All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>,
	Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Rick Lindsley <ricklind@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/7] kernfs: use VFS negative dentry caching
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:50:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <162322862726.361452.10114120072438540655.stgit@web.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162322846765.361452.17051755721944717990.stgit@web.messagingengine.com>

If there are many lookups for non-existent paths these negative lookups
can lead to a lot of overhead during path walks.

The VFS allows dentries to be created as negative and hashed, and caches
them so they can be used to reduce the fairly high overhead alloc/free
cycle that occurs during these lookups.

Use the kernfs node parent revision to identify if a change has been
made to the containing directory so that the negative dentry can be
discarded and the lookup redone.

Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
---
 fs/kernfs/dir.c |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
index b3d1bc0f317d0..4f037456a8e17 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
@@ -1039,9 +1039,28 @@ static int kernfs_dop_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
 	if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU)
 		return -ECHILD;
 
-	/* Always perform fresh lookup for negatives */
-	if (d_really_is_negative(dentry))
-		goto out_bad_unlocked;
+	/* Negative hashed dentry? */
+	if (d_really_is_negative(dentry)) {
+		struct dentry *d_parent = dget_parent(dentry);
+		struct kernfs_node *parent;
+
+		/* If the kernfs parent node has changed discard and
+		 * proceed to ->lookup.
+		 */
+		parent = kernfs_dentry_node(d_parent);
+		if (parent) {
+			if (kernfs_dir_changed(parent, dentry)) {
+				dput(d_parent);
+				return 0;
+			}
+		}
+		dput(d_parent);
+
+		/* The kernfs node doesn't exist, leave the dentry
+		 * negative and return success.
+		 */
+		return 1;
+	}
 
 	kn = kernfs_dentry_node(dentry);
 	mutex_lock(&kernfs_mutex);
@@ -1067,7 +1086,6 @@ static int kernfs_dop_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
 	return 1;
 out_bad:
 	mutex_unlock(&kernfs_mutex);
-out_bad_unlocked:
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1082,33 +1100,27 @@ static struct dentry *kernfs_iop_lookup(struct inode *dir,
 	struct dentry *ret;
 	struct kernfs_node *parent = dir->i_private;
 	struct kernfs_node *kn;
-	struct inode *inode;
+	struct inode *inode = NULL;
 	const void *ns = NULL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&kernfs_mutex);
-
 	if (kernfs_ns_enabled(parent))
 		ns = kernfs_info(dir->i_sb)->ns;
 
 	kn = kernfs_find_ns(parent, dentry->d_name.name, ns);
-
-	/* no such entry */
-	if (!kn || !kernfs_active(kn)) {
-		ret = NULL;
-		goto out_unlock;
-	}
-
 	/* attach dentry and inode */
-	inode = kernfs_get_inode(dir->i_sb, kn);
-	if (!inode) {
-		ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-		goto out_unlock;
+	if (kn && kernfs_active(kn)) {
+		inode = kernfs_get_inode(dir->i_sb, kn);
+		if (!inode)
+			inode = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
-
-	/* instantiate and hash dentry */
+	/* Needed only for negative dentry validation */
+	if (!inode)
+		kernfs_set_rev(parent, dentry);
+	/* instantiate and hash (possibly negative) dentry */
 	ret = d_splice_alias(inode, dentry);
- out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&kernfs_mutex);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-09  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-09  8:49 [PATCH v6 0/7] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement Ian Kent
2021-06-09  8:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] kernfs: move revalidate to be near lookup Ian Kent
2021-06-11 12:45   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-09  8:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] kernfs: add a revision to identify directory node changes Ian Kent
2021-06-11 12:49   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-11 12:56     ` Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:11       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-11 13:31         ` Ian Kent
2021-06-11 14:05           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-11 14:16             ` Ian Kent
2021-06-09  8:50 ` Ian Kent [this message]
2021-06-11 13:07   ` [PATCH v6 3/7] kernfs: use VFS negative dentry caching Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-12  0:47     ` Ian Kent
2021-06-12  1:48       ` Al Viro
2021-06-13  1:16         ` Ian Kent
2021-06-12  0:07   ` Al Viro
2021-06-12  0:43     ` Ian Kent
2021-06-12  1:08       ` Ian Kent
2021-06-12  1:51         ` Al Viro
2021-06-13  1:57           ` Ian Kent
2021-06-09  8:50 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] kernfs: switch kernfs to use an rwsem Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:10   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-12  1:24   ` Al Viro
2021-06-09  8:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] kernfs: use i_lock to protect concurrent inode updates Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:11   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-12  1:45   ` Al Viro
2021-06-13  1:31     ` Ian Kent
2021-06-14  1:32     ` Ian Kent
2021-06-14  6:52       ` Ian Kent
2021-06-14  7:16         ` Ian Kent
2021-06-09  8:52 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] kernfs: add kernfs_need_inode_refresh() Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:13   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-09  8:52 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] kernfs: dont call d_splice_alias() under kernfs node lock Ian Kent
2021-06-11 13:14   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-09 10:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] kernfs: proposed locking and concurrency improvement Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=162322862726.361452.10114120072438540655.stgit@web.messagingengine.com \
    --to=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=brice.goglin@gmail.com \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=foxhlchen@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=ricklind@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.