All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] regulator: push allocation in regulator_init_coupling() outside of lock
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 03:31:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a889cf7f61c6429c9e6b34ddcdde99be77a26b6.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>

Allocating memory with regulator_list_mutex held makes lockdep unhappy
when memory pressure makes the system do fs_reclaim on eg. eMMC using
a regulator. Push the lock inside regulator_init_coupling() after the
allocation.

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.7.13+ #533 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/383 is trying to acquire lock:
cca78ca4 (&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: __submit_merged_write_cond+0x104/0x154
but task is already holding lock:
c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       fs_reclaim_acquire.part.11+0x40/0x50
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x24/0x28
       __kmalloc+0x54/0x218
       regulator_register+0x860/0x1584
       dummy_regulator_probe+0x60/0xa8
[...]
other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem --> regulator_list_mutex --> fs_reclaim

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(regulator_list_mutex);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
  lock(&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem);
 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by kswapd0/383:
 #0: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50
[...]

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: d8ca7d184b33 ("regulator: core: Introduce API for regulators coupling customization")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 0a32c3da0e26..510d234f6c46 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -5010,7 +5010,10 @@ static int regulator_init_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	if (!of_check_coupling_data(rdev))
 		return -EPERM;
 
+	mutex_lock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 	rdev->coupling_desc.coupler = regulator_find_coupler(rdev);
+	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
+
 	if (IS_ERR(rdev->coupling_desc.coupler)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(rdev->coupling_desc.coupler);
 		rdev_err(rdev, "failed to get coupler: %d\n", err);
@@ -5218,9 +5221,7 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto wash;
 
-	mutex_lock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 	ret = regulator_init_coupling(rdev);
-	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto wash;
 
-- 
2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-12  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-12  1:31 [PATCH v2 0/7] regulator: fix deadlock vs memory reclaim Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12  1:31 ` Michał Mirosław [this message]
2020-08-12  1:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] regulator: push allocation in regulator_ena_gpio_request() out of lock Michał Mirosław
2020-08-18  0:25   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-08-12  1:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] regulator: push allocations in create_regulator() outside " Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12  1:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12  6:29   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2020-08-12 14:09     ` Michał Mirosław
2020-08-13  8:29       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2020-08-12  1:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] regulator: push allocation in set_consumer_device_supply() out of lock Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12  1:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] regulator: cleanup regulator_ena_gpio_free() Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12  1:31 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] regulator: remove superfluous lock in regulator_resolve_coupling() Michał Mirosław

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1a889cf7f61c6429c9e6b34ddcdde99be77a26b6.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
    --to=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.