All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zhang <zhanglikernel@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Li Zhang <zhanglikernel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Fix the issues btrfs-convert don't recognition ext4  i_{a,c,a}time_extra
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 01:04:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1629824687-21014-1-git-send-email-zhanglikernel@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi, I ran convert-tests.sh, and it reported that the
019-ext4-copy-timestamps test failed. The log  is as
follows

...
mount -o loop -t ext4 btrfs-progs/tests/test.img btrfs-progs/tests/mnt
====== RUN CHECK touch btrfs-progs/tests/mnt/file
====== RUN CHECK stat btrfs-progs/tests/mnt/file
File: 'btrfs-progs/tests/mnt/file'
Size: 0           Blocks: 0          IO Block: 4096   regular empty file
Device: 700h/1792d  Inode: 13          Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Context: unconfined_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0
Access: 2021-08-24 22:10:21.999209679 +0800
Modify: 2021-08-24 22:10:21.999209679 +0800
Change: 2021-08-24 22:10:21.999209679 +0800
...
btrfs-progs/btrfs-convert btrfs-progs/tests/test.img
...
====== RUN CHECK mount -t btrfs -o loop btrfs-progs/tests/test.img btrfs-progs/tests/mnt
====== RUN CHECK stat btrfs-progs/tests/mnt/file
File: 'btrfs-progs/tests/mnt/file'
Size: 0           Blocks: 0          IO Block: 4096   regular empty file
Device: 2ch/44d Inode: 267         Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Context: unconfined_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0
Access: 2021-08-24 22:10:21.000000000 +0800
Modify: 2021-08-24 22:10:21.000000000 +0800
Change: 2021-08-24 22:10:21.000000000 +0800
...
atime on converted inode does not match
test failed for case 019-ext4-copy-timestamps

Obviously, the log says that btrfs-convert does not
support nanoseconds. I looked at the source code and
found that only if ext2_fs.h defines EXT4_EPOCH_MASK
btrfs-convert to support nanoseconds. But in e2fsprogs,
EXT4_EPOCH_MASK was introduced in v1.43, but in some
older versions, such as v1.40, e2fsprogs actually
supports nanoseconds. It seems that if struct ext2_inode_large
contains the i_atime_extra member, ext4 is supports
nanoseconds, so I updated the logic to determine whether the
current ext4 file system supports nanosecond precision.
In addition, I imported some definitions to encode and
decode tv_nsec (copied from e2fsprogs source code).
---
 configure.ac | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index c4fa461..20297c5 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -253,7 +253,21 @@ AX_CHECK_DEFINE([linux/fiemap.h], [FIEMAP_EXTENT_SHARED], [],
 AX_CHECK_DEFINE([ext2fs/ext2_fs.h], [EXT4_EPOCH_MASK],
 		[AC_DEFINE([HAVE_EXT4_EPOCH_MASK_DEFINE], [1],
 			   [Define to 1 if e2fsprogs defines EXT4_EPOCH_MASK])],
-		[AC_MSG_WARN([no definition of EXT4_EPOCH_MASK found, probably old e2fsprogs, no 64bit time precision of converted images])])
+        [have_ext4_epoch_mask_define=no])
+
+AS_IF([test "x$have_ext4_epoch_mask_define" = xno], [
+    AC_CHECK_MEMBERS([struct ext2_inode_large.i_atime_extra],
+        [
+            AC_DEFINE([HAVE_EXT4_EPOCH_MASK_DEFINE], [1], [Define to 1 if ext2_inode_large includes i_atime_extra]),
+            AC_DEFINE([EXT4_EPOCH_BITS], [2],[for encode and decode tv_nsec in ext2 inode]),
+            AC_DEFINE([EXT4_EPOCH_MASK], [((1 << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) - 1)], [For encode and decode tv_nsec info in ext2 inode]),
+            AC_DEFINE([EXT4_NSEC_MASK],  [(~0UL << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS)], [For encode and decode tv_nsec info in ext2 inode]),
+            AC_DEFINE([inode_includes(size, field)],[m4_normalize[(size >= (sizeof(((struct ext2_inode_large *)0)->field) + offsetof(struct ext2_inode_large, field)))]],
+                [For encode and decode tv_nsec info in ext2 inode])
+        ],
+        [AC_MSG_WARN([It seems that ext2_inode_large don't includes tv_nsec related info, probably old e2fsprogs, no 64bit time precision of converted images])],
+        [[#include <ext2fs/ext2_fs.h>]])
+])
 
 AC_CHECK_HEADER(linux/blkzoned.h, [blkzoned_found=yes], [blkzoned_found=no])
 AC_CHECK_MEMBER([struct blk_zone.capacity], [blkzoned_capacity=yes], [blkzoned_capacity=no], [[#include <linux/blkzoned.h>]])
-- 
1.8.3.1


Best regards,
Li

             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-24 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-24 17:04 Li Zhang [this message]
2021-08-26 18:34 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Fix the issues btrfs-convert don't recognition ext4 i_{a,c,a}time_extra David Sterba
2021-08-28  4:41   ` li zhang
2021-08-30  9:34     ` David Sterba
2021-08-28 15:16   ` li zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1629824687-21014-1-git-send-email-zhanglikernel@gmail.com \
    --to=zhanglikernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.