All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, raven@themaw.net,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/10] pipe: Conditionalise wakeup in pipe_read() [ver #2]
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 21:18:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157186189069.3995.10292601951655075484.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157186182463.3995.13922458878706311997.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Only do a wakeup in pipe_read() if we made space in a completely full
buffer.  The producer shouldn't be waiting on pipe->wait otherwise.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 fs/pipe.c |   15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 1274305772fb..e3a8f10750c9 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -327,11 +327,13 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 				spin_lock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
 				tail++;
 				pipe_commit_read(pipe, tail);
-				do_wakeup = 0;
-				wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked(
-					&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
+				do_wakeup = 1;
+				if (head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage)
+					wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked(
+						&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
 				spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
-				kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
+				if (head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage)
+					kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
 			}
 			total_len -= chars;
 			if (!total_len)
@@ -360,11 +362,6 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 				ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
 			break;
 		}
-		if (do_wakeup) {
-			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
- 			kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
-			do_wakeup = 0;
-		}
 		pipe_wait(pipe);
 	}
 	__pipe_unlock(pipe);


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, raven@themaw.net,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>dhowells@redhat.com,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/10] pipe: Conditionalise wakeup in pipe_read() [ver #2]
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 20:18:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157186189069.3995.10292601951655075484.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157186182463.3995.13922458878706311997.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Only do a wakeup in pipe_read() if we made space in a completely full
buffer.  The producer shouldn't be waiting on pipe->wait otherwise.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 fs/pipe.c |   15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 1274305772fb..e3a8f10750c9 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -327,11 +327,13 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 				spin_lock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
 				tail++;
 				pipe_commit_read(pipe, tail);
-				do_wakeup = 0;
-				wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked(
-					&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
+				do_wakeup = 1;
+				if (head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage)
+					wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked(
+						&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
 				spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
-				kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
+				if (head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage)
+					kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
 			}
 			total_len -= chars;
 			if (!total_len)
@@ -360,11 +362,6 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 				ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
 			break;
 		}
-		if (do_wakeup) {
-			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
- 			kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
-			do_wakeup = 0;
-		}
 		pipe_wait(pipe);
 	}
 	__pipe_unlock(pipe);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, raven@themaw.net,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>dhowells@redhat.com,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.orglinux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/10] pipe: Conditionalise wakeup in pipe_read() [ver #2]
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 21:18:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157186189069.3995.10292601951655075484.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157186182463.3995.13922458878706311997.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Only do a wakeup in pipe_read() if we made space in a completely full
buffer.  The producer shouldn't be waiting on pipe->wait otherwise.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 fs/pipe.c |   15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 1274305772fb..e3a8f10750c9 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -327,11 +327,13 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 				spin_lock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
 				tail++;
 				pipe_commit_read(pipe, tail);
-				do_wakeup = 0;
-				wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked(
-					&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
+				do_wakeup = 1;
+				if (head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage)
+					wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked(
+						&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
 				spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
-				kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
+				if (head - (tail - 1) == pipe->max_usage)
+					kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
 			}
 			total_len -= chars;
 			if (!total_len)
@@ -360,11 +362,6 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 				ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
 			break;
 		}
-		if (do_wakeup) {
-			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
- 			kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
-			do_wakeup = 0;
-		}
 		pipe_wait(pipe);
 	}
 	__pipe_unlock(pipe);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-23 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-23 20:17 [RFC PATCH 00/10] pipe: Notification queue preparation [ver #2] David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] pipe: Reduce #inclusion of pipe_fs_i.h " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] Remove the nr_exclusive argument from __wake_up_sync_key() " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] Add wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked() " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring, not cursor and length " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17   ` David Howells
2019-10-26  0:29   ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-26  0:50   ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-26 14:58   ` [pipe] 6567a02d20: BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address kernel test robot
2019-10-26 14:58     ` kernel test robot
2019-10-26 14:58     ` kernel test robot
2019-10-27 14:03   ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring, not cursor and length [ver #2] Linus Torvalds
2019-10-27 14:03     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-30 16:19   ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-10-30 16:19     ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-10-30 20:35     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-30 20:35       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-30 22:16       ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-10-30 22:16         ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-10-30 22:38         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-30 22:38           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-31 15:11     ` David Howells
2019-10-31 15:57       ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-10-31 15:57         ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-11-01 14:53       ` David Howells
2019-10-31 14:57   ` David Howells
2019-11-03 11:17     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-11-03 11:17       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-06 21:47   ` Johannes Hirte
2019-12-06 21:47     ` Johannes Hirte
2019-12-06 22:14     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-06 22:14       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-07  0:00       ` Johannes Hirte
2019-12-07  0:00         ` Johannes Hirte
2019-12-07  1:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-07  1:03           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-08 17:56           ` Johannes Hirte
2019-12-08 17:56             ` Johannes Hirte
2019-12-08 18:10             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-08 18:10               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-07  6:47         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-07  6:47           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-06 22:15   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] pipe: Allow pipes to have kernel-reserved slots " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:17   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] pipe: Advance tail pointer inside of wait spinlock in pipe_read() " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18 ` David Howells [this message]
2019-10-23 20:18   ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] pipe: Conditionalise wakeup " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18   ` David Howells
2019-10-27 15:57   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-10-27 15:57     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-10-31 15:21   ` David Howells
2019-10-31 16:38   ` David Howells
2019-11-03 11:04     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-11-03 11:04       ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-10-23 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] pipe: Rearrange sequence in pipe_write() to preallocate slot " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] pipe: Remove redundant wakeup from pipe_write() " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] pipe: Check for ring full inside of the spinlock in " David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18   ` David Howells
2019-10-23 20:18   ` David Howells
2019-10-24 10:32 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring, not cursor and length " David Howells
2019-10-24 10:32   ` David Howells
2019-10-24 13:14 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] pipe: Notification queue preparation " Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-24 13:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-24 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH 11/10] pipe: Add fsync() support " David Howells
2019-10-24 16:57   ` David Howells
2019-10-24 21:29   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-24 21:29     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-10-25  8:34   ` David Howells
2019-10-25  8:34     ` David Howells
2019-10-27 15:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-27 15:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-27 16:04   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-10-27 16:04     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-10-31 15:13   ` David Howells
2019-10-31 15:15   ` David Howells
2019-11-02 18:53     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 18:53       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 19:34     ` David Howells
2019-11-02 20:31       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-02 20:31         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-02 22:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 22:03           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 22:09           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 22:09             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 22:30           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-02 22:30             ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-02 23:02             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 23:02               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 23:09               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 23:09                 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-02 23:14                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-02 23:14                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-03 12:02                   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-11-03 12:02                     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=157186189069.3995.10292601951655075484.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.