All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dev@openvswitch.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, pshelar@ovn.org, jlelli@redhat.com,
	bigeasy@linutronix.de, i.maximets@ovn.org
Subject: [PATCH net v4] net: openvswitch: fix to make sure flow_lookup() is not preempted
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 20:24:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160295903253.7789.826736662555102345.stgit@ebuild> (raw)

The flow_lookup() function uses per CPU variables, which must be called
with BH disabled. However, this is fine in the general NAPI use case
where the local BH is disabled. But, it's also called from the netlink
context. The below patch makes sure that even in the netlink path, the
BH is disabled.

In addition, u64_stats_update_begin() requires a lock to ensure one writer
which is not ensured here. Making it per-CPU and disabling NAPI (softirq)
ensures that there is always only one writer.

Fixes: eac87c413bf9 ("net: openvswitch: reorder masks array based on usage")
Reported-by: Juri Lelli <jlelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
---
v2: - Add u64_stats_update_begin() sync point protection
    - Moved patch to net from net-next branch

v3: - Add comment to flow_lookup() call
    - Some update in code comments, and commit message

v4: - Rebase to latest net branch

 net/openvswitch/flow_table.c |   58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 net/openvswitch/flow_table.h |    8 ++++--
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index 87c286ad660e..f3486a37361a 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static struct table_instance *table_instance_alloc(int new_size)
 
 static void __mask_array_destroy(struct mask_array *ma)
 {
-	free_percpu(ma->masks_usage_cntr);
+	free_percpu(ma->masks_usage_stats);
 	kfree(ma);
 }
 
@@ -199,15 +199,15 @@ static void tbl_mask_array_reset_counters(struct mask_array *ma)
 		ma->masks_usage_zero_cntr[i] = 0;
 
 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-			u64 *usage_counters = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr,
-							  cpu);
+			struct mask_array_stats *stats;
 			unsigned int start;
 			u64 counter;
 
+			stats = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_stats, cpu);
 			do {
-				start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&ma->syncp);
-				counter = usage_counters[i];
-			} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&ma->syncp, start));
+				start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&stats->syncp);
+				counter = stats->usage_cntrs[i];
+			} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&stats->syncp, start));
 
 			ma->masks_usage_zero_cntr[i] += counter;
 		}
@@ -230,9 +230,10 @@ static struct mask_array *tbl_mask_array_alloc(int size)
 					     sizeof(struct sw_flow_mask *) *
 					     size);
 
-	new->masks_usage_cntr = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(u64) * size,
-					       __alignof__(u64));
-	if (!new->masks_usage_cntr) {
+	new->masks_usage_stats = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(struct mask_array_stats) +
+						sizeof(u64) * size,
+						__alignof__(u64));
+	if (!new->masks_usage_stats) {
 		kfree(new);
 		return NULL;
 	}
@@ -722,6 +723,8 @@ static struct sw_flow *masked_flow_lookup(struct table_instance *ti,
 
 /* Flow lookup does full lookup on flow table. It starts with
  * mask from index passed in *index.
+ * This function MUST be called with BH disabled due to the use
+ * of CPU specific variables.
  */
 static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
 				   struct table_instance *ti,
@@ -731,7 +734,7 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
 				   u32 *n_cache_hit,
 				   u32 *index)
 {
-	u64 *usage_counters = this_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr);
+	struct mask_array_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_stats);
 	struct sw_flow *flow;
 	struct sw_flow_mask *mask;
 	int i;
@@ -741,9 +744,9 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
 		if (mask) {
 			flow = masked_flow_lookup(ti, key, mask, n_mask_hit);
 			if (flow) {
-				u64_stats_update_begin(&ma->syncp);
-				usage_counters[*index]++;
-				u64_stats_update_end(&ma->syncp);
+				u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
+				stats->usage_cntrs[*index]++;
+				u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
 				(*n_cache_hit)++;
 				return flow;
 			}
@@ -762,9 +765,9 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
 		flow = masked_flow_lookup(ti, key, mask, n_mask_hit);
 		if (flow) { /* Found */
 			*index = i;
-			u64_stats_update_begin(&ma->syncp);
-			usage_counters[*index]++;
-			u64_stats_update_end(&ma->syncp);
+			u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
+			stats->usage_cntrs[*index]++;
+			u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
 			return flow;
 		}
 	}
@@ -850,9 +853,17 @@ struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_tbl_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
 	struct mask_array *ma = rcu_dereference_ovsl(tbl->mask_array);
 	u32 __always_unused n_mask_hit;
 	u32 __always_unused n_cache_hit;
+	struct sw_flow *flow;
 	u32 index = 0;
 
-	return flow_lookup(tbl, ti, ma, key, &n_mask_hit, &n_cache_hit, &index);
+	/* This function gets called trough the netlink interface and therefore
+	 * is preemptible. However, flow_lookup() function needs to be called
+	 * with BH disabled due to CPU specific variables.
+	 */
+	local_bh_disable();
+	flow = flow_lookup(tbl, ti, ma, key, &n_mask_hit, &n_cache_hit, &index);
+	local_bh_enable();
+	return flow;
 }
 
 struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_tbl_lookup_exact(struct flow_table *tbl,
@@ -1109,7 +1120,6 @@ void ovs_flow_masks_rebalance(struct flow_table *table)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ma->max; i++) {
 		struct sw_flow_mask *mask;
-		unsigned int start;
 		int cpu;
 
 		mask = rcu_dereference_ovsl(ma->masks[i]);
@@ -1120,14 +1130,16 @@ void ovs_flow_masks_rebalance(struct flow_table *table)
 		masks_and_count[i].counter = 0;
 
 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-			u64 *usage_counters = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr,
-							  cpu);
+			struct mask_array_stats *stats;
+			unsigned int start;
 			u64 counter;
 
+			stats = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_stats, cpu);
 			do {
-				start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&ma->syncp);
-				counter = usage_counters[i];
-			} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&ma->syncp, start));
+				start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&stats->syncp);
+				counter = stats->usage_cntrs[i];
+			} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&stats->syncp,
+							   start));
 
 			masks_and_count[i].counter += counter;
 		}
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h
index d8fb7a3a3dfd..9e659db78c05 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h
@@ -38,12 +38,16 @@ struct mask_count {
 	u64 counter;
 };
 
+struct mask_array_stats {
+	struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
+	u64 usage_cntrs[];
+};
+
 struct mask_array {
 	struct rcu_head rcu;
 	int count, max;
-	u64 __percpu *masks_usage_cntr;
+	struct mask_array_stats __percpu *masks_usage_stats;
 	u64 *masks_usage_zero_cntr;
-	struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
 	struct sw_flow_mask __rcu *masks[];
 };
 


             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-17 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-17 18:24 Eelco Chaudron [this message]
2020-10-18 19:42 ` [PATCH net v4] net: openvswitch: fix to make sure flow_lookup() is not preempted Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=160295903253.7789.826736662555102345.stgit@ebuild \
    --to=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=jlelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.