All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
	Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Subject: [PATCH] phy: uniphier-pcie: Fix updating phy parameters
Date: Mon,  7 Jun 2021 12:50:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1623037842-19363-1-git-send-email-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> (raw)

The current driver uses a value from register TEST_O as the original
value for register TEST_I, though, the value is overwritten by "param",
so there is a bug that the original value isn't no longer used.

The value of TEST_O[7:0] should be masked with "mask", replaced with
"param", and placed in the bitfield TESTI_DAT_MASK as new TEST_I value.

Fixes: c6d9b1324159 ("phy: socionext: add PCIe PHY driver support")
Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
---
 drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c
index e4adab3..6bdbd1f 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c
@@ -24,11 +24,13 @@
 #define PORT_SEL_1		FIELD_PREP(PORT_SEL_MASK, 1)
 
 #define PCL_PHY_TEST_I		0x2000
-#define PCL_PHY_TEST_O		0x2004
 #define TESTI_DAT_MASK		GENMASK(13, 6)
 #define TESTI_ADR_MASK		GENMASK(5, 1)
 #define TESTI_WR_EN		BIT(0)
 
+#define PCL_PHY_TEST_O		0x2004
+#define TESTO_DAT_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
+
 #define PCL_PHY_RESET		0x200c
 #define PCL_PHY_RESET_N_MNMODE	BIT(8)	/* =1:manual */
 #define PCL_PHY_RESET_N		BIT(0)	/* =1:deasssert */
@@ -77,11 +79,12 @@ static void uniphier_pciephy_set_param(struct uniphier_pciephy_priv *priv,
 	val  = FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, 1);
 	val |= FIELD_PREP(TESTI_ADR_MASK, reg);
 	uniphier_pciephy_testio_write(priv, val);
-	val = readl(priv->base + PCL_PHY_TEST_O);
+	val = readl(priv->base + PCL_PHY_TEST_O) & TESTO_DAT_MASK;
 
 	/* update value */
-	val &= ~FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, mask);
-	val  = FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, mask & param);
+	val &= ~mask;
+	val |= mask & param;
+	val = FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, val);
 	val |= FIELD_PREP(TESTI_ADR_MASK, reg);
 	uniphier_pciephy_testio_write(priv, val);
 	uniphier_pciephy_testio_write(priv, val | TESTI_WR_EN);
-- 
2.7.4


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
	Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Subject: [PATCH] phy: uniphier-pcie: Fix updating phy parameters
Date: Mon,  7 Jun 2021 12:50:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1623037842-19363-1-git-send-email-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> (raw)

The current driver uses a value from register TEST_O as the original
value for register TEST_I, though, the value is overwritten by "param",
so there is a bug that the original value isn't no longer used.

The value of TEST_O[7:0] should be masked with "mask", replaced with
"param", and placed in the bitfield TESTI_DAT_MASK as new TEST_I value.

Fixes: c6d9b1324159 ("phy: socionext: add PCIe PHY driver support")
Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
---
 drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c
index e4adab3..6bdbd1f 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c
@@ -24,11 +24,13 @@
 #define PORT_SEL_1		FIELD_PREP(PORT_SEL_MASK, 1)
 
 #define PCL_PHY_TEST_I		0x2000
-#define PCL_PHY_TEST_O		0x2004
 #define TESTI_DAT_MASK		GENMASK(13, 6)
 #define TESTI_ADR_MASK		GENMASK(5, 1)
 #define TESTI_WR_EN		BIT(0)
 
+#define PCL_PHY_TEST_O		0x2004
+#define TESTO_DAT_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
+
 #define PCL_PHY_RESET		0x200c
 #define PCL_PHY_RESET_N_MNMODE	BIT(8)	/* =1:manual */
 #define PCL_PHY_RESET_N		BIT(0)	/* =1:deasssert */
@@ -77,11 +79,12 @@ static void uniphier_pciephy_set_param(struct uniphier_pciephy_priv *priv,
 	val  = FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, 1);
 	val |= FIELD_PREP(TESTI_ADR_MASK, reg);
 	uniphier_pciephy_testio_write(priv, val);
-	val = readl(priv->base + PCL_PHY_TEST_O);
+	val = readl(priv->base + PCL_PHY_TEST_O) & TESTO_DAT_MASK;
 
 	/* update value */
-	val &= ~FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, mask);
-	val  = FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, mask & param);
+	val &= ~mask;
+	val |= mask & param;
+	val = FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, val);
 	val |= FIELD_PREP(TESTI_ADR_MASK, reg);
 	uniphier_pciephy_testio_write(priv, val);
 	uniphier_pciephy_testio_write(priv, val | TESTI_WR_EN);
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
	Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Subject: [PATCH] phy: uniphier-pcie: Fix updating phy parameters
Date: Mon,  7 Jun 2021 12:50:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1623037842-19363-1-git-send-email-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> (raw)

The current driver uses a value from register TEST_O as the original
value for register TEST_I, though, the value is overwritten by "param",
so there is a bug that the original value isn't no longer used.

The value of TEST_O[7:0] should be masked with "mask", replaced with
"param", and placed in the bitfield TESTI_DAT_MASK as new TEST_I value.

Fixes: c6d9b1324159 ("phy: socionext: add PCIe PHY driver support")
Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
---
 drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c
index e4adab3..6bdbd1f 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/socionext/phy-uniphier-pcie.c
@@ -24,11 +24,13 @@
 #define PORT_SEL_1		FIELD_PREP(PORT_SEL_MASK, 1)
 
 #define PCL_PHY_TEST_I		0x2000
-#define PCL_PHY_TEST_O		0x2004
 #define TESTI_DAT_MASK		GENMASK(13, 6)
 #define TESTI_ADR_MASK		GENMASK(5, 1)
 #define TESTI_WR_EN		BIT(0)
 
+#define PCL_PHY_TEST_O		0x2004
+#define TESTO_DAT_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
+
 #define PCL_PHY_RESET		0x200c
 #define PCL_PHY_RESET_N_MNMODE	BIT(8)	/* =1:manual */
 #define PCL_PHY_RESET_N		BIT(0)	/* =1:deasssert */
@@ -77,11 +79,12 @@ static void uniphier_pciephy_set_param(struct uniphier_pciephy_priv *priv,
 	val  = FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, 1);
 	val |= FIELD_PREP(TESTI_ADR_MASK, reg);
 	uniphier_pciephy_testio_write(priv, val);
-	val = readl(priv->base + PCL_PHY_TEST_O);
+	val = readl(priv->base + PCL_PHY_TEST_O) & TESTO_DAT_MASK;
 
 	/* update value */
-	val &= ~FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, mask);
-	val  = FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, mask & param);
+	val &= ~mask;
+	val |= mask & param;
+	val = FIELD_PREP(TESTI_DAT_MASK, val);
 	val |= FIELD_PREP(TESTI_ADR_MASK, reg);
 	uniphier_pciephy_testio_write(priv, val);
 	uniphier_pciephy_testio_write(priv, val | TESTI_WR_EN);
-- 
2.7.4


-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-07  3:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-07  3:50 Kunihiko Hayashi [this message]
2021-06-07  3:50 ` [PATCH] phy: uniphier-pcie: Fix updating phy parameters Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-06-07  3:50 ` Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-06-21  6:33 ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-21  6:33   ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-21  6:33   ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1623037842-19363-1-git-send-email-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
    --to=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
    --cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.