All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, raven@themaw.net,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/14] pipe: Add O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE [ver #3]
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:31:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157909507195.20155.11337528682255354415.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157909503552.20155.3030058841911628518.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Add an O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE flag that can be passed to pipe2() to indicate
that the pipe being created is going to be used for notifications.  This
suppresses the use of splice(), vmsplice(), tee() and sendfile() on the
pipe as calling iov_iter_revert() on a pipe when a kernel notification
message has been inserted into the middle of a multi-buffer splice will be
messy.

The flag is given the same value as O_EXCL as it seems unlikely that
this flag will ever be applicable to pipes and I don't want to use up
another O_* bit unnecessarily.  An alternative could be to add a pipe3()
system call.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h b/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h
index 5f3d21e8a34b..9df72227f515 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
 #define _UAPI_LINUX_WATCH_QUEUE_H
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/fcntl.h>
+
+#define O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE	O_EXCL	/* Parameter to pipe2() selecting notification pipe */
 
 enum watch_notification_type {
 	WATCH_TYPE_META		= 0,	/* Special record */


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, raven@themaw.net,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>dhowells@redhat.com,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/14] pipe: Add O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE [ver #3]
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:31:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157909507195.20155.11337528682255354415.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157909503552.20155.3030058841911628518.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Add an O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE flag that can be passed to pipe2() to indicate
that the pipe being created is going to be used for notifications.  This
suppresses the use of splice(), vmsplice(), tee() and sendfile() on the
pipe as calling iov_iter_revert() on a pipe when a kernel notification
message has been inserted into the middle of a multi-buffer splice will be
messy.

The flag is given the same value as O_EXCL as it seems unlikely that
this flag will ever be applicable to pipes and I don't want to use up
another O_* bit unnecessarily.  An alternative could be to add a pipe3()
system call.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h b/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h
index 5f3d21e8a34b..9df72227f515 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
 #define _UAPI_LINUX_WATCH_QUEUE_H
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/fcntl.h>
+
+#define O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE	O_EXCL	/* Parameter to pipe2() selecting notification pipe */
 
 enum watch_notification_type {
 	WATCH_TYPE_META		= 0,	/* Special record */

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, raven@themaw.net,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>dhowells@redhat.com,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.orglinux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/14] pipe: Add O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE [ver #3]
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:31:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157909507195.20155.11337528682255354415.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157909503552.20155.3030058841911628518.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Add an O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE flag that can be passed to pipe2() to indicate
that the pipe being created is going to be used for notifications.  This
suppresses the use of splice(), vmsplice(), tee() and sendfile() on the
pipe as calling iov_iter_revert() on a pipe when a kernel notification
message has been inserted into the middle of a multi-buffer splice will be
messy.

The flag is given the same value as O_EXCL as it seems unlikely that
this flag will ever be applicable to pipes and I don't want to use up
another O_* bit unnecessarily.  An alternative could be to add a pipe3()
system call.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h b/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h
index 5f3d21e8a34b..9df72227f515 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/watch_queue.h
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
 #define _UAPI_LINUX_WATCH_QUEUE_H
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/fcntl.h>
+
+#define O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE	O_EXCL	/* Parameter to pipe2() selecting notification pipe */
 
 enum watch_notification_type {
 	WATCH_TYPE_META		= 0,	/* Special record */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-15 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-15 13:30 [RFC PATCH 00/14] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB notifications [ver #3] David Howells
2020-01-15 13:30 ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:30 ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] uapi: General notification queue definitions " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:30   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:30   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] security: Add hooks to rule on setting a watch " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:30   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:30   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] security: Add a hook for the point of notification insertion " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31 ` David Howells [this message]
2020-01-15 13:31   ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] pipe: Add O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] pipe: Add general notification queue support " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] keys: Add a notification facility " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] Add sample notification program " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-26 15:47   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-01-26 15:47     ` Guenter Roeck
2020-01-26 15:47     ` Guenter Roeck
2020-01-15 13:31 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] pipe: Allow buffers to be marked read-whole-or-error for notifications " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] pipe: Add notification lossage handling " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:31   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] Add a general, global device notification watch list " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32 ` [RFC PATCH 11/14] block: Add block layer notifications " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] usb: Add USB subsystem " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] selinux: Implement the watch_key security hook " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] smack: Implement the watch_key and post_notification hooks " David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 13:32   ` David Howells
2020-01-15 20:10 ` [RFC PATCH 00/14] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB notifications " Linus Torvalds
2020-01-15 20:10   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-11  0:56   ` Andres Freund
2020-02-11  0:56     ` Andres Freund
2020-01-15 21:07 ` David Howells
2020-01-15 21:07   ` David Howells
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-11-07 13:35 [RFC PATCH 00/14] pipe: Keyrings, Block and USB notifications [ver #2] David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35 ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35 ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] uapi: General notification queue definitions " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] security: Add hooks to rule on setting a watch " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] security: Add a hook for the point of notification insertion " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] pipe: Add O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:35   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 18:16   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-07 18:16     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-07 18:48   ` David Howells
2019-11-08  5:06     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-08  5:06       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-08  6:42     ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] pipe: Add general notification queue support " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] keys: Add a notification facility " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] Add sample notification program " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] pipe: Allow buffers to be marked read-whole-or-error for notifications " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 18:15   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-07 18:15     ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] pipe: Allow buffers to be marked read-whole-or-error for notifications [ver #2 Andy Lutomirski
2019-11-07 18:23   ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] pipe: Allow buffers to be marked read-whole-or-error for notifications [ver #2] David Howells
2019-11-07 18:23     ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] pipe: Allow buffers to be marked read-whole-or-error for notifications [ver #2 David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] pipe: Add notification lossage handling [ver #2] David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] Add a general, global device notification watch list " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:36   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 11/14] block: Add block layer notifications " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] usb: Add USB subsystem " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] selinux: Implement the watch_key security hook " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] smack: Implement the watch_key and post_notification hooks " David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 13:37   ` David Howells
2019-11-07 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] pipe: Add general notification queue support " David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=157909507195.20155.11337528682255354415.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.