All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>,
	Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwi@redhat.com>,
	Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] boot aggregate test
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:26:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1585175177-20739-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

The "boot_aggregate" contained in the IMA measurement list has always been
a SHA1 hash.  With Roberto's "ima: support stronger algorithms for
attestation" patch set, the hash algorithm used to calculate the
"boot_aggregate" will either be the IMA default hash algorithm or fall
back to using SHA1 for TPM 1.2 or SHA256 for TPM 2.0, assuming a SHA256
TPM bank exists.

This test may be used to verify the "boot_aggregate" based on a physical
TPM or a software TPM.  If a software TPM is not running on the system,
one is started and initialized by walking a sample
binary_bios_measurements log and extending the software TPM with those
values.  The "boot_aggregate" is then calculated and compared against the
sample ascii_runtime_measurements record.

This test depends on Vitaly's "ima-evm-utils: Add some tests for evmctl"
patch being upstreamed.  I would appreciate some review on both his patch
and on this patch set.  To help facilitate this review, I've pushed out a
next-testing topic branch.  Included in this topic branch is Patrick
Uiterwijk's support for reading the TPM PCRs using Intel's TSS2.

Thanks!

Mimi

Mimi Zohar (3):
  ima-evm-utils: tests: verify boot_aggregate
  ima-evm-utils: tests: verify the last "boot_aggregate" record
  ima_evm_utils: tests: color boot_aggregate.test tty output

 tests/Makefile.am                     |   2 +-
 tests/boot_aggregate.test             | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/test_ascii_runtime_measurements |   3 +
 tests/test_binary_bios_measurements   | Bin 0 -> 23248 bytes
 4 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100755 tests/boot_aggregate.test
 create mode 100644 tests/test_ascii_runtime_measurements
 create mode 100644 tests/test_binary_bios_measurements

-- 
2.7.5


             reply	other threads:[~2020-03-25 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-25 22:26 Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-03-25 22:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] ima-evm-utils: tests: verify boot_aggregate Mimi Zohar
2020-03-25 22:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] ima-evm-utils: tests: verify the last "boot_aggregate" record Mimi Zohar
2020-03-25 22:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ima_evm_utils: tests: color boot_aggregate.test tty output Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1585175177-20739-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=puiterwi@redhat.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=vt@altlinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.