent memory add operation hits BUG_ON() because
of existing sysfs entries.

[   62.007176] NUMA: Unknown node for memory at 0x680000000, assuming node 0
[   62.052517] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   62.053211] kernel BUG at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1143!
[   62.053868] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[   62.054589] Modules linked in:
[   62.054999] CPU: 19 PID: 3275 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.1.0-rc2-00004-g28cea40b2683 #41
[   62.056274] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[   62.057166] pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO)
[   62.058083] pc : add_memory_resource+0x1cc/0x1d8
[   62.058961] lr : add_memory_resource+0x10c/0x1d8
[   62.059842] sp : ffff0000168b3ce0
[   62.060477] x29: ffff0000168b3ce0 x28: ffff8005db546c00
[   62.061501] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[   62.062509] x25: ffff0000111ef000 x24: ffff0000111ef5d0
[   62.063520] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000006bfffffff
[   62.064540] x21: 00000000ffffffef x20: 00000000006c0000
[   62.065558] x19: 0000000000680000 x18: 0000000000000024
[   62.066566] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
[   62.067579] x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: ffff8005e412e890
[   62.068588] x13: ffff8005d6b105d8 x12: 0000000000000000
[   62.069610] x11: ffff8005d6b10490 x10: 0000000000000040
[   62.070615] x9 : ffff8005e412e898 x8 : ffff8005e412e890
[   62.071631] x7 : ffff8005d6b105d8 x6 : ffff8005db546c00
[   62.072640] x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000002
[   62.073654] x3 : ffff8005d7049480 x2 : 0000000000000002
[   62.074666] x1 : 0000000000000003 x0 : 00000000ffffffef
[   62.075685] Process bash (pid: 3275, stack limit = 0x00000000d754280f)
[   62.076930] Call trace:
[   62.077411]  add_memory_resource+0x1cc/0x1d8
[   62.078227]  __add_memory+0x70/0xa8
[   62.078901]  probe_store+0xa4/0xc8
[   62.079561]  dev_attr_store+0x18/0x28
[   62.080270]  sysfs_kf_write+0x40/0x58
[   62.080992]  kernfs_fop_write+0xcc/0x1d8
[   62.081744]  __vfs_write+0x18/0x40
[   62.082400]  vfs_write+0xa4/0x1b0
[   62.083037]  ksys_write+0x5c/0xc0
[   62.083681]  __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
[   62.084432]  el0_svc_handler+0x88/0x100
[   62.085177]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc

Re-ordering arch_remove_memory() with memblock_[free|remove] solves the
problem on arm64 as pfn_valid() behaves correctly and returns positive
as memblock for the address range still exists. arch_remove_memory()
removes applicable memory sections from zone with __remove_pages() and
tears down kernel linear mapping. Removing memblock regions afterwards
is consistent.

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 mm/memory_hotplug.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 0082d69..71d0d79 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1872,11 +1872,10 @@ void __ref __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 
 	/* remove memmap entry */
 	firmware_map_remove(start, start + size, "System RAM");
+	arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL);
 	memblock_free(start, size);
 	memblock_remove(start, size);
 
-	arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL);
-
 	try_offline_node(nid);
 
 	mem_hotplug_done();
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-03  4:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-03  4:30 [PATCH 0/6] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove and ZONE_DEVICE Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  4:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  4:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64/mm: Enable sysfs based memory hot add interface Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  4:30   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  8:20   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  8:20     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03 13:12     ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-03 13:12       ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-04  5:21       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  5:21         ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  5:25     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  5:25       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  8:49       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-04  8:49         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  4:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  4:30   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 12:37   ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-03 12:37     ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-03 13:15     ` Steven Price
2019-04-03 13:15       ` Steven Price
2019-04-04  6:51       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  6:51         ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  5:39     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  5:39       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 11:58       ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-04 11:58         ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-04 13:03         ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 13:03           ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 15:19           ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-04 15:19             ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03 17:32   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-04-03 17:32     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-04-03 17:57     ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-03 17:57       ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-04  8:23       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  8:23         ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  7:07     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  7:07       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  9:16       ` Steven Price
2019-04-04  9:16         ` Steven Price
2019-04-03  4:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64/mm: Enable struct page allocation from device memory Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  4:30   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  4:30 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2019-04-03  4:30   ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/hotplug: Reorder arch_remove_memory() call in __remove_memory() Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  8:45   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  8:45     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03  9:17   ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  9:17     ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-04  8:32     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  8:32       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  9:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  9:30     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  4:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/memremap: Rename and consolidate SECTION_SIZE Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  4:30   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  9:26   ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  9:26     ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03  9:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  9:30     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03  4:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64/mm: Enable ZONE_DEVICE Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03  4:30   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 13:58   ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-03 13:58     ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-03 16:07     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-03 16:07       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-04  5:03       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  5:03         ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  4:42     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  4:42       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  5:04       ` Dan Williams
2019-04-04  5:04         ` Dan Williams
2019-04-04  9:46         ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-04  9:46           ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-07 22:11           ` Dan Williams
2019-04-07 22:11             ` Dan Williams
2019-04-08  4:03             ` Ira Weiny
2019-04-08  4:03               ` Ira Weiny
2019-04-08  6:03               ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-08  6:03                 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 18:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove and ZONE_DEVICE Dan Williams
2019-04-03 18:08   ` Dan Williams
2019-04-03 18:08   ` Dan Williams
2019-04-04 13:11   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 13:11     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  9:46 ` [RFC 1/2] mm/vmemmap: Enable vmem_altmap based base page mapping for vmemmap Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  9:46   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  9:46   ` [RFC 2/2] arm64/mm: Enable ZONE_DEVICE for all page configs Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04  9:46     ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1554265806-11501-5-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cpandya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.