All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH, v4] irq / PM: Fix IRQF_NO_SUSPEND problem with shared interrupts
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:28:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1574820.JRmxKN4N9f@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4823828.8eNZIeQFq1@vostro.rjw.lan>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since __disable_irq() only checks IRQF_NO_SUSPEND for the first
irqaction in a given irq_desc, that value of that bit for the
first irqaction affects all of the other irqactions sharing the
interrupt with it.  This is problematic in two cases.

First, if IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is set in the first irqaction and unset
in at least one of the other irqactions sharing the same interrupt,
the interrupt handlers in the other irqactions with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
unset will be invoked after suspend_device_irqs() has returned even
though they are not supposed to.  That shouldn't be a problem if
those interrupt handlers are implemented correctly and the
corresponding devices are properly suspended, but it may lead to
functional issues otherwise.

Second, if IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is unset in the first irqaction and set
in at least one of the other irqactions sharing the same interrupt,
the interrupt handlers in the other irqactions with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
set will not be invoked after suspend_device_irqs() has returned, but
they are supposed to be invoked then.  That may be a problem if the
corresponding devices are wakeup devices or if their interrupts have
to be properly handled during system suspend/resume too for other
reasons, which is the case for timer interrupts or the ACPI SCI for
example.

To address this, modify the handling of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND by
suspend_device_irqs() and resume_device_irqs() and make
note_interrupt() handle suspended interrupts.

First of all, make suspend_device_irqs() check IRQF_NO_SUSPEND for
all irqactions sharing the same irq_desc and avoid disabling the IRQ
if at least one of them has IRQF_NO_SUSPEND set.  If that flag is
also unset for at least one irqaction in the given irq_desc, however,
suspend_device_irqs() will move the irqactions with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
unset over to a list of "suspended actions" whose interrupt handlers
won't be invoked going forward.

Second, modify note_interrupt() to disable misbehaving IRQs faster if
spuroius interrupts occur during system suspend/resume (that is, for
an irq_desc with IRQS_SUSPENDED set).

Finally, make resume_device_irqs() move irqactions from the list of
"suspended actions" created by suspend_device_irqs() back to the
regular "action" list.  It also will clear the IRQS_SPURIOUS_DISABLED
flag for IRQS_SUSPENDED IRQs that were emergency disabled after
suspend_device_irqs() had returned and will log warning messages for
them.

This should address the problematic case (when IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is set
for at least one and unset for at least one irqaction sharing one
irq_desc) and that case only without changing behavior in any other
cases.

It also effectively reverts a previous change to refuse interrupt
requests with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND settings that do not match the
existing ones (as it is not needed any more) and a previous change
that added a IRQD_WAKEUP_STATE check to __disable_irqs() (as that
mechanism has the same problem with shared interrupts as described
above).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

I'm not sure why I make suspend_irq() and resume_irq() return bool
instead of just calling __disable_irq() and __enable_irq() from them
directly in the previous version.  Do it better this time.

Rafael

---
 include/linux/irqdesc.h |    2 +
 kernel/irq/internals.h  |    4 +-
 kernel/irq/manage.c     |   31 +++---------------
 kernel/irq/pm.c         |   80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/irq/spurious.c   |   14 +++++++-
 5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/kernel/irq/manage.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -382,15 +382,8 @@ setup_affinity(unsigned int irq, struct
 }
 #endif
 
-void __disable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, bool suspend)
+void __disable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq)
 {
-	if (suspend) {
-		if (!desc->action || (desc->action->flags & IRQF_NO_SUSPEND)
-		    || irqd_has_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_WAKEUP_STATE))
-			return;
-		desc->istate |= IRQS_SUSPENDED;
-	}
-
 	if (!desc->depth++)
 		irq_disable(desc);
 }
@@ -402,7 +395,7 @@ static int __disable_irq_nosync(unsigned
 
 	if (!desc)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	__disable_irq(desc, irq, false);
+	__disable_irq(desc, irq);
 	irq_put_desc_busunlock(desc, flags);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -443,20 +436,8 @@ void disable_irq(unsigned int irq)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(disable_irq);
 
-void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, bool resume)
+void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq)
 {
-	if (resume) {
-		if (!(desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED)) {
-			if (!desc->action)
-				return;
-			if (!(desc->action->flags & IRQF_FORCE_RESUME))
-				return;
-			/* Pretend that it got disabled ! */
-			desc->depth++;
-		}
-		desc->istate &= ~IRQS_SUSPENDED;
-	}
-
 	switch (desc->depth) {
 	case 0:
  err_out:
@@ -498,7 +479,7 @@ void enable_irq(unsigned int irq)
 		 KERN_ERR "enable_irq before setup/request_irq: irq %u\n", irq))
 		goto out;
 
-	__enable_irq(desc, irq, false);
+	__enable_irq(desc, irq);
 out:
 	irq_put_desc_busunlock(desc, flags);
 }
@@ -1079,7 +1060,7 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq
 		 */
 
 #define IRQF_MISMATCH \
-	(IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK | IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND)
+	(IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK | IRQF_ONESHOT)
 
 		if (!((old->flags & new->flags) & IRQF_SHARED) ||
 		    ((old->flags ^ new->flags) & IRQF_MISMATCH))
@@ -1232,7 +1213,7 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq
 	 */
 	if (shared && (desc->istate & IRQS_SPURIOUS_DISABLED)) {
 		desc->istate &= ~IRQS_SPURIOUS_DISABLED;
-		__enable_irq(desc, irq, false);
+		__enable_irq(desc, irq);
 	}
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
Index: linux-pm/kernel/irq/spurious.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -391,10 +391,20 @@ void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, st
 		 * otherwise the counter becomes a doomsday timer for otherwise
 		 * working systems
 		 */
-		if (time_after(jiffies, desc->last_unhandled + HZ/10))
+		if (time_after(jiffies, desc->last_unhandled + HZ/10)) {
 			desc->irqs_unhandled = 1;
-		else
+		} else {
 			desc->irqs_unhandled++;
+			if (unlikely(desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED)) {
+				/*
+				 * That shouldn't happen.  It means IRQs from
+				 * a device that is supposed to be suspended at
+				 * this point.  Decay faster.
+				 */
+				desc->irqs_unhandled += 999;
+				desc->irq_count += 999;
+			}
+		}
 		desc->last_unhandled = jiffies;
 	}
 
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/irqdesc.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/irqdesc.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/irqdesc.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct irq_desc;
  * @handle_irq:		highlevel irq-events handler
  * @preflow_handler:	handler called before the flow handler (currently used by sparc)
  * @action:		the irq action chain
+ * @action_suspended:	suspended irq action chain
  * @status:		status information
  * @core_internal_state__do_not_mess_with_it: core internal status information
  * @depth:		disable-depth, for nested irq_disable() calls
@@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ struct irq_desc {
 	irq_preflow_handler_t	preflow_handler;
 #endif
 	struct irqaction	*action;	/* IRQ action list */
+	struct irqaction	*action_suspended;
 	unsigned int		status_use_accessors;
 	unsigned int		core_internal_state__do_not_mess_with_it;
 	unsigned int		depth;		/* nested irq disables */
Index: linux-pm/kernel/irq/internals.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/irq/internals.h
+++ linux-pm/kernel/irq/internals.h
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ enum {
 
 extern int __irq_set_trigger(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq,
 		unsigned long flags);
-extern void __disable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, bool susp);
-extern void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, bool resume);
+extern void __disable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq);
+extern void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq);
 
 extern int irq_startup(struct irq_desc *desc, bool resend);
 extern void irq_shutdown(struct irq_desc *desc);
Index: linux-pm/kernel/irq/pm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/irq/pm.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/irq/pm.c
@@ -13,6 +13,47 @@
 
 #include "internals.h"
 
+static void suspend_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, int irq)
+{
+	struct irqaction *action = desc->action;
+	unsigned int no_suspend, flags;
+
+	if (!action)
+		return;
+
+	no_suspend = IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
+	flags = 0;
+	do {
+		no_suspend &= action->flags;
+		flags |= action->flags;
+		action = action->next;
+	} while (action);
+	if (no_suspend)
+		return;
+
+	desc->istate |= IRQS_SUSPENDED;
+
+	if ((flags & IRQF_NO_SUSPEND) &&
+	    !(desc->istate & IRQS_SPURIOUS_DISABLED)) {
+		struct irqaction *no_suspend = NULL;
+
+		do {
+			action = desc->action;
+			desc->action = action->next;
+			if (action->flags & IRQF_NO_SUSPEND) {
+				action->next = no_suspend;
+				no_suspend = action;
+			} else {
+				action->next = desc->action_suspended;
+				desc->action_suspended = action;
+			}
+		} while (desc->action);
+		desc->action = no_suspend;
+		return;
+	}
+	__disable_irq(desc, irq);
+}
+
 /**
  * suspend_device_irqs - disable all currently enabled interrupt lines
  *
@@ -30,7 +71,7 @@ void suspend_device_irqs(void)
 		unsigned long flags;
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
-		__disable_irq(desc, irq, true);
+		suspend_irq(desc, irq);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 	}
 
@@ -40,6 +81,41 @@ void suspend_device_irqs(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(suspend_device_irqs);
 
+static void resume_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, int irq)
+{
+	if (desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED) {
+		desc->istate &= ~IRQS_SUSPENDED;
+		if (desc->action_suspended) {
+			struct irqaction *action;
+
+			do {
+				action = desc->action_suspended;
+				desc->action_suspended = action->next;
+				action->next = desc->action;
+				desc->action = action;
+			} while (desc->action_suspended);
+
+			if (desc->istate & IRQS_SPURIOUS_DISABLED) {
+				pr_err("Re-enabling emergency disabled IRQ %d\n",
+				       irq);
+				desc->istate &= ~IRQS_SPURIOUS_DISABLED;
+			} else {
+				return;
+			}
+		}
+	} else {
+		if (!desc->action)
+			return;
+
+		if (!(desc->action->flags & IRQF_FORCE_RESUME))
+			return;
+
+		/* Pretend that it got disabled ! */
+		desc->depth++;
+	}
+	__enable_irq(desc, irq);
+}
+
 static void resume_irqs(bool want_early)
 {
 	struct irq_desc *desc;
@@ -54,7 +130,7 @@ static void resume_irqs(bool want_early)
 			continue;
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
-		__enable_irq(desc, irq, true);
+		resume_irq(desc, irq);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 	}
 }


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-29  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-24 21:26 [RFC][PATCH] irq: Rework IRQF_NO_SUSPENDED Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-24 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-24 23:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-25  5:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 19:20     ` Brian Norris
2014-07-29 19:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 20:41         ` Brian Norris
2014-07-25  9:27   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-25 12:49     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-25 13:55       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-25  9:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-25 12:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-25 13:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-25 17:03       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-25 16:58         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-25 21:00         ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-25 22:25           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-25 23:07             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-26 11:49             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-26 11:53               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-28  6:49               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 12:33                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-28 13:04                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 21:53                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-28 23:01                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-29 12:46                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-29 13:33                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-30 21:46                           ` [PATCH 0/3] irq / PM: wakeup interrupt interface for drivers (was: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: Rework IRQF_NO_SUSPENDED) Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-30 21:51                             ` [PATCH 1/3] irq / PM: New driver interface for wakeup interrupts Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-30 22:56                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-31  0:12                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-31  2:14                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 10:44                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-31 18:36                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 20:12                                         ` Alan Stern
2014-07-31 20:12                                           ` Alan Stern
2014-07-31 21:04                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 23:41                                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-08-01  0:51                                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-01 14:41                                               ` Alan Stern
2014-08-01 14:41                                                 ` Alan Stern
2014-07-31 22:16                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-08-01  0:08                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-01  1:24                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-01  9:40                                             ` [PATCH 1/3] irq / PM: New driver interface for wakeup interruptsn Thomas Gleixner
2014-08-01 13:45                                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-01 13:43                                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-08-01 14:29                                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-02  1:31                                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-03 13:42                                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-04  3:38                                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-05 15:22                                                     ` [PATCH 0/5] irq / PM: Shared IRQs vs IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and suspend-to-idle wakeup Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-05 15:24                                                       ` [PATCH 1/5] PM / sleep: Mechanism for aborting system suspends unconditionally Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-05 23:29                                                         ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-05 15:25                                                       ` [PATCH 2/5] irq / PM: Fix IRQF_NO_SUSPEND problem with shared interrupts Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-05 15:26                                                       ` [PATCH 3/5] irq / PM: Make wakeup interrupts wake up from suspend-to-idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-08  1:58                                                         ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-09  0:28                                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-05 15:27                                                       ` [PATCH 4/5] x86 / PM: Set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for IOAPIC IRQ chip objects Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-05 15:28                                                       ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI / PM: Make PCIe PME interrupts wake up from suspend-to-idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-05 16:12                                                       ` [PATCH 0/5] irq / PM: Shared IRQs vs IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and suspend-to-idle wakeup Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08  2:09                                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 22:54                                         ` [PATCH 1/3] irq / PM: New driver interface for wakeup interrupts Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-30 21:51                             ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI / PM: Make PCIe PME interrupts wake up from "freeze" sleep state Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-30 21:52                             ` [PATCH 3/3] gpio-keys / PM: use enable/disable_device_irq_wake() Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-28 21:27                 ` [RFC][PATCH] irq: Rework IRQF_NO_SUSPENDED Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-27 15:53             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-27 22:00               ` [PATCH, v2] Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-28 12:11                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-28 21:17                   ` [PATCH, v3] irq / PM: Fix IRQF_NO_SUSPEND problem with shared interrupts (was: Re: [PATCH, v2]) Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-29  7:28                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-07-29 13:46                       ` [PATCH, v5] irq / PM: Fix IRQF_NO_SUSPEND problem with shared interrupts Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-30  0:54                         ` [PATCH, v6] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-25 12:47   ` [RFC][PATCH] irq: Rework IRQF_NO_SUSPENDED Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-25 13:22     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1574820.JRmxKN4N9f@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.