All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net] net/sched: act_pedit: really ensure the skb is writable
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 16:57:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1fcf78e6679d0a287dd61bb0f04730ce33b3255d.1652194627.git.pabeni@redhat.com> (raw)

Currently pedit tries to ensure that the accessed skb offset
is writable via skb_unclone(). The action potentially allows
touching any skb bytes, so it may end-up modifying shared data.

The above causes some sporadic MPTCP self-test failures, due to
this code:

	tc -n $ns2 filter add dev ns2eth$i egress \
		protocol ip prio 1000 \
		handle 42 fw \
		action pedit munge offset 148 u8 invert \
		pipe csum tcp \
		index 100

The above modifies a data byte outside the skb head and the skb is
a cloned one, carrying a TCP output packet.

This change addresses the issue by keeping track of a rough
over-estimate highest skb offset accessed by the action and ensuring
such offset is really writable.

Note that this may cause performance regressions in some scenarios,
but hopefully pedit is not in the critical path.

v2 -> v3:
 - more descriptive commit message (Jamal)

v1 -> v2:
 - cleanup hint update (Jakub)
 - avoid raices while accessing the hint (Jakub)
 - re-organize the comments for clarity

Fixes: db2c24175d14 ("act_pedit: access skb->data safely")
Acked-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
 include/net/tc_act/tc_pedit.h |  1 +
 net/sched/act_pedit.c         | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/tc_pedit.h b/include/net/tc_act/tc_pedit.h
index 748cf87a4d7e..3e02709a1df6 100644
--- a/include/net/tc_act/tc_pedit.h
+++ b/include/net/tc_act/tc_pedit.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct tcf_pedit {
 	struct tc_action	common;
 	unsigned char		tcfp_nkeys;
 	unsigned char		tcfp_flags;
+	u32			tcfp_off_max_hint;
 	struct tc_pedit_key	*tcfp_keys;
 	struct tcf_pedit_key_ex	*tcfp_keys_ex;
 };
diff --git a/net/sched/act_pedit.c b/net/sched/act_pedit.c
index 31fcd279c177..0eaaf1f45de1 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_pedit.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_pedit.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int tcf_pedit_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 	struct nlattr *pattr;
 	struct tcf_pedit *p;
 	int ret = 0, err;
-	int ksize;
+	int i, ksize;
 	u32 index;
 
 	if (!nla) {
@@ -228,6 +228,18 @@ static int tcf_pedit_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 		p->tcfp_nkeys = parm->nkeys;
 	}
 	memcpy(p->tcfp_keys, parm->keys, ksize);
+	p->tcfp_off_max_hint = 0;
+	for (i = 0; i < p->tcfp_nkeys; ++i) {
+		u32 cur = p->tcfp_keys[i].off;
+
+		/* The AT option can read a single byte, we can bound the actual
+		 * value with uchar max.
+		 */
+		cur += (0xff & p->tcfp_keys[i].offmask) >> p->tcfp_keys[i].shift;
+
+		/* Each key touches 4 bytes starting from the computed offset */
+		p->tcfp_off_max_hint = max(p->tcfp_off_max_hint, cur + 4);
+	}
 
 	p->tcfp_flags = parm->flags;
 	goto_ch = tcf_action_set_ctrlact(*a, parm->action, goto_ch);
@@ -308,13 +320,18 @@ static int tcf_pedit_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
 			 struct tcf_result *res)
 {
 	struct tcf_pedit *p = to_pedit(a);
+	u32 max_offset;
 	int i;
 
-	if (skb_unclone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
-		return p->tcf_action;
-
 	spin_lock(&p->tcf_lock);
 
+	max_offset = (skb_transport_header_was_set(skb) ?
+		      skb_transport_offset(skb) :
+		      skb_network_offset(skb)) +
+		     p->tcfp_off_max_hint;
+	if (skb_ensure_writable(skb, min(skb->len, max_offset)))
+		goto unlock;
+
 	tcf_lastuse_update(&p->tcf_tm);
 
 	if (p->tcfp_nkeys > 0) {
@@ -403,6 +420,7 @@ static int tcf_pedit_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
 	p->tcf_qstats.overlimits++;
 done:
 	bstats_update(&p->tcf_bstats, skb);
+unlock:
 	spin_unlock(&p->tcf_lock);
 	return p->tcf_action;
 }
-- 
2.35.3


             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-10 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-10 14:57 Paolo Abeni [this message]
2022-05-10 21:12 ` [PATCH v3 net] net/sched: act_pedit: really ensure the skb is writable Jamal Hadi Salim
2022-05-11 22:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1fcf78e6679d0a287dd61bb0f04730ce33b3255d.1652194627.git.pabeni@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.