From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] arm64/cpuinfo: Move device_initcall() near cpuinfo_regs_init() Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 17:59:37 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1588595377-4503-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw) This moves device_initcall() near cpuinfo_regs_init() making the calling sequence clear. Besides it is a standard practice to have device_initcall() (any __initcall for that matter) just after the function it actually calls. Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> --- Based on 5.7-rc4 arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c index 86136075ae41..a515d8f3639e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c @@ -311,6 +311,8 @@ static int __init cpuinfo_regs_init(void) } return 0; } +device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init); + static void cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info) { unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); @@ -403,5 +405,3 @@ void __init cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu(void) boot_cpu_data = *info; init_cpu_features(&boot_cpu_data); } - -device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init); -- 2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH] arm64/cpuinfo: Move device_initcall() near cpuinfo_regs_init() Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 17:59:37 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1588595377-4503-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw) This moves device_initcall() near cpuinfo_regs_init() making the calling sequence clear. Besides it is a standard practice to have device_initcall() (any __initcall for that matter) just after the function it actually calls. Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> --- Based on 5.7-rc4 arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c index 86136075ae41..a515d8f3639e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c @@ -311,6 +311,8 @@ static int __init cpuinfo_regs_init(void) } return 0; } +device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init); + static void cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info) { unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); @@ -403,5 +405,3 @@ void __init cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu(void) boot_cpu_data = *info; init_cpu_features(&boot_cpu_data); } - -device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init); -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 12:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-05-04 12:29 Anshuman Khandual [this message] 2020-05-04 12:29 ` [PATCH] arm64/cpuinfo: Move device_initcall() near cpuinfo_regs_init() Anshuman Khandual 2020-05-04 12:43 ` Mark Rutland 2020-05-04 12:43 ` Mark Rutland 2020-05-04 21:04 ` Will Deacon 2020-05-04 21:04 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1588595377-4503-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \ --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.