All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] NFSD: Fix possible sleep during nfsd4_release_lockowner()
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 11:38:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <165323344948.2381.7808135229977810927.stgit@bazille.1015granger.net> (raw)

nfsd4_release_lockowner() holds clp->cl_lock when it calls
check_for_locks(). However, check_for_locks() calls nfsd_file_get()
/ nfsd_file_put() to access the backing inode's flc_posix list, and
nfsd_file_put() can sleep if the inode was recently removed.

Let's instead rely on the stateowner's reference count to gate
whether the release is permitted. This should be a reliable
indication of locks-in-use since file lock operations and
->lm_get_owner take appropriate references, which are released
appropriately when file locks are removed.

Reported-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

This might be a naive approach, but let's start with it.

This passes light testing, but it's not clear how much our existing
fleet of tests exercises this area. I've locally built a couple of
pynfs tests (one is based on the one Dai posted last week) and they
pass too.

I don't believe that FREE_STATEID needs the same simplification.

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index a280256cbb03..b77894e668a4 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -7559,12 +7559,9 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
 
 		/* see if there are still any locks associated with it */
 		lo = lockowner(sop);
-		list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
-			if (check_for_locks(stp->st_stid.sc_file, lo)) {
-				status = nfserr_locks_held;
-				spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
-				return status;
-			}
+		if (atomic_read(&sop->so_count) > 1) {
+			spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
+			return nfserr_locks_held;
 		}
 
 		nfs4_get_stateowner(sop);



             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-22 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-22 15:38 Chuck Lever [this message]
2022-05-23 13:40 ` [PATCH RFC] NFSD: Fix possible sleep during nfsd4_release_lockowner() Jeff Layton
2022-05-23 15:00   ` Chuck Lever III
2022-05-23 15:26     ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-23 15:41       ` Chuck Lever III
2022-05-23 16:37         ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-23 17:25           ` Chuck Lever III
2022-05-23 17:38             ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-23 19:35               ` Chuck Lever III
2022-05-23 19:43                 ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-23 20:17                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-23 20:32                     ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-23 17:43           ` Trond Myklebust
2022-05-23 18:04             ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-23 18:21               ` Trond Myklebust
2022-05-23 18:30                 ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-23 19:13                   ` Chuck Lever III
2022-05-23 19:36                     ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-23 20:29                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-23 21:15                         ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-23 21:28                           ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-24  0:07                             ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-05-23 22:18             ` Chuck Lever III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=165323344948.2381.7808135229977810927.stgit@bazille.1015granger.net \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.