All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 14/22] lnet: Force full discovery cycle
Date: Tue,  2 Jun 2020 20:59:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1591146001-27171-15-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1591146001-27171-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>

From: Amir Shehata <ashehata@whamcloud.com>

There are scenarios where there could be a discrepancy between
cached peer information and reality. In these cases what could
end-up happening is incomplete interface information might be
cached because one side determined that the peer didn't require
a PUSH. This will lead to undesired MR behavior, where not all
the interfaces are used for a period of time.

Therefore, it is safer to always force a full discovery cycle:
GET/PUSH to ensure both sides are up-to-date.

In the NMR case, when discovery is turned off, make sure to flag
discovery as complete to avoid stalling the state machine.

WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13477
Lustre-commit: 9bafd530d7858 ("LU-13477 lnet: Force full discovery cycle")
Signed-off-by: Amir Shehata <ashehata@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/38322
Reviewed-by: Chris Horn <chris.horn@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Serguei Smirnov <ssmirnov@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
---
 net/lnet/lnet/peer.c   | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 net/lnet/lnet/router.c |  5 +++--
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/lnet/lnet/peer.c b/net/lnet/lnet/peer.c
index 60749da..5869a20 100644
--- a/net/lnet/lnet/peer.c
+++ b/net/lnet/lnet/peer.c
@@ -1179,6 +1179,11 @@ struct lnet_peer_ni *
 	lp = lpni->lpni_peer_net->lpn_peer;
 
 	while (!lnet_peer_is_uptodate(lp)) {
+		spin_lock(&lp->lp_lock);
+		/* force a full discovery cycle */
+		lp->lp_state |= LNET_PEER_FORCE_PING | LNET_PEER_FORCE_PUSH;
+		spin_unlock(&lp->lp_lock);
+
 		rc = lnet_discover_peer_locked(lpni, cpt, true);
 		if (rc)
 			goto out_decref;
@@ -3043,6 +3048,19 @@ static int lnet_peer_push_failed(struct lnet_peer *lp)
 	return rc ? rc : LNET_REDISCOVER_PEER;
 }
 
+/* Mark the peer as discovered. */
+static int lnet_peer_discovered(struct lnet_peer *lp)
+__must_hold(&lp->lp_lock)
+{
+	lp->lp_state |= LNET_PEER_DISCOVERED;
+	lp->lp_state &= ~(LNET_PEER_DISCOVERING |
+			  LNET_PEER_REDISCOVER);
+
+	CDEBUG(D_NET, "peer %s\n", libcfs_nid2str(lp->lp_primary_nid));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* Active side of push. */
 static int lnet_peer_send_push(struct lnet_peer *lp)
 __must_hold(&lp->lp_lock)
@@ -3056,6 +3074,12 @@ static int lnet_peer_send_push(struct lnet_peer *lp)
 	/* Don't push to a non-multi-rail peer. */
 	if (!(lp->lp_state & LNET_PEER_MULTI_RAIL)) {
 		lp->lp_state &= ~LNET_PEER_FORCE_PUSH;
+		/* if peer's NIDs are uptodate then peer is discovered */
+		if (lp->lp_state & LNET_PEER_NIDS_UPTODATE) {
+			rc = lnet_peer_discovered(lp);
+			return rc;
+		}
+
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -3147,22 +3171,6 @@ static void lnet_peer_discovery_error(struct lnet_peer *lp, int error)
 }
 
 /*
- * Mark the peer as discovered.
- */
-static int lnet_peer_discovered(struct lnet_peer *lp)
-__must_hold(&lp->lp_lock)
-{
-	lp->lp_state |= LNET_PEER_DISCOVERED;
-	lp->lp_state &= ~(LNET_PEER_DISCOVERING |
-			  LNET_PEER_REDISCOVER);
-
-	CDEBUG(D_NET, "peer %s\n", libcfs_nid2str(lp->lp_primary_nid));
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-
-/*
  * Discovering this peer is taking too long. Cancel any Ping or Push
  * that discovery is waiting on by unlinking the relevant MDs. The
  * lnet_discovery_event_handler() will proceed from here and complete
diff --git a/net/lnet/lnet/router.c b/net/lnet/lnet/router.c
index af50e51..903d027 100644
--- a/net/lnet/lnet/router.c
+++ b/net/lnet/lnet/router.c
@@ -1154,9 +1154,10 @@ bool lnet_router_checker_active(void)
 			spin_unlock(&rtr->lp_lock);
 			continue;
 		}
-		/* make sure we actively discover the router */
+		/* make sure we fully discover the router */
 		rtr->lp_state &= ~LNET_PEER_NIDS_UPTODATE;
-		rtr->lp_state |= LNET_PEER_RTR_DISCOVERY;
+		rtr->lp_state |= LNET_PEER_FORCE_PING | LNET_PEER_FORCE_PUSH |
+				 LNET_PEER_RTR_DISCOVERY;
 		spin_unlock(&rtr->lp_lock);
 
 		/* find the peer_ni associated with the primary NID */
-- 
1.8.3.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-03  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-03  0:59 [lustre-devel] [PATCH 00/22] lustre: OpenSFS backport patches for May 29 2020 James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 01/22] lnet: libcfs: fix CPT handling for UP systems James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 02/22] lustre: use BIT() macro where appropriate in include James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 03/22] lustre: use BIT() macro where appropriate James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 04/22] lustre: ptlrpc: change LONG_UNLINK to PTLRPC_REQ_LONG_UNLINK James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 05/22] lustre: llite: use %pd to report dentry names James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 06/22] lnet: tidy lnet_discover and fix mem accounting bug James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 07/22] lustre: llite: prevent MAX_DIO_SIZE 32-bit truncation James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/22] lustre: llite: integrate statx() API with Lustre James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 09/22] lustre: ldlm: no current source if lu_ref_del not in same tsk James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 10/22] lnet: always pass struct lnet_md by reference James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 11/22] lustre: llite: fix read if readahead window smaller than rpc size James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 12/22] lustre: obdclass: bind zombie export cleanup workqueue James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 13/22] lnet: handle discovery off properly James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` James Simmons [this message]
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 15/22] lnet: set route aliveness properly James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 16/22] lnet: Correct the default LND timeout James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 17/22] lnet: Add lnet_lnd_timeout to sysfs James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 18/22] lnet: lnd: Allow independent ko2iblnd timeout James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 19/22] lnet: lnd: Allow independent socklnd timeout James Simmons
2020-06-03  0:59 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 20/22] lnet: lnd: gracefully handle unexpected events James Simmons
2020-06-03  1:00 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 21/22] lustre: update version to 2.13.54 James Simmons
2020-06-03  1:00 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 22/22] lnet: procs: print new line based on distro James Simmons

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1591146001-27171-15-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --to=jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.