All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64: Optimize ptrauth by enabling it for non-leaf functions
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:06:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1588149371-20310-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> (raw)

Compilers are optimized to not create the frame record for the leaf
function and hence lr is not signed and stored in the stack. Thus the leaf
functions cannot be used for ROP gadget attack.

This patch selects pointer authentication only for non-leaf function
and the compiler option is modified to -mbranch-protection=pac-ret and
-msign-return-address=non-leaf.

As there are no PAC instructions(PACIASP and AUTIASP) inserted in the leaf
functions so the kernel code size reduces by ~0.01%.

Note, As PACIASP instruction is also used for Armv8.5 BTI branching so the
compiler may insert BTI instructions in case of leaf functions which are
candidate of JOP gadget for the upcoming BTI in-kernel support.

Reported-by: Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
Changes since v1:
* Updated the commit logs as per the comments from Will and Mark[1].

[1]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg798518.html


 arch/arm64/Kconfig  | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/Makefile | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 40fb05d..29cfe05 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -1541,11 +1541,11 @@ config ARM64_PTR_AUTH
 
 config CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET
 	# GCC 9 or later, clang 8 or later
-	def_bool $(cc-option,-mbranch-protection=pac-ret+leaf)
+	def_bool $(cc-option,-mbranch-protection=pac-ret)
 
 config CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS
 	# GCC 7, 8
-	def_bool $(cc-option,-msign-return-address=all)
+	def_bool $(cc-option,-msign-return-address=non-leaf)
 
 config AS_HAS_PAC
 	def_bool $(as-option,-Wa$(comma)-march=armv8.3-a)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
index 85e4149..895f506 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ endif
 branch-prot-flags-y += $(call cc-option,-mbranch-protection=none)
 
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH),y)
-branch-prot-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS) := -msign-return-address=all
-branch-prot-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET) := -mbranch-protection=pac-ret+leaf
+branch-prot-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS) := -msign-return-address=non-leaf
+branch-prot-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET) := -mbranch-protection=pac-ret
 # -march=armv8.3-a enables the non-nops instructions for PAC, to avoid the
 # compiler to generate them and consequently to break the single image contract
 # we pass it only to the assembler. This option is utilized only in case of non
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2020-04-29  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-29  8:36 Amit Daniel Kachhap [this message]
2020-04-29 10:18 ` [PATCH v2] arm64: Optimize ptrauth by enabling it for non-leaf functions Mark Rutland
2020-04-29 16:01   ` Amit Kachhap
2020-04-30 11:00   ` Amit Kachhap
2020-04-30 11:05     ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1588149371-20310-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --to=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.kiss@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.