All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
	<yong.wu@mediatek.com>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>, <anan.sun@mediatek.com>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v8 04/21] memory: mtk-smi: Use a struct for the platform data for smi-common
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:09:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1561774167-24141-5-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561774167-24141-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com>

Use a struct as the platform special data instead of the enumeration.

Also there is a minor change that moving the position of
"enum mtk_smi_gen" definition, this is because we expect define
"struct mtk_smi_common_plat" before it is referred.

This is a preparing patch for mt8183.

Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
index 9fd6b3d..8a2f968 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
@@ -49,6 +49,15 @@
 #define SMI_LARB_NONSEC_CON(id)	(0x380 + ((id) * 4))
 #define F_MMU_EN		BIT(0)
 
+enum mtk_smi_gen {
+	MTK_SMI_GEN1,
+	MTK_SMI_GEN2
+};
+
+struct mtk_smi_common_plat {
+	enum mtk_smi_gen gen;
+};
+
 struct mtk_smi_larb_gen {
 	bool need_larbid;
 	int port_in_larb[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX + 1];
@@ -61,6 +70,8 @@ struct mtk_smi {
 	struct clk			*clk_apb, *clk_smi;
 	struct clk			*clk_async; /*only needed by mt2701*/
 	void __iomem			*smi_ao_base;
+
+	const struct mtk_smi_common_plat *plat;
 };
 
 struct mtk_smi_larb { /* larb: local arbiter */
@@ -72,11 +83,6 @@ struct mtk_smi_larb { /* larb: local arbiter */
 	u32				*mmu;
 };
 
-enum mtk_smi_gen {
-	MTK_SMI_GEN1,
-	MTK_SMI_GEN2
-};
-
 static int mtk_smi_enable(const struct mtk_smi *smi)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -351,18 +357,26 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_gen1 = {
+	.gen = MTK_SMI_GEN1,
+};
+
+static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_gen2 = {
+	.gen = MTK_SMI_GEN2,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_smi_common_of_ids[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN2
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen2,
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN1
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen1,
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN2
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen2,
 	},
 	{}
 };
@@ -372,13 +386,13 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct mtk_smi *common;
 	struct resource *res;
-	enum mtk_smi_gen smi_gen;
 	int ret;
 
 	common = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*common), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!common)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	common->dev = dev;
+	common->plat = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
 
 	common->clk_apb = devm_clk_get(dev, "apb");
 	if (IS_ERR(common->clk_apb))
@@ -394,8 +408,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * clock into emi clock domain, but for mtk smi gen2, there's no smi ao
 	 * base.
 	 */
-	smi_gen = (enum mtk_smi_gen)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
-	if (smi_gen == MTK_SMI_GEN1) {
+	if (common->plat->gen == MTK_SMI_GEN1) {
 		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 		common->smi_ao_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
 		if (IS_ERR(common->smi_ao_base))
-- 
1.9.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com,
	yong.wu@mediatek.com, youlin.pei@mediatek.com,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	anan.sun@mediatek.com, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v8 04/21] memory: mtk-smi: Use a struct for the platform data for smi-common
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:09:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1561774167-24141-5-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561774167-24141-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com>

Use a struct as the platform special data instead of the enumeration.

Also there is a minor change that moving the position of
"enum mtk_smi_gen" definition, this is because we expect define
"struct mtk_smi_common_plat" before it is referred.

This is a preparing patch for mt8183.

Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
index 9fd6b3d..8a2f968 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
@@ -49,6 +49,15 @@
 #define SMI_LARB_NONSEC_CON(id)	(0x380 + ((id) * 4))
 #define F_MMU_EN		BIT(0)
 
+enum mtk_smi_gen {
+	MTK_SMI_GEN1,
+	MTK_SMI_GEN2
+};
+
+struct mtk_smi_common_plat {
+	enum mtk_smi_gen gen;
+};
+
 struct mtk_smi_larb_gen {
 	bool need_larbid;
 	int port_in_larb[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX + 1];
@@ -61,6 +70,8 @@ struct mtk_smi {
 	struct clk			*clk_apb, *clk_smi;
 	struct clk			*clk_async; /*only needed by mt2701*/
 	void __iomem			*smi_ao_base;
+
+	const struct mtk_smi_common_plat *plat;
 };
 
 struct mtk_smi_larb { /* larb: local arbiter */
@@ -72,11 +83,6 @@ struct mtk_smi_larb { /* larb: local arbiter */
 	u32				*mmu;
 };
 
-enum mtk_smi_gen {
-	MTK_SMI_GEN1,
-	MTK_SMI_GEN2
-};
-
 static int mtk_smi_enable(const struct mtk_smi *smi)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -351,18 +357,26 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_gen1 = {
+	.gen = MTK_SMI_GEN1,
+};
+
+static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_gen2 = {
+	.gen = MTK_SMI_GEN2,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_smi_common_of_ids[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN2
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen2,
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN1
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen1,
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN2
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen2,
 	},
 	{}
 };
@@ -372,13 +386,13 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct mtk_smi *common;
 	struct resource *res;
-	enum mtk_smi_gen smi_gen;
 	int ret;
 
 	common = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*common), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!common)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	common->dev = dev;
+	common->plat = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
 
 	common->clk_apb = devm_clk_get(dev, "apb");
 	if (IS_ERR(common->clk_apb))
@@ -394,8 +408,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * clock into emi clock domain, but for mtk smi gen2, there's no smi ao
 	 * base.
 	 */
-	smi_gen = (enum mtk_smi_gen)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
-	if (smi_gen == MTK_SMI_GEN1) {
+	if (common->plat->gen == MTK_SMI_GEN1) {
 		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 		common->smi_ao_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
 		if (IS_ERR(common->smi_ao_base))
-- 
1.9.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	 Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com,
	anan.sun@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 04/21] memory: mtk-smi: Use a struct for the platform data for smi-common
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:09:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1561774167-24141-5-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561774167-24141-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com>

Use a struct as the platform special data instead of the enumeration.

Also there is a minor change that moving the position of
"enum mtk_smi_gen" definition, this is because we expect define
"struct mtk_smi_common_plat" before it is referred.

This is a preparing patch for mt8183.

Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
index 9fd6b3d..8a2f968 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
@@ -49,6 +49,15 @@
 #define SMI_LARB_NONSEC_CON(id)	(0x380 + ((id) * 4))
 #define F_MMU_EN		BIT(0)
 
+enum mtk_smi_gen {
+	MTK_SMI_GEN1,
+	MTK_SMI_GEN2
+};
+
+struct mtk_smi_common_plat {
+	enum mtk_smi_gen gen;
+};
+
 struct mtk_smi_larb_gen {
 	bool need_larbid;
 	int port_in_larb[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX + 1];
@@ -61,6 +70,8 @@ struct mtk_smi {
 	struct clk			*clk_apb, *clk_smi;
 	struct clk			*clk_async; /*only needed by mt2701*/
 	void __iomem			*smi_ao_base;
+
+	const struct mtk_smi_common_plat *plat;
 };
 
 struct mtk_smi_larb { /* larb: local arbiter */
@@ -72,11 +83,6 @@ struct mtk_smi_larb { /* larb: local arbiter */
 	u32				*mmu;
 };
 
-enum mtk_smi_gen {
-	MTK_SMI_GEN1,
-	MTK_SMI_GEN2
-};
-
 static int mtk_smi_enable(const struct mtk_smi *smi)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -351,18 +357,26 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_gen1 = {
+	.gen = MTK_SMI_GEN1,
+};
+
+static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_gen2 = {
+	.gen = MTK_SMI_GEN2,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_smi_common_of_ids[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN2
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen2,
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN1
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen1,
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN2
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen2,
 	},
 	{}
 };
@@ -372,13 +386,13 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct mtk_smi *common;
 	struct resource *res;
-	enum mtk_smi_gen smi_gen;
 	int ret;
 
 	common = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*common), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!common)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	common->dev = dev;
+	common->plat = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
 
 	common->clk_apb = devm_clk_get(dev, "apb");
 	if (IS_ERR(common->clk_apb))
@@ -394,8 +408,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * clock into emi clock domain, but for mtk smi gen2, there's no smi ao
 	 * base.
 	 */
-	smi_gen = (enum mtk_smi_gen)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
-	if (smi_gen == MTK_SMI_GEN1) {
+	if (common->plat->gen == MTK_SMI_GEN1) {
 		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 		common->smi_ao_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
 		if (IS_ERR(common->smi_ao_base))
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	 Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, yong.wu@mediatek.com,
	yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, anan.sun@mediatek.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 04/21] memory: mtk-smi: Use a struct for the platform data for smi-common
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:09:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1561774167-24141-5-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561774167-24141-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com>

Use a struct as the platform special data instead of the enumeration.

Also there is a minor change that moving the position of
"enum mtk_smi_gen" definition, this is because we expect define
"struct mtk_smi_common_plat" before it is referred.

This is a preparing patch for mt8183.

Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
index 9fd6b3d..8a2f968 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
@@ -49,6 +49,15 @@
 #define SMI_LARB_NONSEC_CON(id)	(0x380 + ((id) * 4))
 #define F_MMU_EN		BIT(0)
 
+enum mtk_smi_gen {
+	MTK_SMI_GEN1,
+	MTK_SMI_GEN2
+};
+
+struct mtk_smi_common_plat {
+	enum mtk_smi_gen gen;
+};
+
 struct mtk_smi_larb_gen {
 	bool need_larbid;
 	int port_in_larb[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX + 1];
@@ -61,6 +70,8 @@ struct mtk_smi {
 	struct clk			*clk_apb, *clk_smi;
 	struct clk			*clk_async; /*only needed by mt2701*/
 	void __iomem			*smi_ao_base;
+
+	const struct mtk_smi_common_plat *plat;
 };
 
 struct mtk_smi_larb { /* larb: local arbiter */
@@ -72,11 +83,6 @@ struct mtk_smi_larb { /* larb: local arbiter */
 	u32				*mmu;
 };
 
-enum mtk_smi_gen {
-	MTK_SMI_GEN1,
-	MTK_SMI_GEN2
-};
-
 static int mtk_smi_enable(const struct mtk_smi *smi)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -351,18 +357,26 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_gen1 = {
+	.gen = MTK_SMI_GEN1,
+};
+
+static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_gen2 = {
+	.gen = MTK_SMI_GEN2,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_smi_common_of_ids[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN2
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen2,
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN1
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen1,
 	},
 	{
 		.compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-smi-common",
-		.data = (void *)MTK_SMI_GEN2
+		.data = &mtk_smi_common_gen2,
 	},
 	{}
 };
@@ -372,13 +386,13 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct mtk_smi *common;
 	struct resource *res;
-	enum mtk_smi_gen smi_gen;
 	int ret;
 
 	common = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*common), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!common)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	common->dev = dev;
+	common->plat = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
 
 	common->clk_apb = devm_clk_get(dev, "apb");
 	if (IS_ERR(common->clk_apb))
@@ -394,8 +408,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * clock into emi clock domain, but for mtk smi gen2, there's no smi ao
 	 * base.
 	 */
-	smi_gen = (enum mtk_smi_gen)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
-	if (smi_gen == MTK_SMI_GEN1) {
+	if (common->plat->gen == MTK_SMI_GEN1) {
 		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 		common->smi_ao_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
 		if (IS_ERR(common->smi_ao_base))
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-29  2:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-29  2:09 [PATCH v8 00/21] MT8183 IOMMU SUPPORT Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` [PATCH v8 01/21] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add binding for mt8183 IOMMU and SMI Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` [PATCH v8 02/21] iommu/mediatek: Use a struct as the platform data Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` [PATCH v8 03/21] memory: mtk-smi: Use a general config_port interface Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` Yong Wu [this message]
2019-06-29  2:09   ` [PATCH v8 04/21] memory: mtk-smi: Use a struct for the platform data for smi-common Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` [PATCH v8 05/21] iommu/mediatek: Fix iova_to_phys PA start for 4GB mode Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` [PATCH v8 06/21] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Add paddr_to_iopte and iopte_to_paddr helpers Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` [PATCH v8 07/21] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Extend MediaTek 4GB Mode Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-07-10 14:36   ` Will Deacon
2019-07-10 14:36     ` Will Deacon
2019-07-10 14:36     ` Will Deacon
2019-07-11 11:53     ` Yong Wu
2019-07-11 11:53       ` Yong Wu
2019-07-11 11:53       ` Yong Wu
2019-07-11 11:53       ` Yong Wu
2019-07-11 12:31       ` Will Deacon
2019-07-11 12:31         ` Will Deacon
2019-07-11 12:31         ` Will Deacon
2019-07-14  4:41         ` Yong Wu
2019-07-14  4:41           ` Yong Wu
2019-07-14  4:41           ` Yong Wu
2019-07-14  4:41           ` Yong Wu
2019-07-15  9:51           ` Will Deacon
2019-07-15  9:51             ` Will Deacon
2019-07-15  9:51             ` Will Deacon
2019-07-15  9:51             ` Will Deacon
2019-07-17 12:44             ` Yong Wu
2019-07-17 12:44               ` Yong Wu
2019-07-17 12:44               ` Yong Wu
2019-07-17 12:44               ` Yong Wu
2019-07-17 14:23               ` Will Deacon
2019-07-17 14:23                 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-17 14:23                 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-18  5:37                 ` Yong Wu
2019-07-18  5:37                   ` Yong Wu
2019-07-18  5:37                   ` Yong Wu
2019-07-18  5:37                   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` [PATCH v8 08/21] iommu/mediatek: Add bclk can be supported optionally Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09 ` [PATCH v8 09/21] iommu/mediatek: Add larb-id remapped support Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu
2019-06-29  2:09   ` Yong Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1561774167-24141-5-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --to=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=anan.sun@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tfiga@google.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.