From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Subject: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Simplify protection flag creation for kernel huge mappings Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 09:28:15 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1558929495-19898-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw) Even though they have got the same value, PMD_TYPE_SECT and PUD_TYPE_SECT get used for kernel huge mappings. But before that first the table bit gets cleared using leaf level PTE_TABLE_BIT. Though functionally they are same, we should use page table level specific macros to be consistent as per the MMU specifications. Create page table level specific wrappers for kernel huge mapping entries and just drop mk_sect_prot() which does not have any other user. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 9 +++++++-- arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 8 ++------ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h index 2c41b04708fe..6478dd121228 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -335,9 +335,14 @@ static inline pmd_t pte_pmd(pte_t pte) return __pmd(pte_val(pte)); } -static inline pgprot_t mk_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot) +static inline pgprot_t mk_pud_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot) { - return __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT); + return __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PUD_TABLE_BIT) | PUD_TYPE_SECT); +} + +static inline pgprot_t mk_pmd_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot) +{ + return __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PMD_TABLE_BIT) | PMD_TYPE_SECT); } #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c index a1bfc4413982..22c2e4f0768f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c @@ -971,9 +971,7 @@ int __init arch_ioremap_pmd_supported(void) int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) { - pgprot_t sect_prot = __pgprot(PUD_TYPE_SECT | - pgprot_val(mk_sect_prot(prot))); - pud_t new_pud = pfn_pud(__phys_to_pfn(phys), sect_prot); + pud_t new_pud = pfn_pud(__phys_to_pfn(phys), mk_pud_sect_prot(prot)); /* Only allow permission changes for now */ if (!pgattr_change_is_safe(READ_ONCE(pud_val(*pudp)), @@ -987,9 +985,7 @@ int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) int pmd_set_huge(pmd_t *pmdp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) { - pgprot_t sect_prot = __pgprot(PMD_TYPE_SECT | - pgprot_val(mk_sect_prot(prot))); - pmd_t new_pmd = pfn_pmd(__phys_to_pfn(phys), sect_prot); + pmd_t new_pmd = pfn_pmd(__phys_to_pfn(phys), mk_pmd_sect_prot(prot)); /* Only allow permission changes for now */ if (!pgattr_change_is_safe(READ_ONCE(pmd_val(*pmdp)), -- 2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Subject: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Simplify protection flag creation for kernel huge mappings Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 09:28:15 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1558929495-19898-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw) Even though they have got the same value, PMD_TYPE_SECT and PUD_TYPE_SECT get used for kernel huge mappings. But before that first the table bit gets cleared using leaf level PTE_TABLE_BIT. Though functionally they are same, we should use page table level specific macros to be consistent as per the MMU specifications. Create page table level specific wrappers for kernel huge mapping entries and just drop mk_sect_prot() which does not have any other user. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 9 +++++++-- arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 8 ++------ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h index 2c41b04708fe..6478dd121228 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -335,9 +335,14 @@ static inline pmd_t pte_pmd(pte_t pte) return __pmd(pte_val(pte)); } -static inline pgprot_t mk_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot) +static inline pgprot_t mk_pud_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot) { - return __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT); + return __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PUD_TABLE_BIT) | PUD_TYPE_SECT); +} + +static inline pgprot_t mk_pmd_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot) +{ + return __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PMD_TABLE_BIT) | PMD_TYPE_SECT); } #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c index a1bfc4413982..22c2e4f0768f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c @@ -971,9 +971,7 @@ int __init arch_ioremap_pmd_supported(void) int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) { - pgprot_t sect_prot = __pgprot(PUD_TYPE_SECT | - pgprot_val(mk_sect_prot(prot))); - pud_t new_pud = pfn_pud(__phys_to_pfn(phys), sect_prot); + pud_t new_pud = pfn_pud(__phys_to_pfn(phys), mk_pud_sect_prot(prot)); /* Only allow permission changes for now */ if (!pgattr_change_is_safe(READ_ONCE(pud_val(*pudp)), @@ -987,9 +985,7 @@ int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) int pmd_set_huge(pmd_t *pmdp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) { - pgprot_t sect_prot = __pgprot(PMD_TYPE_SECT | - pgprot_val(mk_sect_prot(prot))); - pmd_t new_pmd = pfn_pmd(__phys_to_pfn(phys), sect_prot); + pmd_t new_pmd = pfn_pmd(__phys_to_pfn(phys), mk_pmd_sect_prot(prot)); /* Only allow permission changes for now */ if (!pgattr_change_is_safe(READ_ONCE(pmd_val(*pmdp)), -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-27 3:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-05-27 3:58 Anshuman Khandual [this message] 2019-05-27 3:58 ` [PATCH] arm64/mm: Simplify protection flag creation for kernel huge mappings Anshuman Khandual 2019-06-04 12:51 ` Catalin Marinas 2019-06-04 12:51 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1558929495-19898-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \ --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.