All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] NFSD: Remove a layering violation when encoding lock_denied
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 08:56:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <169720169786.5129.10628552146876100129.stgit@oracle-102.nfsv4bat.org> (raw)

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

An XDR encoder is responsible for marshaling results, not releasing
memory that was allocated by the upper layer. We have .op_release
for that purpose.

Move the release of the ld_owner.data string to op_release functions
for LOCK and LOCKT.

Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c  |    2 ++
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c   |   16 ++--------------
 fs/nfsd/xdr4.h      |   17 +++++------------
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Fix for kmemleak found during Bake-a-thon.

I'm planning to insert this fix into nfsd-next just before the
patches that clean up the lock_denied encoder.

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
index 60262fd27b15..f288039545e3 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -3210,6 +3210,7 @@ static const struct nfsd4_operation nfsd4_ops[] = {
 	},
 	[OP_LOCK] = {
 		.op_func = nfsd4_lock,
+		.op_release = nfsd4_lock_release,
 		.op_flags = OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING |
 				OP_NONTRIVIAL_ERROR_ENCODE,
 		.op_name = "OP_LOCK",
@@ -3218,6 +3219,7 @@ static const struct nfsd4_operation nfsd4_ops[] = {
 	},
 	[OP_LOCKT] = {
 		.op_func = nfsd4_lockt,
+		.op_release = nfsd4_lockt_release,
 		.op_flags = OP_NONTRIVIAL_ERROR_ENCODE,
 		.op_name = "OP_LOCKT",
 		.op_rsize_bop = nfsd4_lock_rsize,
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 07840ee721ef..305c353a416c 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -7773,6 +7773,14 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
 	return status;
 }
 
+void nfsd4_lock_release(union nfsd4_op_u *u)
+{
+	struct nfsd4_lock *lock = &u->lock;
+	struct nfsd4_lock_denied *deny = &lock->lk_denied;
+
+	kfree(deny->ld_owner.data);
+}
+
 /*
  * The NFSv4 spec allows a client to do a LOCKT without holding an OPEN,
  * so we do a temporary open here just to get an open file to pass to
@@ -7878,6 +7886,14 @@ nfsd4_lockt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
 	return status;
 }
 
+void nfsd4_lockt_release(union nfsd4_op_u *u)
+{
+	struct nfsd4_lockt *lockt = &u->lockt;
+	struct nfsd4_lock_denied *deny = &lockt->lt_denied;
+
+	kfree(deny->ld_owner.data);
+}
+
 __be32
 nfsd4_locku(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
 	    union nfsd4_op_u *u)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
index dafb3a91235e..26e7bb6d32ab 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
@@ -3990,28 +3990,16 @@ nfsd4_encode_lock_denied(struct xdr_stream *xdr, struct nfsd4_lock_denied *ld)
 	struct xdr_netobj *conf = &ld->ld_owner;
 	__be32 *p;
 
-again:
 	p = xdr_reserve_space(xdr, 32 + XDR_LEN(conf->len));
-	if (!p) {
-		/*
-		 * Don't fail to return the result just because we can't
-		 * return the conflicting open:
-		 */
-		if (conf->len) {
-			kfree(conf->data);
-			conf->len = 0;
-			conf->data = NULL;
-			goto again;
-		}
+	if (!p)
 		return nfserr_resource;
-	}
+
 	p = xdr_encode_hyper(p, ld->ld_start);
 	p = xdr_encode_hyper(p, ld->ld_length);
 	*p++ = cpu_to_be32(ld->ld_type);
 	if (conf->len) {
 		p = xdr_encode_opaque_fixed(p, &ld->ld_clientid, 8);
 		p = xdr_encode_opaque(p, conf->data, conf->len);
-		kfree(conf->data);
 	}  else {  /* non - nfsv4 lock in conflict, no clientid nor owner */
 		p = xdr_encode_hyper(p, (u64)0); /* clientid */
 		*p++ = cpu_to_be32(0); /* length of owner name */
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h b/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
index aba07d5378fc..e6c9daae196e 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
+++ b/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
@@ -292,12 +292,8 @@ struct nfsd4_lock {
 	} v;
 
 	/* response */
-	union {
-		struct {
-			stateid_t               stateid;
-		} ok;
-		struct nfsd4_lock_denied        denied;
-	} u;
+	stateid_t			lk_resp_stateid;
+	struct nfsd4_lock_denied        lk_denied;
 };
 #define lk_new_open_seqid       v.new.open_seqid
 #define lk_new_open_stateid     v.new.open_stateid
@@ -307,20 +303,15 @@ struct nfsd4_lock {
 #define lk_old_lock_stateid     v.old.lock_stateid
 #define lk_old_lock_seqid       v.old.lock_seqid
 
-#define lk_resp_stateid u.ok.stateid
-#define lk_denied       u.denied
-
-
 struct nfsd4_lockt {
 	u32				lt_type;
 	clientid_t			lt_clientid;
 	struct xdr_netobj		lt_owner;
 	u64				lt_offset;
 	u64				lt_length;
-	struct nfsd4_lock_denied  	lt_denied;
+	struct nfsd4_lock_denied	lt_denied;
 };
 
- 
 struct nfsd4_locku {
 	u32             lu_type;
 	u32             lu_seqid;
@@ -942,8 +933,10 @@ extern __be32 nfsd4_open_downgrade(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
 		struct nfsd4_compound_state *, union nfsd4_op_u *u);
 extern __be32 nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *,
 		union nfsd4_op_u *u);
+extern void nfsd4_lock_release(union nfsd4_op_u *u);
 extern __be32 nfsd4_lockt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *,
 		union nfsd4_op_u *u);
+extern void nfsd4_lockt_release(union nfsd4_op_u *u);
 extern __be32 nfsd4_locku(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *,
 		union nfsd4_op_u *u);
 extern __be32



             reply	other threads:[~2023-10-13 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-13 12:56 Chuck Lever [this message]
2023-10-13 13:16 ` [PATCH] NFSD: Remove a layering violation when encoding lock_denied Jeff Layton
2023-10-13 13:20 ` Benjamin Coddington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=169720169786.5129.10628552146876100129.stgit@oracle-102.nfsv4bat.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.